Kurumsal Organizasyonlarda Ölçeklenebilirlik ve Dönüşümsel Öğrenme Kültürü için Kitlesel Açık Çevrimiçi Dersler

2019 yılının sonbaharında ortaya çıkan Covid-19 pandemisi, eğitim dahil tüm sektörlerde dramatik değişikliklere neden oldu. Eğitim sektörü eğitmen eksikliği nedeniyle eşit şekilde etkilendi. Okullar, sınırlı hazırlıkla yüz yüze öğretim ve öğrenimden çevrimiçi öğretim ve öğrenime geçişin ani paradigma kayması nedeniyle çeşitli zorluklarla karşı karşıya kaldı. Ölçeklenebilirlik ve dinamik yeteneklerini korumaya yönelik yıllık stratejilerini sürdürmek için kuruluşlar, yeterli hazırlıkları olmamasına rağmen çevrimiçi eğitime geçmek zorunda kaldılar. Ancak, bu zor zamanlarda çalışanlarını eğitmek için kurumsal kuruluşlar tarafından kullanılması gereken kitlesel açık çevrimiçi dersler (KAÇD'ler) gibi elektronik öğrenme yenilikleri, esas olarak eğitim kurumları için uyarlanmıştır. Daha da ötesi, KAÇD'ler tüm işletmeler için gerekli olmakla birlikte, bunların kurumsal eğitim için benimsenmesini bildiren çok az model geliştirilmiş veya hiç geliştirilmemiştir. Bu çalışma, bu açığı kapatmayı amaçlamış, böylece Güney Afrika özel sektörlerinden toplanan verilere dayanmaktadır. KAÇD'lerin kurumsal eğitimde benimsenmesi için bir model geliştirmiş ve nicel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, teknolojiyle öğretme stillerine ve teknoloji kontrolüne yönelik algı ve tutumun, KAÇD'nin kurumsal eğitim için benimsenmesini etkileyen temel faktörler olduğunu göstermiştir. Geliştirilen model, KAÇD'lerin işyeri eğitimi için benimsenmesine ilişkin içgörü sağlamak ve KAÇD’lerin kullanımına ilişkin araştırmaları genişletmek için kullanılacaktır.

Massive Open Online Courses for Scalability and Transformational Culture of Learning in Corporate Organizations

The global pandemic of coronavirus “Covid-19” in the fall of 2019 caused dramatic changes in all sectors, including education. Businesses, like corporate organizations that normally train their employees annually, were equally affected, due to lack of instructors. Learning institutions were faced with various challenges due to the abrupt paradigm shift of changing from face-to-face to online teaching and learning, with limited preparedness. For scalability, and to maintain their annual strategies of keeping their dynamic capabilities, organizations were forced to adapt online training although with limited preparedness. However, electronic learning innovations such as the massive open online courses (MOOCs) that should have been leveraged by corporate organizations to train their employees during these hard times, had been mainly tailored for educational institutions. More still, much as MOOCs are essential for all enterprises, there have been few or no models developed to inform their adoption for corporate training. This study sought to bridge this gap, thus developed a model for MOOCs adoption for corporate training, based on data collected from South African private sectors, and analysed quantitatively. Results indicated that perception and attitude toward technology, teaching styles, and technology control are key influencing factors of MOOCs adoption for corporate training. The developed model will be used to provide insights into MOOCs adoption for workplace training, and to extend research on MOOCs usage. It is recommended that future studies consider the analysis of the moderating effects of respondents’ demographics, their perceptions possibly changing over time.

___

  • Alamri, M.M. (2022). Investigating Students’ Adoption of MOOCs during COVID-19 Pandemic: Students’ Academic Self-Efficacy, Learning Engagement, and Learning Persistence. Sustainability, 14 (714). https://doi.org/10.3390/ su14020714
  • Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M. & Sinclair, J. (2017), June. Identifying Success Factors for e- Learning in Higher Education. In International Conference on e-Learning, Academic Conferences international limited : 247-255
  • Alharbi, O. & Lally, V. (2017). Adoption of E-Learning in Saudi Arabian University Education: Three Factors Affecting Educators. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies, 2(2): 63-85
  • Aluko, R. Krull, G. & Mhlanga, E. (2022). Shaping open, distance and e-learning in post school education and training: A call for a revised agenda. Perspectives in Education, 40(1): 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v40.i1.1
  • Barteit, S., Depoux, A., Sié, A., YÉ, M. & Sauerborn, R. (2018). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) on climate change and health: teaching a global audience. Climate Literacy and Innovations in Climate Change Education. Springer, Cham: 169-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70199-8_10
  • Chaker, R. & Bachelet, R. (2020). Internationalizing Professional Development: Using Educational Data Mining to Analyse Learners’ Performance and Dropouts in a French MOOC. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(4): 199-221. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i4.4787
  • De Pietro, R., Wiarda, E. & Fleischer, M., (1990). The context for change: Organization, technology and environment. The processes of technological innovation, 199(0): 151-175.
  • Dousay, T.A. & Janak, E., (2018). All things considered: educational radio as the first MOOCs. TechTrends, 62(6): 555-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0257-x
  • Kalema, B.M. (2022). Developing Countries’ E-services Continuance Usage after Covid-19 in the 4IR Era. The Future Work and Digital Skills NEMISA Summit and Colloquium: 15-17 Feb 2022, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Kanwar, A. & Daniel, J. (2020). Report to Commonwealth Education Ministers: From Response to Resilience. Commonwealth of Learning.
  • Karnouskos, S. (2017). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) as an enabler for competent employees and innovation in industry. Computers in Industry, 91: 1- 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2017.05.001
  • Kerr, J., Dale, V. & Gyurko, F. (2018). A MOOC Design Mapping Framework (MDMF): Evaluation of Academics’ and Learning Technologists’ Experiences. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 17(1): 38-51
  • Ma, L. & Lee, C.S. (2019). Investigating the adoption of MOOC s: A technology–user–environment perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(1): 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12314
  • Mallee, N. (2018). The Importance of Corporate Training for Business. Working Voices Series. Available: https://www.workingvoices.com/insights/the-importance-of-corporate-training-for-business/
  • Marques, M. & Azevedo, J. (2017). MOOC Success Factors: Proposal of an Analysis Framework. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 16(1): 233-251. https://doi.org/10.28945/3861
  • Mcgill, T. J., Klobas, J. E. & Renzi, S. (2014). Critical success factors for the continuation of e-learning initiatives. Internet and Higher Education, 22(1): 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.001
  • Mori, K. & Ractliffe, L. (2016). Evaluating the use of a MOOC within higher education professional development training. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web: 831-833. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2890577
  • Oyo, B. & Kalema, B.M. (2014). Massive open online courses for Africa by Africa. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6): 1- 13. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1889
  • Palinkas, L. A., Springgate, B. F., Sugarman, O. K., Hancock, J., Wennerstrom, A., Haywood, C., Meyers, D., Johnson, A., Polk, M., Pesson, C. L.,
  • Seay, J. E., Stallard, C. N., & Wells, K. B. (2021). A Rapid Assessment of Disaster Preparedness Needs and Resources during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(2): 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020425
  • Sammour, G., Al-Zoubi, A., Gladun, A., Khala, K. & Schreurs, J. (2015). MOOCs in universities: Intelligent model for delivering online learning content. In 2015 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS): 167-171. https://doi.org/10.1109/IntelCIS.2015.7397216
  • Sigama, K. & Kalema, B.M. (2018). Conceptualizing MOOCs implementation for higher education in developing countries. In 2018 IEEE 6th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE): 14-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITE.2018.8747114
  • Tyler, K. (2020). Upskilling Benefits Companies and Employees. Society for Human Resource Management. Available: https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/summer2020/pages/upskilling-benefits-companies-and-employees.aspx
  • Zhao, L., Ao, Y., Wang, Y. & Wang, T. (2022). Impact of Home-Based Learning Experience During COVID-19 on Future Intentions to Study Online: A Chinese University Perspective. Frontier Psychology. 13 (862965): 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862965
  • Ziegenfuss, D., Furse, C., Sykes, E., & Buendía, E. (2019). Beyond the Click: Rethinking Assessment of an Adult Professional Development MOOC. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(1): 63- 72.
  • Żur, A. & Friedl, C. (2021). Transforming Workplace Learning: A Qualitative Inquiry into Adopting Massive Open Online Courses into Corporate Learning and Development. Education Sciences, 11(6): 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060295