___

• Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools, Journal of Labor Economics. 25 (1), 95-135.
• Altunbay, M., & Alaca, J. (2021). Öğretmen temalı filmlerde sunulan “ideal öğretmen” modeli. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 50(230), 409-422. DOI: 10.37669/milliegitim.685711.
• Arnon, S., & Reichel, N. (2007). Who is the ideal teacher? Am I? Similarity and difference in perception of students of education regarding the qualities of a good teacher and of their own qualities as teachers. Teachers And Teaching: Theory And Practice, 13(5), 441-464.
• Arseven, A. D. (1994). Field research method, principles techniques examples. Ankara: Gül Publishing
• Atar, H. Y. (2014). Multilevel effects of teacher characteristics on TIMSS 2011 science achievement. Education and Science, Large-Scale Assessment, 39(172), 121-137.
• Başdemir, H. Y. (2014). Interim suggestions for education reform in Turkey. Liberal Thinking, 19(76), 101-118.
• Betts, P., & Frost L. (2000). Subject knowledge and teacher preparation, Education Canada, 40(1), 38-39.
• Booth, D., & Coles, R. (2017). What is a" good" teacher? Pembroke Publishers Limited.
• Borg, S. (2006). The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 3-31.
• Buaraphan, K. (2012). Multiple perspectives on desirable characteristics of science teachers for educational reform. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(2), 384-393.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Anket geliştirme. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 133-151.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akbaba Altun, S., & Yıldırım, K. (2010). TALIS Turkey national report. MEB General Directorate of Foreign Relations, Ankara. 06.02.2021 Retive from: https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_09/10142823_TALIS_RAPORU-.pdf
• Cerit, Y. (2008). Students, teachers and administrators’ views on metaphors with respect to the concept of teacher, The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 6(4), 693-712.
• Chang, C.Y. (2001). Comparing the impacts of a problem-based computer-assisted instruction and the direct-interactive teaching method on student science achievement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 147-156.
• Check, J. (1986). Positive traits of the effective teacher- Negative traits of the ineffective one. Education, 106, 326-334.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design choosing among five approaches (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE Publications.
• Çalışkan, M., Işık, A. N., & Saygın, Y. (2013). Prospective teachers' perception of ideal teacher. Elementary Education Online, 12(2), 575-584.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future, Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 35-47. Dijital Öğretmenler (n.d.). https://dijitalogretmenler.com/ Retrieved January 9, 2022, from https://dijitalogretmenler.com/.
• Feng, L., & Sass, T.R. (2018). The impact of incentives to recruit and retain teachers in “hard-to-staff” subjects, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37(1), 112-135
• Ferguson, P., & Womack, S.T. (1993), The impact of subject matter and on teaching performance, Journal of Teacher Education. 44(1), 55-63
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
• Goe, L. (2007). The link between teacher quality and student outcomes: A research synthesis. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Unpublished Dochtora Tessis. Vanderbilt University, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED521219
• Goldhaber, D., & E. Anthony (2007).Can teacher quality be effectively assessed? National board certification as a signal of effective teaching. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 134-150.
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(4), 233-252.
• Gündüz, M. (2014). Primary school students’ thoughts about efficient teacher. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 11(I), 114-128.
• Hallinan, M.T. (2008). Teacher influences on students’ attachment to school. Sociology of Education, 81(3) 271-283.
• Hoy, C., Bayne-Jardine, C. C., & Wood, M. (2000). Improving quality in education. Psychology Press.
• Johnson, B., & Christiensen, L. (2014). Educational reserach quantative, qualitative and mixed approaches: Mixed methods (A. Turkdogan, Trans.). Ankara: Eğiten Book
• Kim, L. E., Jörg, V., & Klassen, R. M. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of teacher personality on teacher effectiveness and burnout. Educational Psychology Review, 31,163–195.
• Koutsoulis, M. (2003). The characteristics of the effective teacher in Cyprus public high school: The students' perspective. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators. (ERIC Eric Document Reproduction Service No. 478 761).
• Kutnick, P., & Jules, V. (1993) Pupils’ perception of a good teacher: A developmental perspective from Trinidad and Tobago. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 400–413.
• Lang, H., McKee, B., & Conner, K. (1993). Characteristics of effective teachers: A descriptive study of the perceptions of faculty and deaf college students. American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 252-259.
• Lee, F. L. M., Yeung, A. S., Tracey, D., & Barker, K. (2015). Inclusion of children with special needs in early childhood education: What teacher characteristics matter. Topics in early childhood special education, 35(2), 79-88.
• Lei, z., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Computers & Education, 49(2), 284-296.
• Liu, S., & Meng, L. (2009). Perceptions of teachers, students and parents of the characteristics of good teachers: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the United States. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 313-328.
• Maden, S., Durukan, E., & Aslan, A. (2010). Turkish teacher candidates’ views about teacher qualifıcations. Turkish Studies International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 5(4), 1364-1378.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2016). Qualitative data analysis (S. Akbaba Akgül and A. Ersoy, Trans.). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2017). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlilikleri, Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Geliştirme Genel müdürlüğü, Ankara.
• Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (1973). Milli Eğitim Temel Kanunu. Ankara: Resmi Gazete, Tarih: 24.6.1973 Sayı: 14574.
• Minor, L., Onwuegbuzie, A., Witcher, A., & James, T. L. (2002). Preservice teachers' educational beliefs and their perceptions of characteristics of effective teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 96, 116-127.
• Morgil, F. İ., & Yılmaz, A. (1999). Duties and qualifications of science teachers, suggestions for science teacher training. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Education, 15, 181-186.
• Murphy, P. K., Delli, L. A., & Edwards, M. N. (2004). The good teacher and teaching: Comparing beliefs of second-grade students, preservice teachers, and inservice teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(2), 69-92.
• Nikitina, L., & Furuoka, F. (2008). “A language teacher is like…” examining malaysian students’ perceptions of language teachers trough metaphor analysis. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(2), 192-205.
• OECD (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris https://www.oecd.org/education/school/34990905.pdf
• Okçabol, R. (2004). Teacher training from the perspective of students, teachers, teacher candidates and instructors! XIII. National Educational Sciences Congress, 6-9 July 2004 İnönü University, Faculty of Education, Malatya.
• Opdenakker, M. C., & Damme, J. V. (2005). Teacher characteristics and teaching styles as effectiveness enhancing factors of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 1-21.
• Özkan, M., & Arslantaş, H. İ. (2013). A study of scaling with ranking judgment method on characteristic of effectıve teacher. Trakya University Journal of Social Sciences, 15(1), 311-330.
• Park, G. P., & Lee, H. W. (2006). The characteristics of effective English teachers as perceived by high school teachers and students in Korea, Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(2),236-248.
• Raichel, N. (2022). The image of the ‘good teacher’ in the modern school in Eretz Israel, 1885-1914, Israel Affairs, 28(2), 232-248 DOI: 10.1080/13537121.2022.2041315
• Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S.O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J.A., (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement, American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475-514
• Schmoker, M. (2004). Learning communities at the crossroads: Toward the best schools we’ve ever had. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 84-88.
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), 63-75
• Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., Tucker, P. D., & Hindman, J. L. (2008). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personal Evaluation Education, 20, 165-184.
• Taşkaya, S. M. (2012). The analysis of the characteristics a qualified teacher according to the opinions of prospective teachers. Journal of the Social Sciences Institute, 33(2), 283-298.
• Tavşancıl, E., & Aslan, A. E. (2001). Content analysis and application examples for oral, written and other materials. İstanbul: Epsilon Publishing.
• Turkish: TDK (2022, September 12). Nitelik. https://sozluk.gov.tr/
• UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2006). Teachers and educational quality: Monitoring global needs for 2015. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001457/145754e.pdf.
• Walls, R. T., Nardi, A. H., Von Minden, A. M., & Hoffman, N. (2002). The characteristics of effective and ineffective teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(1), 39-48.
• Witcher, A. E., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Minor, L. C. (2001). Characteristics of effective teachers: Perceptions of preservice teachers. Research in the Schools, 8(2), 45–57
• Yıldırım, A. (2013). Teacher Education Research in Turkey: Trends, İssues and Priority Areas. Education and Science, 38(169), 175-191.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
• Yıldırım, A., Ünal, A., & Çelik, M. (2011). The analysis of principle’s, supervisor’s and teacher’s perception of the term teacher”. Journal of Human Sciences, 8(2), 93-108.
• Yu, R., & Singh, K. (2018). Teacher support, instructional practices, student motivation, and mathematics achievement in high school The Journal of Educational Research, 111(1), 81-94.