Aylin AYDIN SAYILAN, Ezgi SEYHAN AK, Feride EŞKİN BACAKSIZ, Nurşen KULAKAÇ, John Rey B. MACINDO

Ağrı yönetimi öz yeterlilik ölçeğinin türkçeye uyarlanması

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Ağrı Yönetimi Öz Yeterlilik Ölçeğinin Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğini incemelektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma, Eylül-Aralık 2018 tarihleri arasında 214 hemşire ve 248 hemşirelik öğrencisiyle tanımlayıcı ve metodolojik olarak yapıldı. Veriler, tanıtıcı özellikler formu ve Ağrı Yönetimi Öz Yeterlilik Ölçeği kullanılarak toplandı. Bulgular: Ölçeğin Cronbach alfa iç tutarlılık katsayısı 0,90 olarak bulundu. Zaman güvenilirliğini test etmek için tekrarlanan ölçümlerde, iki ölçüm arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı (t=0,320, p=0,751), yüksek güç ve pozitif olarak yüksek anlamlı bir ilişki vardı (r=0,997, p

Adaptation of the pain management self-efficacy questionnaire into Turkish

Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the Turkish validity and reliability of the Pain Management Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PMSEQ). Methods: The study was carried out descriptively and methodologically between September and December 2018 with 214 nurses and 248 nursing students. The data were collected using the descriptive characteristics form and the PMSEQ. Results: Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient was 0.90 in the total scale. In repeated measurements to test time reliability, there was no statistically significant difference between the two measurements (t=0.320, p=0.751), and there were a high power and positively highly significant relationship (r=0.997, p

PDF

___

1. Schug SA, Palmer GM, Scott DA, Halliwell R, Trinca J. Working group of the Australian and New Zealand college of anaesthetists and faculty of pain medicine. Acute pain management: Scientific evidence. 4th ed. Melbourne: ANZCA & FPM; 2015.
2. International Association for the Study of Pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. In: Merskey H, Bogduk N, editors. Classification of chronic pain. 2nd ed, revised. p. 250. Available at: https:// www.iasppain.org/Education/Content.aspx?ItemNumb er=1698&navItemNumber=576#Pain. Accessed Feb 25, 2022.
3. The Joint Commission. Pain assessment and management standards for behavioral health care, 2019. Available at: https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_20_ Pain_standards_BHC_12_21_18_FINAL.pdf. Accessed Feb 25, 2022.
4. Macindo JRB, Soriano CAF, Gonzales HRM, Simbulan PJT, Torres GCS, Que JC. Development and psychometric appraisal of the pain management self-efficacy questionnaire. Journal of Advance Nursing 2018;74:1993–2004.
5. Berry PH, Dahl JL. The new JCAHO pain standards: implications for pain management nurses. Pain Manag Nurs 2000;1(1):3–12. [CrossRef ]
6. Cervo FA, Raggi RP, Bright-Long LE, Wright WK, Rows G, Torres AE, et al. Use of the certified nursing assistant pain assessment tool (CPAT) in nursing home residents with dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2007;22(2):112– 9. [CrossRef ]
7. Herr K. Pain assessment strategies in older patients. J Pain 2011;12(3 Suppl 1):S3–S13. [CrossRef ]
8. Vallano A, Malouf J, Payrulet P, Baños JE; Catalan Research Group for Studying Pain in Hospital. Prevalence of pain in adults admitted to Catalonian hospitals: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Pain 2006;10(8):721–31. [CrossRef ]
9. Lindsay L, Kristen B, Micheal D, Tyler V. E.M.: A case report of chronic low back pain. Student-led Mini Grants. https:// dune.une.edu/ceipe_allminigrants/10/. Accessed Feb 25, 2022.
10. International Association for the Study of Pain [IASP]. (2011). Declaration of Montréal. Declaration that access to pain management is a fundamental human right. Available at: https://www.iasp-pain.org/DeclarationofMontreal. Accessed Feb 25, 2022. [CrossRef]
11. Royal College of Physicians. British geriatrics society and british pain society the assessment of pain in older people: national guidelines Concise guidance to good practice series, No 8. London, 2007. Available at: https://www.britishpainsociety. org/static/uploads/resources/files/book_ pain_older_people.pdf. Accessed Feb 25, 2022.
12. Gregory J, McGowan L. An examination of the prevalence of acute pain for hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs 2016;25(5–6):583–98. [CrossRef]
13. Wilson M. Integrating the concept of pain interference into pain management. Pain Manag Nurs 2014;15(2):499–505.
14. WHO. Scoping document for WHO treatment guidelines on pain related to cancer, HIV and other progressive lifethreatening illnesses in adults, 2008. Available at: https:// www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/Scoping_ WHO_GLs_PersistPainAdults_webversion.pdf?ua=1. Accessed Feb 25, 2022.
15. Al Qadire M, Al Khalaileh M. Jordanian nurses knowledge and attitude regarding pain management. Pain Manag Nurs 2014;15(1):220–8. [CrossRef]
16. Jackson EB. Evaluating knowledge and attitudes of graduate nursing students regarding pain. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/ viewcontent. cgi?article=4360&context=etd. Accessed Feb 25, 2022.
17. Hroch J, VanDenKerkhof EG, Sawhney M, Sears N, Gedcke- Kerr L. Knowledge and attitudes about pain management among canadian nursing students. Pain Manag Nurs 2019;20(4):382–9. [CrossRef]
18. Seers K, Watt-Watson J, Bucknall T. Challenges of pain management for the 21st century. J Adv Nurs 2006;55(1):4–6.
19. Song W, Eaton LH, Gordon DB, Hoyle C, Doorenbos AZ. Evaluation of Evidence-based Nursing Pain Management Practice. Pain Manag Nurs 2015;16(4):456–63. [CrossRef] 20. Edwards HE, Nash RE, Yates PM, Walsh AM, Fentiman BJ, McDowell JK, et al. Improving pain management by nurses: A pilot Peer Intervention Program. Nurs Health Sci 2001;3(1):35–45. [CrossRef]
21. Chiang LC, Chen HJ, Huang L. Student nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy of children’s pain management: evaluation of an education program in Taiwan. J Pain Symptom Manage 2006;32(1):82–9. [CrossRef]
22. Esin MN. Data collection methods and tools & reliabil ity and validity of data collection tools. In: Erdoğan S, Nahcivan N, Esin MN, editors. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Kita bı. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi; 2014.
23. Tavsancıl E. Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. 5th ed. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık; 2014.
24. Kline P. An easy guide to factor analysis. 1st ed. London: Taylor & Francis Group; 1994.
25. Ural A, Kılıc I. Scientific research process and data analysis with SPSS. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık; 2018. p. 236–76.
26. Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Soc Work Res 2003;27(2):94– 104. [CrossRef ]
27. DeVellis R. Ölçek geliştirme kuramı ve uygulamalar. In: Tarık Totan, translator editor. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık; 2014.
28. Buyukozturk O, Cakmak EK, Akgun OK, Karadeniz Ş, Demirel F. Methods of scientific research. Ankara: Pegem Akademi; 2012.
29. Cakır A. Faktör analizi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı İşletme Doktora Programı; 2014.
30. Yong AG, Pearce SA. Beginner’s guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 2013;9(2):79–94 [CrossRef ]
31. Özabacı N. İlişki niteliği ölçeği’nin Türkçe uyarlaması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim 2011;36(162):160–7.
32. Akın A, Turan ME, Akın Ü. Problemli çevrimiçi oyun kullanımı ölçeği Türkçe formu: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Birey ve Toplum Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2015;5(2):65–78. [CrossRef ]
33. Ozdamar, K. Eğitim, sağlık ve davranış bilimlerinde ölçek ve test geliştirme yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Eskişehir: Nisan Yayıncılık; 2016.
34. Erdogan S, Nahcivan N, Esin MN. Research, process, application and critical in nursing. Istanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri; 2014.
35. Karagoz Y, Kosterelioglu I. Developing evaluation scale of communication skills with factor analysis. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences 2008;21:81–98.
36. Erefe I. Nursing research, principles, processes and methods. The nature of data collection tools. HEMAR-GE 2002;1:169–88.