Kerem BAŞARIR, Mustafa Onur KARACA, Mehmet ARMANGİL, Hüseyin Yusuf YILDIZ, Tülin ESMER, Ali Fırat ESMER

Patellar bone stock after extra-articular knee resection preserving extensor mechanism: A cadaveric study

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the thickness of the remaining patellar bone stock following extra-articular knee resection (EKR) preserving the extensor mechanism in human cadaveric knee joints.Methods: A total of 14 human cadaveric knee joints (8 men and 2 women) were dissected, and the patellar thickness from the joint capsule insertion to the anterior cortex of the patella was measured using an electronic caliper. The mean age of the cadavers was 37 years (range=28-50). Measurements were performed by an anatomist and an orthopedic surgeon. As the total number of the cadavers was not enough to show the patellar thickness with sampling (sex and age), we endeavored to supplement the content with magnetic resonance images (MRI). Accordingly, the patellar bone thickness was also measured on axial MRI scans of 100 adult and 25 pediatric knees of patients (71 women and 54 men; mean age=36 years; age range=7-67 years) admitted to our hospital in whom meniscal tears were suspected. The rate of specimens with remaining patellar thickness of less than 10 mm after presumed resection was evaluated. The macroscopic measurements in cadavers and MRI measurements in adult knees were compared statistically.Results: The mean thickness of the residual patellar bone of the cadaver dissections following a presumed EKR preserving the extensor mechanism was 8.2 mm (range=3.4-15.8). Additionally, in 71.4% (10/14) of the cadaveric knees, the thickness of residual patellar bone was less than 10 mm. In MRI scans, the average thickness of residual patella after presumed resection was 8.6 mm (range: 3.6-16) in adult knees and 6.9 mm (range: 3.4-10) in pediatric knees, and the residual patellar thickness less than 10 mm after presumed resection was determined in 72% of all MRI scans. Macroscopic measurements in cadaveric knees were statistically similar to MRI scan measurements in adult knees (p=0.765, Mann-Whitney U test).Conclusion: Evidence from this study revealed that the thickness of the remaining patellar bone stock after EKR preserving the extensor mechanism may be low. A preoperative assessment with MRI can guide the surgeon to select the appropriate method for knee resection in order to prevent from the complications of resected patella.

___

1. Eckardt J, Springfield D, Peabody T. Distal Femur. In: Simon MA, Springfield D, editors. Surgery for Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. p. 357-73.

2. Malawer M. Distal femoral resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction. In: Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001. p. 459-83. [Crossref]

3. Anract P, Missenard G, Jeanrot C, Dubois V, Tomeno B. Knee reconstruction with prosthesis and muscle flap after total arthrectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 384: 208-16. [Crossref]

4. Kendall SJ, Singer GC, Briggs TW, Cannon SR. A functional analysis of massive knee replacement after extra-articular resections of primary bone tumors. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 754-60. [Crossref]

5. Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao LA, Abalo E, Muscolo DL. Continuity and function of patellar tendon host-donor suture in tibial allograft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 450: 33-8. [Crossref]

6. Dominkus M, Sabeti M, Toma C, Abdolvahab F, Trieb K, Kotz RI. Reconstructing the extensor apparatus with a new polyester ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 453: 328-34. [Crossref]

7. Bickels J, Wittig JC, Kollender Y, et al. Reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after proximal tibia endoprosthetic replacement. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 856-62. [Crossref]

8. Dominkus M, Sabeti M, Kotz R. [Functional tendon repair in orthopedic tumor surgery]. Orthopade 2005; 34: 556-9. [Crossref]

9. Enneking WF, Shirley PD. Resection-arthrodesis for malignant and potentially malignant lesions about the knee using an intramedullary rod and local bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 59: 223-36. [Crossref]

10. Kotz R, Salzer M. Rotation-plasty for childhood osteosarcoma of the distal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64: 959-69. [Crossref]

11. Nakamura S, Kusuzaki K, Murata H, et al. Extra-articular wide tumor resection and limb reconstruction in malignant bone tumors invading the knee joint. Oncol Rep; 8: 365-8.

12. Zwolak P, Kühnel SP, Fuchs B. Extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas with preservation of the extensor mechanism: Surgical technique and review of cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 251-6. [Crossref]

13. Lie DTT, Gloria N, Amis AA, Lee BPH, Yeo SJ, Chou SM. Patellar resection during total knee arthroplasty: effect on bone strain and fracture risk. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13: 203-8. [Crossref]

14. Jujo Y, Yasui T, Nagase Y, Kadono Y, Oka H, Tanaka S. Patellar fracture after total knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 40-3. [Crossref]

15. Seo JG, Moon YW, Park SH, Lee JH, Kang HM, Kim SM. A case-control study of spontaneous patellar fractures following primary total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94: 908-13. [Crossref]

16. Fitzpatrick CK, Kim RH, Ali AA, Smoger LM, Rullkoetter PJ. Effects of resection thickness on mechanics of resurfaced patellae. J Biomech 2013; 46: 1568- 75. [Crossref]

17. Clarke HD, Spangehl MJ. Gender optimized patellar component designs are needed to better match female patellar anatomy. Knee 2014; 21: 1250-3. [Crossref]

18. Yoo JH, Yi SR, Kim JH. The geometry of patella and patellar tendon measured on knee MRI. Surg Radiol Anat 2007; 29: 623-8. [Crossref]

19. Eck JC, Aboulafia AJ. Endoprosthetic reconstruction for treatment of tumors about the knee. Curr Opin Orthop 2004; 15: 41-4. [Crossref]