Introduction: The aim of this biomechanical study was to evaluate the primary stability of the SportWelding® Sombrero 3.6 mm suture anchor system in osteopenic and healthy cadaveric humeri.Methods: The Sombrero® and BioCorkscrew® anchors were deployed in 8 osteopenic and 4 healthycadaver humeri after the bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the 32 specimens. Both anchorswere loaded with a USP Nr. 2 FiberWire® suture. An established cyclic testing protocol was performed.The maximum failure load (Fmax), the system displacement and the modes of failure were recorded.Results: The Fmaxand system displacement of the Sombrero® in osteopenic and healthy humeri wasequivalent to the Bio-Corkscrew® benchmark anchor; there were no signiŞcant differences in themaximum failure loads and system displacement values. Only anchor and suture dislocations wereobserved; suture ruptures did not occur.Conclusion: This study shows that the Sombrero® yields similar maximum failure loads and systemdisplacement values as the established Bio-Corkscrew® benchmark anchor. The primary stability of theSombrero® and Bio-Corkscrew® seems to be independent of the bone mineral quality. This relativelysmall-sized polymer anchor is independent of the BMD and may be an alternative to established sutureanchors in rotator cuff repair.
___
1. Pietschmann MF, Frohlich V, Ficklscherer A, et al. Suture anchor fixation strength in osteopenic versus non-osteopenic bone for rotator cuff repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Mar 2009;129(3):373e379.
2. Pietschmann MF, Gulecyuz MF, Fieseler S, et al. Biomechanical stability of knotless suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair in healthy and osteopenic bone. Arthroscopy. 2010 Aug;26(8):1035e1044.
3. Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Lehtinen J, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ. Anchor design and bone mineral density affect the pull-out strength of suture anchors in rotator cuff repair: which anchors are best to use in patients with low bone quality? Am J Sports Med. Sep 2004;32(6):1466e1473.
4. Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ. Pullout strength of suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair. J Bone Jt Surg Am. Nov 2003;85-A(11): 2190e2198.
5. Ferguson SJ, Weber U, von Rechenberg B, Mayer J. Enhancing the mechanical integrity of the implant-bone interface with BoneWelding technology: determination of quasi-static interfacial strength and fatigue resistance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. Apr 2006;77(1):13e20.
6. Heidenreich D, Langhoff JD, Nuss K, et al. The use of BoneWelding(R) technology in spinal surgery: an experimental study in sheep. Eur Spine J. 2011 Nov;20(11):1821e1836.
7. Langhoff JD, Kuemmerle JM, Mayer J, et al. An ultrasound assisted anchoring technique (BoneWelding technology) for fixation of implants to bone e A histological pilot study in sheep. Open Orthop J. 2009 Jun 11;3:40e47. https:// doi.org/10.2174/1874325000903010040.
8. Buijs GJ, van der Houwen EB, Stegenga B, Verkerke GJ, Bos RR. Mechanical strength and stiffness of the biodegradable SonicWeld Rx osteofixation system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Apr 2009;67(4):782e787.
9. Pilling E, Meissner H, Jung R, et al. An experimental study of the biomechanical stability of ultrasound-activated pinned (SonicWeld Rx?Resorb-X) and screwed fixed (Resorb-X) resorbable materials for osteosynthesis in the treatment of simulated craniosynostosis in sheep. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Sep 2007;45(6):451e456.
10. Volkel W, Pabst F, Klemm E. The use of resorbable osteosynthesis materials. Laryngorhinootologie. 2011 Jan;90(1):23e25.
11. Ammon JT, Nyland J, Chang HC, Burden R, Caborn DN. Evaluation of BioCorkscrew and Bioknotless RC suture anchor rotator cuff repair fixation: an in vitro biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Nov 2007;15(11):1375e1381.
12. Brady PC, Arrigoni P, Burkhart SS. What do you do when you have a loose screw? Arthroscopy. Sep 2006;22(9):925e930.
13. Chu T, McDonald E, Tufaga M, Kandemir U, Buckley J, Ma CB. Comparison of completely knotless and hybrid double-row fixation systems: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy. 2011 Apr;27(4):479e485.
14. Barber FA, Feder SM, Burkhart SS, Ahrens J. The relationship of suture anchor failure and bone density to proximal humerus location: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy. Jun 1997;13(3):340e345.
15. Schneeberger AG, von Roll A, Kalberer F, Jacob HA, Gerber C. Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study. J Bone Jt Surg Am. Dec 2002;84-A(12):2152e2160.
16. Burkhart SS, Diaz Pagan JL, Wirth MA, Athanasiou KA. Cyclic loading of anchorbased rotator cuff repairs: confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation. Arthroscopy. Dec 1997;13(6):720e724.
17. Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Beck M, Schlegel U. Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Jt Surg Br. May 1994;76(3):371e380.
18. Mahar A, Allred DW, Wedemeyer M, Abbi G, Pedowitz R. A biomechanical and radiographic analysis of standard and intracortical suture anchors for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. Feb 2006;22(2):130e135.
19. Pietschmann MF, Froehlich V, Ficklscherer A, Wegener B, Jansson V, Muller PE. Biomechanical testing of a new knotless suture anchor compared with established anchors for rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg. JuleAug 2008;17(4): 642e646.
20. Bartl R. Osteoporose: Pravention EUR e Diagnostik e Therapie. 4 ed. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag KG; 2011.
21. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Richards DP. Sutures and suture anchors: update 2003. Arthroscopy. Nov 2003;19(9):985e990.
22. Bisson LJ, Manohar LM. A biomechanical comparison of the pullout strength of No. 2 FiberWire suture and 2-mm FiberWire tape in bovine rotator cuff tendons. Arthroscopy. 2010 Nov;26(11):1463e1468.
23. Baleani M, Schrader S, Veronesi CA, Rotini R, Giardino R, Toni A. Surgical repair of the rotator cuff: a biomechanical evaluation of different tendon grasping and bone suture fixation techniques. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). Oct 2003;18(8): 721e729.
24. Bisson LJ, Manohar LM, Wilkins RD, Gurske-Deperio J, Ehrensberger MT. In- fluence of suture material on the biomechanical behavior of suture-tendon specimens: a controlled study in bovine rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med. May 2008;36(5):907e912.
25. Scheibel M. Recurrent defects of the rotary cuff : Causes and therapeutic strategies. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Nov;24(6):458e467.
26. Wintermantel E, Ha S-W. Biokompatible Werkstoffe und Bauweisen: Implantate für Medizin und Umwelt. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1996.
27. Wintermantel E, Ha S-W. Medizintechnik mit biokompatiblen Werkstoffen und Verfahren. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
28. Jockisch KA, Brown SA, Bauer TW, Merritt K. Biological response to choppedcarbon-fiber-reinforced peek. J Biomed Mater Res. Feb 1992;26(2):133e146.
29. Katzer A, Marquardt H, Westendorf J, Wening JV, von Foerster G. Polyetheretherketoneecytotoxicity and mutagenicity in vitro. Biomaterials. Apr 2002;23(8):1749e1759.
30. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. Nov 2007;28(32):4845e4869.
31. Bergsma EJ, Rozema FR, Bos RR, de Bruijn WC. Foreign body reactions to resorbable poly(L-lactide) bone plates and screws used for the fixation of unstable zygomatic fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Jun 1993;51(6):666e670.
32. Bergsma JE, de Bruijn WC, Rozema FR, Bos RR, Boering G. Late degradation tissue response to poly(L-lactide) bone plates and screws. Biomaterials. Jan 1995;16(1):25e31.
33. Spoliti M. Glenoid osteolysis after arthroscopic labrum repair with a bioabsorbable suture anchor. Acta Orthop Belg. Feb 2007;73(1):107e110.
34. Heidemann W, Fischer JH, Koebke J, Bussmann C, Gerlach KL. In vivo study of degradation of poly-(D,L-) lactide and poly-(L-lactide-co-glycolide) osteosynthesis material. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. Sep 2003;7(5):283e288.
35. Suuronen R, Pohjonen T, Hietanen J, Lindqvist C. A 5-year in vitro and in vivo study of the biodegradation of polylactide plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. May 1998;56(5):604e614. discussion 614e605.