Expectations in patients with total knee arthroplasty

Amaç: Total diz artroplastisinde (TDA) birincil amaç ağrının giderilmesi ve işlev gören bir diz eklemi elde edilmesidir. Bu konudaki savlar Doğu toplumlarında yaşam tarzı, kültür ve beklentiler açısından fazla diz fleksiyonunun gerekliliğini belirtmektedir. Bu nedenle yaşam tarzına ve kültürel alışkanlıklarla ilişkili olarak toplumlara özgü bilgilere gereksinim duyulmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı TDA uygulanan hastaların beklentilerinin incelenmesiydi. Çalışma planı: Çalışmaya gonartroz nedeniyle primer çimentolu TDA yapılan 131 hasta (18 erkek, 113 kadın; ortalama yaş: 66.2±8.3) alındı. Tüm hastalar aynı cerrah tarafından aynı cerrahi teknikle aynı implantlar kullanılarak ameliyat edildi. Hastalar Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) diz skalası, 15 sorudan oluşan klinik değerlendirme soru anketi ve HSS diz artroplastisi beklenti anketi ile değerlendirildiler. Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama HSS sağ diz skoru 89.2±10.5, sol diz skoru 89.6± 9.4 idi. Hastaların ameliyattan en fazla beklentileri; ağrının azalması (%99.2) ve yürümenin geliştirilmesi (%96.2) iken, en az beklentileri ise psikolojik iyilik halinin (%22.9) ve başkalarıyla iletişim kurma yeteneğinin gelişmesi (%35.1) oldu. Beklentiler eğitim düzeyi ve çalışma koşullarından etkilenmemekteydi. Çıkarımlar: Batı ve Amerikan toplumlarına benzer şekilde hastaların en önemli beklentileri ağrının giderilmesi ve fonksiyonların (yürüme, merdiven inip-çıkma, yardımcı cihaz kullanmamak) restorasyonu idi.

Total diz artroplastisi uygulanan hastaların beklentileri

Objective: The primary objective of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to decrease pain and restore functional knee joint. Current hypotheses indicate higher knee flexion is required in terms of life style, culture and expectations in Eastern communities. Therefore, society-specific features related to life style and cultural habits are needed. The objective of this study was to investigate the expectations of patients undergoing TKA. Methods: The study included 131 patients (18 male, 113 female; mean age: 66.2±8.3 years) who underwent cemented TKA due to knee osteoarthritis. All patients were operated by the same surgeon using the same implant and surgical technique. Patients were evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, a 15-item clinical knee assessment questionnaire and the HSS knee arthroplasty expectation questionnaire. Results: Mean HSS score for the right knee was 89.2±10.5 and for the left knee was 89.6±9.4. The two most expected outcomes were improvements in pain (99.2%) and gait (96.2%) and the two least expected outcomes were improvements in psychological well-being (22.9%) and communicative skills (35.1%). Expectations were not affected by education and working conditions. Conclusion: Patients’ most expected outcomes were improvement in pain and restoration of function (gait, climbing stairs and no need of assistive devices), similar to Western and American communities

___

  • 1. Bourne RB. Measuring tools for functional outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;(466):2634-8.
  • 2. Kim TK, Kwon SK, Kang YG, Chang CB, Seong SC. Functional disabilities and satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty in female Asian patients. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:458- 64.
  • 3. Hawker GA. Who, when, and why total joint replacement surgery? The patient's perspective. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2006;18:526-30.
  • 4. Hassaballa MA, Porteous AJ, Learmonth ID. Functional outcomes after different types of knee arthroplasty: kneeling ability versus descending stairs. Med Sci Monit 2007;13: CR77-81.
  • 5. Bakirhan S, Unver B, Karatosun V. Comparison of early postoperative functional activity levels of patients undergoing unilateral and bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2009;43:478-83.
  • 6. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Suarez-Alma ME. Determinants of function after total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 2003;83:696-706.
  • 7. Linsell L, Dawson J, Zondervan K, Rose P, Carr A, Randall T, et al. Pain and overall health status in older people with hip and knee replacement: a population perspective. J Public Health (Oxf) 2006;28:267-73.
  • 8. Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, et al. Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1016-22.
  • 9. Suarez-Almazor ME, Richardson M, Kroll TL, Sharf BF. A qualitative analysis of decision-making for total knee replacement in patients with osteoarthritis. J Clin Rheumatol 2010;16:158-63.
  • 10. Suda AJ, Seeger JB, Bitsch RG, Krueger M, Clarius M. Are patients' expectations of hip and knee arthroplasty fulfilled? A prospective study of 130 patients. Orthopedics 2010;33:76- 80.
  • 11. Rastogi R, Chesworth BM, Davis AM. Change in patient concerns following total knee arthroplasty described with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a repeated measures design. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008;6:112.
  • 12. Unver B, Karatosun V, Bakirhan S. Ability to rise independently from a chair during 6-month follow-up after unilateral and bilateral total knee replacement. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:385-7.
  • 13. Mancuso CA, Jout J, Salvati EA, Sculco TP. Fulfillment of patients' expectations for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:2073-8.
  • 14. Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, Jones EC, Robbins L, Warren RF, et al. Patients' expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:1005-12.
  • 15. Howell SM, Rogers SL. Method for quantifying patient expectations and early recovery after total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2009;32:884.
  • 16. Gonzalez Sáenz de Tejada M, Escobar A, Herrera C, García L, Aizpuru F, Sarasqueta C. Patient expectations and healthrelated quality of life outcomes following total joint replacement. Value Health 2010;13:447-54.
  • 17. Mancuso CA, Graziano S, Briskie LM, Peterson MG, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA, et al. Randomized trials to modify patients' preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:424-31.
  • 18. Hepinstall MS, Rutledge JR, Bornstein LJ, Mazumdar M, Westrich GH. Factors that impact expectations before total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:870-6.
  • 19. Tarabichi S, Tarabichi Y, Hawari M. Achieving deep flexion after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:219-24.
  • 20. Mulholland SJ, Wyss UP. Activities of daily living in non- Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 2001;24:191-8.
  • 21. Akagi M. Deep flexion in the Asian population. In: Bellemans J, Ries MD, Victor J, editors. Total knee arthroplasty: a guide to get better performance. Heidelberg: Springer; 2005. p. 311-22.
  • 22. Hussain W, Hussain H, Hussain M, Hussain S, Attar S. Approaching the Muslim orthopaedic patient. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:e2.
  • 23. Szabó G, Lovász G, Kustos T, Bener A. A prospective comparative analysis of mobility in osteoarthritic knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82:1167-9.
  • 24. McGee MA, Howie DW, Ryan P, Moss JR, Holubowycz OT. Comparison of patient and doctor responses to a total hip arthroplasty clinical evaluation questionnaire. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:1745-52.
  • 25. Ranawat CS, Shine JJ. Duo-condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973;(94):185-95.
  • 26. Unver B, Karatosun V, Bakirhan S. Effects of obesity on inpatient rehabilitation outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. Physiotherapy 2008;94:198-203.
  • 27. Unver B, Karatosun V, Bakirhan S, Gunal I. Effects of total knee arthroplasty on body weight and functional outcome. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 2009;21:201-6.
  • 28. Salmon P, Hall GM, Peerbhoy D, Shenkin A, Parker C. Recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty: patients' perspective on pain, function, quality of life, and well-being up to 6 months postoperatively. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:360-6.
  • 29. Park KK, Shin KS, Chang CB, Kim SJ, Kim TK. Functional disabilities and issues of concern in female Asian patients before TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;461:143-52.
  • 30. Kim TK, Chang CB, Kang YG, Kim SJ, Seong SC. Causes and predictors of patient's dissatisfaction after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:263-71.
  • 31. Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed N. Patient expectations predict greater pain relief with joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:716-21.
  • 32. Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:57-63.
  • 33. Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA, Kohl HW, Roberts S, Cook KF, et al. What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;(404):172-88.
  • 34. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:63-9.
  • 35. Bergés IM, Ottenbacher KJ, Smith PM, Smith D, Ostir GV. Perceived pain and satisfaction with medical rehabilitation after hospital discharge. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:724-30.
  • 36. Dunbar MJ, Robertsson O, Ryd L. What's all that noise? The effect of co-morbidity on health outcome questionnaire results after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:119-26.
  • 37. Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J. Total knee replacement. Curr Orthopaed 2005;19:446-52.
  • 38. Toye FM, Barlow J, Wright C, Lamb SE. Personal meanings in the construction of need for total knee replacement surgery. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:43-53.
  • 39. Dorr LD, Chao L. The emotional state of the patient after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;463:7-12.
  • 40. Noble PC, Gordon MJ, Weiss JM, Reddix RN, Conditt MA, Mathis KB. Does total knee replacement restore normal knee function? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;(431):157-65.
  • 41. Heck DA, Robinson RL, Partridge CM, Lubitz RM, Freund DA. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;(356):93-110.
  • 42. Callaghan JJ, Dysart SH, Savory CF, Hopkinson WJ. Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:1008- 9.
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica-Cover
  • ISSN: 1017-995X
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Tuberculosis of the pubic symphysis masquerading as osteitis pubis: a case report

Shailendra SINGH, Sumit ARORA, Sumit SURAL, Anıl DHAL

Tibial torsion: cause or consequence of osteoarthritis?

HASAN BOMBACI, Gamze KILIÇOĞLU, Gökhan ONUR, Serhat YANIK, Mücahit GÖRGEÇ

Ogilvie’s syndrome following bilateral knee arthroplasty: a case report

Aysun YILMAZLAR, REMZİ İŞÇİMEN, Ömer F. BİLGEN, Halil ÖZGÜÇ

Expectations in patients with total knee arthroplasty

Burcu TEKİN, BAYRAM ÜNVER, Vasfi KARATOSUN

Reconstruction of humeral diaphyseal non-unions with vascularized fibular graft

Tulgar TOROS, Kemal ÖZAKSAR, Tahir Sadık SÜGÜN, Fuat ÖZERKAN

The results of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) in distal and diaphyseal tibial fractures

Mehmet Atıf Erol AKSEKİLLİ, İsmail ÇELİK, Arslan Kağan ARSLAN, Tuğhan KALKAN, MAHMUT UĞURLU

Use of a perichondrial autograft on the peritendinous adhesion: an experimental study in rabbits

Saime İRKÖREN, CENK DEMİRDÖVER, Bekir Zafer AKAD, Zeynep AYTUĞ, Elif YILMAZ, Yücel ÖZTAN

Evaluation of the effects of disabilities due to traffic accidents on the quality of life using SF-36 health survey

Nursel BİLGİN GAMSIZ, ERTAN MERT, MELEK SEZGİN

Intraobserver reliability of modified Ashworth scale and modified Tardieu scale in the assessment of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy

AYŞE NUMANOĞLU AKBAŞ, MİNTAZE KEREM GÜNEL

Extraskeletal osteosarcoma: a case report

Andreas F. MAVROGENIS, Ellada PAPADOGEORGOU, Panayiotis J. PAPAGELOPOULOS