Do hand outcome measures reflect cultural influences?
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the activities listed in DASH, MHQ, QuickDASH with theactivities listed in Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in a Turkish patient populationwith hand injury.Methods: COPM questionnaire was administered to 163 participants (61 male and 102 female; mean age40.72± 13.70 years). The activities that were stated in COPM were categorized and checked whether theywere present in DASH-T, MHQ, QuickDASH.Results: The highest rated stated activities were“carrying a heavy object” (39.2%), “cleaning the house”(25.7%) and“writing” (15.9%). DASH reflects 30% whereas MHQ and QuickDASH reflect 16.32% and 10.2%of the problematic activities, respectively.Conclusion: None of three questionnaires have satisfactory results for reflecting the problematic activities among hand injured Turkish people. Open ended interviews should be irrevocable part of assessment process in order to describe a person-center treatment program.
___
1. van de Ven-Stevens LA, Munneke M, Terwee CB, Spauwen PH, van der Linde H.Clinimetric properties of instruments to assess activities in patients with handinjury: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(1):151e169.2. Che Daud AZ, Yau MK, Barnett F, Judd J. Occupation-based intervention in hand injury rehabilitation: experiences of occupational therapists in Malaysia. Scan JOccup Ther. 2015;23(1):57e66.
3. Schoneveld K, Wittink H, Takken T. Clinimetric evaluation of measurement tools used in hand therapy to assess activity and participation. J Hand Ther.2009;22(3):221e236.
4. Roley S, DeLany JV, Barrows C, Honaker D, Sava D, Talley V. Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process 2nd Edition. Bethesda, MD: The American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc; 2008.
5. Black RM. Cultural considerations of hand use. J Hand Ther. 2011;24(2): 104e111.
6. Hudak PL, Amadio P, Bombardier C. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH(disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602e608.
7. Chung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validitytesting of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg.1998;23(4):575e587.
8. Naidu SH, Panchik D, Chinchilli VM. Development and validation of the handassessment tool. J Hand Ther. 2009;22(3):250e257.
9. Giladi AM, Chung KC. Measuring outcomes in hand surgery. Clin Plast Surg.2013;40(2):313e322.
10. Düger T, Yakut E, Oksüz Ç, Y € orükan S, Bilgütay B, Ayhan Ç. Reliability and € validity of the Turkish version of the disabilities of the arm. Shoulder Hand (DASH) Questionnaire[Article in Turkish] Fizyoter Rehabil. 2006;17(3):99e107.
11. Oksüz Ç, Akel BS, Oskay D, Leblebicio € glu G, Hayran KM. Cross-cultural adap- tation, validation, and reliability process of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in a Turkish population. J Hand Surg. 2011;36(3):486e492.
12. Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: CAOTPublications; 1998.
13. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Jt Surg. 2005;87(5):1038e1046.
14. Dogan SK, Ay S, Evcik D, Baser O. Adaptation of Turkish version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(2):185e191.
15. Munoz-Neira C, L ~ opez OL, Riveros R, Nú nez-Huasaf J, Flores P, Slachevsky A. ~The technologyeactivities of daily living questionnaire: a version with atechnology-related subscale. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;33(6):361e371.
16. Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord.2003;4(1):11.
17. Jester A, Harth A, Wind G, Germann G, Sauerbier M. Disabilities of the arm,shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire: determining functional activityprofiles in patients with upper extremity disorders. J Hand Surg. 2005;30(1):23e28.
18. Changulani M, Okonkwo U, Keswani T, Kalairajah Y. Outcome evaluationmeasures for wrist and handewhich one to choose? Int Orthop. 2008;32(1):1e6.
19. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of healthrelatedquality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417e1432.
20. Dixon D, Johnston M, McQueen M. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder andHand Questionnaire (DASH) can measure the impairment, activity limitationsand participation restriction constructs from the International Classification ofFunctioning, Disability and Health (ICF). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9(1):114.
21. Drummond AS, Sampaio RF, Mancini MC, Kirkwood RN, Stamm TA. Linking the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand to the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. J Hand Ther. 2007;20(4):336e344.
22. Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Recommendations for theCross-cultural Adaptation of Health Status Measures. New York: AmericanAcademy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2002:1e9.
23. Case-Smith J. Outcomes in hand rehabilitation using occupational therapyservices. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57(5):499e506.
24. Aasheim T, Finsen V. The DASH and the QuickDASH instruments. Normativevalues in the general population in Norway. J Hand Surg. 2014;39(2):140e144.
25. Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm,shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability basedon responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord.2006;7(1):44.
26. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, et al. Linking health-status measurements to theinternational classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med.2002;34(5):205e210.
27. Franchignoni F, Vercelli S, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Bravini E, Ferriero G. Minimalclinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and handoutcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). J OrthopSports Phys Ther. 2014;44(1):30e39.
- ISSN: 1017-995X
- Başlangıç: 2015
- Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler
A novel anatomical patellar plate for transverse patellar fracture - A biomechanical in-vitro study
Ahmet KARAKAŞLI, Nihat ACAR, Fatih ERTEM, Ramazan OZMANEVRA, MEHMET ERDURAN
Volar dislocation of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb: A case report
Serdar YÜKSEL, Oktay ADANIR, Ozan BEYTEMÜR, MEHMET AKİF GÜLEÇ
Optimal trajectory and insertion accuracy of sacral alar iliac screws
Katsutaka YAMADA, Takayuki HİGASHİ, Kanichiro KANEKO, Manabu IDE, Tatsuhiro SEKİYA, Tomoyuki SAİTO
Fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis and treatment of musculoskleletal tumours
Pedro CARDOSO, Joao ROSA, Joao ESTEVES, Vania OLİVEİRA, Ricardo RODRİGUES-PİNTO
The timing and importance of motor skills course in knee arthroscopy training
Engin ÇETİNKAYA, Hakan ÇİFT, Ahmet AYBAR, Ersin ERÇİN, Gamze GÜLER BABÜR, OĞUZ ŞÜKRÜ POYANLI
Shengping YANG, Changxian CHEN, Hanlong WANG, Zhiqiang WU, Lianqun LİU
Hakan ÇİÇEK, Ümit TUHANİOĞLU, Hasan Ulaş OĞUR, Fırat SEYFETTİNOĞLU, OSMAN ÇİLOĞLU, TAHSİN BEYZA BEYZADEOĞLU
YUSUF ÖZTÜRKMEN, Yunus Emre AKMAN, Ethem Ayhan ÜNKAR, Erhan ŞÜKÜR
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the craniocervical junction; case report and review
Ali Ender OFLUOĞLU, Mehmet AYDOĞAN, Uzay ERDOĞAN, Önder OFLUOĞLU
Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish version of Hip Outcome Score
GÖKHAN POLAT, DERYA ÇELİK, Hilal ÇİL, Mehmet ERDİL, MEHMET AŞIK