Single anterior portal: A better option for arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability?

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare single and double anterior portal techniques in thearthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability.Methods: A total of 91 cases who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instabilitywere reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups as Group 1 (47 male and 2 female; mean age:25.8± 6.8) for arthroscopic single anterior portal approach and Group 2 (41 male and 1 female; meanage: 25.4± 6.6) for the classical anterior double portal approach. The groups were compared for clinicalscores, range of motion, analgesia requirement, complications, duration of surgery, cost and learningcurve according to a short questionnaire completed by the relevant healthcare professionals.Results: No statistically signiŞcant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of pre-operativeand post-operative Constant and Rowe Shoulder Scores, range of motion and complications (p> 0.05). InGroup 2 patients, the requirement for post-operative analgesics was signiŞcantly higher (p < 0.001),whereas the duration of surgery was statistically signiŞcantly shorter in Group 1 (p < 0.001). In theassessment of the questionnaire, it was seen that a single portal anterior approach was preferred at ahigher ratio (p¼ 0.035). The cost analysis revealed that the cost was 5.7% less for patients with a singleportal.Conclusion: In the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability accompanied by aBankart lesion, the anterior single portal technique is as successful in terms of clinical results as theconventional double portal approach. The single portal technique has advantages such as less postoperative pain, a shorter surgical learning curve and lower costs.Level of Evidence: Level III, Therapeutic study.

___

1. Dodson CC, Cordasco FA. Anterior glenohumeral joint dislocations. Orthop ClinNorth Am. 2008;39:507e518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2008.06.001.

2. Hovelius L, Augustini BG, Fredin H, Johansson O, Norlin R, Thorling J. Primaryanterior dislocation of the shoulder in young patients. A ten-year prospectivestudy. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1996;78:1677e1684.

3. Taylor DC, Arciero RA. Pathologic changes associated with shoulder dislocations. Arthroscopic and physical examination findings in first-time, traumatic anterior dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:306e311. PMID: 9167808,http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/036354659702500306.

4. Norlin R. Intraarticular pathology in acute, first-time anterior shoulder dislocation:anarthroscopic study. Arthroscopy. 1993;9:546e549. PMID: 7818617.

5. Liavaag S, Brox JI, Pripp AH, Enger M, Soldal LA, Svenningsen S. Immobilizationin external rotation after primary shoulder dislocation did not reduce the riskof recurrence: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2011;93:. 897e904. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00416. Epub 2011 Apr 15

6. Matsui Y, Omachi T. New secure relay technique for arthroscopic Bankart repair without making an additional working portal. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(1):113e118. PMID: 15650677, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.04.037.

7. Armangil M, Basat HÇ, Akan B, Karaduman M, Demirtas¸ M. Arthroscopic stabilization of anterior shoulder instability using a single anterior portal. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(1):6e12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3944/ AOTT.2015.14.0035.

8. Steinbeck J, Jerosch J. Arthroscopic transglenoid stabilization versus open anchor suturing in traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:373e378. PMID: 9617398, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465980-260030501.

9. Angelo RL. Controversies in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: arthroscopic versusopen Bankart repair, thermal treatment of capsular tissue, acromioplasties-arethey necessary? Arthroscopy. 2003;19(Suppl 1):224e228. PMID: 14673442,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2003.10.005.

10. Nelson BJ, Arciero RA. Arthroscopic management of glenohumeral instability.Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:602e614. PMID: 10921658, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465000280042801.

11. Fabbriciani C, Milano G, Demontis A, Fadda S, Ziranu F, Mulas PD. Arthroscopic versus open treatment of Bankart lesion of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:456e462. PMID: 15122134, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.03.001.

12. Green MR, Christensen KP. Arthroscopic versus open Bankart procedures: a comparison of early morbidity and complications. Arthroscopy. 1993;9: 371e374. PMID: 8216566.

13. Jorgensen U, Svend-Hansen H, Bak K, Pedersen I. Recurrent post-traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation-open versus arthroscopic repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7:118e124. PMID: 10223535, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001670050133.

14. Cole BJ, L'Insalata J, Irrgang J, Warner JJ. Comparison of arthroscopic and openanterior shoulder stabilization. A two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg[Am]. 2000;82:1108e1114. PMID: 10954100.

15. Gerber C, Nyffeler RW. Classification of glenohumeral joint instability. ClinOrthop Relat Res. 2002;400:65e76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200207000-00009.

16. Hunt SA, Kwon YW, Zuckerman JD. The rotator interval: anatomy, pathology,and strategies for treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:218e227. PMID:17426293.

17. Leedle BP, Miller MD. Pullout strength of knotless suture anchors. Arthroscopy.2005;21(1):81e85. PMID: 15650671, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.08.011.

18. Randelli P, Arrigoni P, Polli L, Cabitza P, Denti M. Quantification of active ROMafter arthroscopic Bankart repair with rotator interval closure. Orthopedics.2009;32(6):408. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20090511-07.

19. Harryman DT, Sidles JA, Harris SL, Matsen FA. The role of the rotator intervalcapsule in passive motion and stability of the shoulder. J Bone Jt Surg Am.1992;74:53e66. PMID: 1734014.

20. Chechik O, Maman E, Dolkart O, Khashan M, Shabtai L, Mozes G. Arthroscopicrotator interval closure in shoulder instability repair: a retrospectivestudy. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19(7):1056e1062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.03.001.

21. Cole BJ, Mazzocca AD, Meneghini RM. Indirect arthroscopic rotator intervalrepair. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:e28ee31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(03)00384-0.

22. Shibano K, Koishi H, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. Effect of Bankart repair on the loss of range of motion and the instability of the shoulder joint for recurrentanterior shoulder dislocation. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23(6):888e894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Dec 2.

23. Ng DZ, Kumar VP. Arthroscopic Bankart repair using knot-tying versus knotlesssuture anchors: is there a difference? Arthroscopy. 2014;30(4):422e427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.01.005.

24. Kocaoglu B, Guven O, Nalbantoglu U, Aydin N, Haklar U. No difference betweenknotless sutures and suture anchors in arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesions incollision athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(7):844e849.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0811-3. Epub 2009 Apr 29.

25. Hayashida K, Yoneda M, Mizuno N, Fukushima S, Nakagawa S. Arthroscopic Bankart repair with knotless suture anchor for traumatic anterior shoulder instability: results of short-term follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(6):620e626. PMID: 16762700, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.03.006.

26. Cvetanovich GL, McCormick F, Erickson BJ, et al. The posterolateral portal:optimizing anchor placement and labral repair at the inferior glenoid. ArthroscTech. 2013;2(3):e201ee204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2013.02.011, 31.

27. Adams BA, Garrett WH, Wright GB, Khan MW, Taylor JB, Nord KD. A noveltechnique for advancing the inferior labrum in a bankart repair. Arthrosc Tech.2013; 6;2(2):e121ee124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2012.12.006
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica-Cover
  • ISSN: 1017-995X
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the craniocervical junction; case report and review

Ali Ender OFLUOĞLU, Mehmet AYDOĞAN, Uzay ERDOĞAN, Önder OFLUOĞLU

A systematic review of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty/percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Shengping YANG, Changxian CHEN, Hanlong WANG, Zhiqiang WU, Lianqun LİU

Do hand outcome measures reflect cultural influences?

ÇİĞDEM ÖKSÜZ, BURCU SEMİN AKEL, ORKUN TAHİR ARAN, Ilkem Ceren SIĞIRTMAÇ, A.Gürsel LEBLEBİCİOĞLU

The timing and importance of motor skills course in knee arthroscopy training

Engin ÇETİNKAYA, Hakan ÇİFT, Ahmet AYBAR, Ersin ERÇİN, Gamze GÜLER BABÜR, OĞUZ ŞÜKRÜ POYANLI

Fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis and treatment of musculoskleletal tumours

Pedro CARDOSO, Joao ROSA, Joao ESTEVES, Vania OLİVEİRA, Ricardo RODRİGUES-PİNTO

Evaluation of thoracic vertebrae rotation in patients with pectus excavatum

Ryszard TOMASZEWSKİ, Lukasz WİKTOR, Ludwina MACHALA

Single anterior portal: A better option for arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability?

Hakan ÇİÇEK, Ümit TUHANİOĞLU, Hasan Ulaş OĞUR, Fırat SEYFETTİNOĞLU, OSMAN ÇİLOĞLU, TAHSİN BEYZA BEYZADEOĞLU

The relation between elbow range of motion and patient satisfaction after open release of stiff elbow

Hakan GÜNDEŞ, ÖZGÜR SELEK, Ümit GÖK, Bora GÜMÜŞLÜ, Levent BULUÇ

Volar dislocation of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb: A case report

Serdar YÜKSEL, Oktay ADANIR, Ozan BEYTEMÜR, MEHMET AKİF GÜLEÇ

A comparison of rat degloving injury models

SERDAR ALTUN, Hakan ORBAY, Mehmet EKİNCİ, Ahmet ÇETİNBAŞ, Ali BAL, Enver ARPACI, Mehmet Ihsan OKUR