Distal biseps tendon yırtıklarında primer tamir sonuçları

Amaç: Çalışmada distal biseps tendon yırtıklarında primer tamirin uzun dönem sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi amaçlandı. Çalışma planı: Distal biseps tendon yırtığı nedeniyle primer tamir uygulanmış olan hastalar retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Tüm hastalara tek insizyon üzerinden anterior yaklaşımla pullu vida (modifiye McReynolds yöntemi) veya Mitek ankor kullanılarak anatomik tamir uygulandı. Sonuçlar hastaların 2011 yılı sonundaki klinik ve radyolojik incelemelerine ve DASH skorlarına göre değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Toplam 21 hastaya (21 erkek; ortalama yaş 47.5) distal biseps tendon yırtığı tanısı ile cerrahi tedavi uygulanmıştı. Tendon tespitinde 11 hastada modifiye McReynolds tekniği, 10 hastada ise Mitek ankor kullanılmıştı. Modifiye McReynold tekniği hastaların % 63.6’sında mükemmel sonuç verirken, hastaların %9.1’inde implant yetersizliği görüldü ve ortalama DASH skoru 7.8 olarak saptandı. Mitek ankor ile tespit uygulanan hastaların ise %60’ında mükemmel sonuç alınırken, %10 implant yetersizliği saptandı ve ortalama DASH skoru 7.4 olarak bulundu. Çıkarımlar: Distal biseps yırtıklarının primer cerrahi tedavisi uzun dönem sonuçları açısından etkili ve güvenli bir yöntem olarak görünmektedir.

The results of primary repair after distal biceps tendon rupture

Objective: The aim of the study was to present the long term results of primary tenodesis in the treatment of distal biceps tendon rupture.Methods: Patients previously treated for distal tendon rupture were evaluated. In all cases anatomical reattachment with a single-incision through the anterior approach was performed with either a screw and washer (modified McReynolds technique) or a Mitek Anchor. Analysis was performed using clinical and radiological examination and DASH score at the end of 2011.Results: Twenty-one patients (21 males; mean age: 47.5 years) were treated for distal biceps tendon rupture. Fixation was performed using the modified McReynolds technique in 11 and Mitek Anchor in 10 patients. The McReynold technique had excellent result in 63.6% of patients, a 9.1% risk of implant failure and a mean DASH score of 7.8. The Mitek Anchor technique had excellent result in 60% of patients, a 10% risk of implant failure and a mean DASH score of 7.4.Conclusion: Operative treatment for distal biceps tendon rupture appears to be a safe and effective method and consistently yields good results. 

___

  • Acquaviva P. Rupture du tendon inferieur du biceps brachial droit a son insertion sur la tuberosite bicipitale, tenosuture success operatoire. Marseille Med 1898;35:570-3.
  • Lorbach O, Kieb M, Grim C, Engelhardt M. Proximal and distal rupture of the m. biceps brachii. [Article in German] Orthopade 2010;39: 1117-22.
  • Agins HJ, Chess JL, Hoekstra DV, Teitge RA. Rupture of the distal insertion of the biceps brachii tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;(234):34-8.
  • Baker BE, Bierwagen D. Rupture of the distal tendon of the biceps brachii. Operative versus non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:414-7.
  • Behounek J, Hrubina M, Skotak M, Krumpl O, Zahalka M, Dvorak J, et al. Evaluation of surgical repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures. Acta Chir orthop Traum Czech 2009;76: 47O´Driscoll SW, Goncalves LBJ, Dietz P. The Hook test for distal biceps tendon avulsion. Am J Sports Med 2007;35: 1865Janda V. Muscle function testing. Butterworths: London; 19
  • Frank C, Lardner R, Page P. The assessment and treatment of muscular imbalance – The Janda approach hardback. Book review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2010;14:287-8.
  • Miyamoto RG, Elser F, Millett PJ. Distal biceps tendon injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:2128-38.
  • Hargrove R, Griffiths DE, Clasper J. Ruptured distal biceps in military personel. J R Army Med Corps 2006;152:26-9.
  • Safran MR, Graham SM. Distal biceps tendon ruptures: incidence, demographics, and the effect of smoking. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;(404):275-83.
  • Chillemi C, Marinelli M, De Cupis V. Ruture of the distal biceps brachii tendon: conservative treatment versus anatomic reinsertion – clinical and radiological evaluation after 2 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007;127:705-8.
  • Freeman CR, McCormick KR, Mahoney D, Baratz M, Lubahn JD. Nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures compared with a historical control group. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:2329-34.
  • Boyd MM, Anderson LD. A method of reinsertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1961;43: 1041McReynolds IS. Avulsion of the insertion of the biceps brachii tendon and its surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1963;45:1780-1.
  • Verhaven E, Huylebroek J, Van Nieuwenhuysen W, Van Overschelde J. Surgical treatment of acute biceps tendon ruptures with a suture anchor. Acta Orthop Belg 1993;59: 426-9. Silva J, Eskander MS, Lareau C, DeAngelis NA. Treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures using a single-incision technique and a Bio–Tenodesis screw. Orthopedics 2010;33:477.
  • Grewal R, Athwal GS, MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, Drosdowech DS, El-Hawary R, et al. Single versus doubleincision technique for the repair of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1166-74.
  • Khan AD, Penna S, Yin Q, Sinopidis C, Brownson P, Frostick SP. Repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures using suture anchors through a single anterior incision. Arthroscopy 2008; 24:39-45.
  • McKee MD, Hirji R, Schemitsch EH, Wild LM, Waddel JP. Patient-oriented functional outcome after repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures using a single-incision technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005;14:302-6.
  • John CK, Field LD, Weiss KS, Savoie FH 3rd. Single incision repair of acute distal biceps ruptures by use of suture anchors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;16:78-83.
  • Eardley WGP, Odak S, Adesina TS, Jeavons RP, McVie JL. Bioabsorbable interference screw fixation of distal biceps ruptures through a single anterior incision: a single-surgeon case series and review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010;130:875-81.
  • Cill A, Merten S, Steinmann SP. Immediate active range of motion after modified 2-incision repair in acute distal biceps tendon rupture. Am J Sports Med 2009;37:130-5.
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica-Cover
  • ISSN: 1017-995X
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Trapezoid kemik ve trikuetral kemik osteoblastomu: İki olgu sunumu

Ibrahim Kaya, Burak Boynuk, Caner Gunerbuyuk, Akin Ugras

Birinci distal metatarsal artiküler set açısı ölçümüne pronasyon ve inklinasyonun etkisi

Gokhan CAKMAK, Ulunay Kanatli, Baris KİLİNC, Haluk Yetkin

Omurgada metastatik hastalık belirteci olarak anevrizmal kemik kisti benzeri alanlar

Emre Karadeniz, Simone Colangeli, Riccardo Ghermandi, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Emre Acaroglu, Stefano Boriani

Kalça artroplastisi uygulanan hastalarda koksartroz etiyolojisi

Cagatay ULUCAY, Turhan OZLER, Melih GUVEN, Budak AKMAN, Abdurrahman Onur KOCADAL, Faik ALTİNTAS

İpsilateral humerus diafiz kırığı ile birlikte humerus proksimal uç kırıklı çıkığı: İki olgu sunumu

Jae-Myeung Chun, Aditya Pawaskar, In-Ho Jeon

Distal biseps tendon yırtıklarında primer tamir sonuçları

Maros HRUBİNA, Jiri BEHOUNEK, Miroslav SKOTAK, Oldrich KRUMPL, Pavel MİKA, Deniz OLGUN

Elit genç futbolcularda yaralanmalar: Prospektif üç yıllık çalışma

Metin ERGUN, H. Nevzad DENEREL, Mehmet S. BİNNET, K. Ahmet ERTAT

Poroz kaplı, vidalı çimentosuz total diz artroplastisinin uzun dönem sonuçları

İbrahim AZBOY, Abdullah DEMİRTAS, Mehmet BULUT, Yusuf OZTURKMEN, Erhan SUKUR, Mustafa CANİKLİOGLU

Kemik grefti biyomalzeme uygulamaları için toz balık başlarının nitelendirilmesi

Mustafa Oteyaka, Hasan Unal, Namik Bilici, Eda Tasci

Düşük ve yüksek enerjili kırık sonrası kemik mineral yoğunluk testi ve osteoporoz tedavisinin prevalansı

Chayanin ANGTHONG, Santi RODJANAWİJITKUL, Supawat SAMART, Wirana ANGTHONG