Comparison of accordion maneuver with compression technique alone for the treatment of atrophic fracture nonunion: A rabbit model
Comparison of accordion maneuver with compression technique alone for the treatment of atrophic fracture nonunion: A rabbit model
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the histological results of Accordion Maneuver (AM) with Compression Technique Alone (CA) in the treatment of atrophic fracture nonunion in a rabbit model. Methods: The study was performed on 91 male New Zealand rabbits aged six months, weighing 3.1 to 3.6 kg. The standardized models of atrophic nonunion with a 3-mm fracture were created in the tibias of rats. For the histomorphological study, 22 rabbits were randomly selected and sacrificed. The remaining 69 rabbits were divided into two groups based on the treatment technique: Group AM (n = 36) and Group CA (n = 33). The group AM was further randomly divided into four subgroups based on the amplitude and interval parameters: subgroup A1B1 (0 day, 4 mm; n = 9), subgroup A1B2 (0 day, 8 mm; n = 7), subgroup A2B1 (6 days, 4 mm; n = 10), and subgroup A2B2 (6 days, 8 mm; n = 10). A monolateral external fixator was employed in each group. Animals were sacrificed 6 weeks after the treatment, and bony healing was assessed both radiologically and histologically. The efficiency of bony healing was assessed using the bone content index, bone mineral density, and bone volume fraction indexes. Results: In X-ray and micro-computed tomography assessments, periosteal reaction was detected at the fracture site in all specimens. In group CA, sclerosis was observed at the ends of the fragments. Bony absorption, nonunion, and a little amount of island-like high density were also observed at the nonunion site. Among AM subgroups, sparse callus-like bone formation in A1B1 subgroup and a high density of callus connecting most parts of the gap and large amount of periosteal callus formation in A1B1 subgroup were observed. In A2B2 subgroup, the cortex was initially connected. No gap was observed, and the medullary cavity was recanalized. In histological analyses, the intermission of 0 day at rate of 8 mm was of the highest level of bony regeneration, and the intermission of 6 days at the rate of 4 mm was of the lowest level of bony regeneration (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Based on the radiological and histological results obtained from the present study, AM seems to be more effective than CA in treating atrophic nonunion. AM can shorten the period of treatment. The interval of 0 day and an amplitude of 8 mm may be more proper for AM.
___
- 1. Tawonsawatruk T, West CC, Murray IR, Soo C, Péault B, Simpson AH. Adipose derived pericytes rescue fractures from a failure of healing—Non-union. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):22779. 10.1038/srep22779
- 2. Lai PJ, Hsu YH, Chou YC, Yeh WL, Ueng SWN, Yu YH. Augmentative antirotational plating provided a significantly higher union rate than exchanging reamed nailing in treatment for femoral shaft aseptic atrophic nonunion— Retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20:127. 10.1186/ s12891-019-2514-3
- 3. Milenkovic S, Mitkovic M, Mitkovic M. External fixation of segmental tibial shaft fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018;31 1123-1127 ([Epub ahead of print]). 10.1007/s00068-018-1041-5
- 4. Makhdom AM, Cartaleanu AS, Rendon JS, Villemure I, Hamdy RC. The accordion maneuver: A noninvasive strategy for absent or delayed callus formation in cases of limb lengthening. Adv Orthop. 2015:912790. 10.1155/2015/912790
- 5. Stewart SK. Fracture non-union: A review of clinical challenges and future research needs. Malays Orthop J. 2019;13:1-10. 10.5704/MOJ.1907.001
- 6. Frölke JPM, Patka P. Definition and classification of fracture non-unions. Injury. 2007;38:S19-S22. 10.1016/S0020-1383(07)80005-2
- 7. Anuj J, Sudhir K, Aditya NA, Nitesh J. Augmentation of bone healing in delayed and atrophic nonunion of fractures of long bones by partially decalcified bone allograft (decal bone). Indian J Orthop. 2015;49:637-642. 10.4103/0019-5413. 168764
- 8. Karakoyun Ö, Küçükkaya M, Erol MF. Does lengthening after acute correction negatively affect bone healing during distraction osteogenesis? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49:405-409. 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0275
- 9. Baruah RK, Haque R. Accordion maneuver with modified Ilizarov frame for treatment of recalcitrant nonunion of shaft of femur in a patient with pycnodysostosis. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016;7(Suppl 1):45-47. 10.1016/j.jcot. 2016.09.006
- 10. Sarisozen B, Bilgen MS, Dinc M, Aksakal AM, Coskun E. The effect of tibial lengthening on gastrosoleus muscle function: An electrophysiological study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009;43:277-282. 10.3944/AOTT.2009.277
- 11. Gershon V, Haim S. Management of delayed union, non-union and mal-union of long bone fractures. Eur Surg Orthop Traumatol. 2014;22:241-266. 10.1007/ 978-3-642-34746-7_10
- 12. Inan M, Karaoglu S, Cilli F, Turk CY, Harma A. Treatment of femoral nonunions by using cyclic compression and distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005(436):222-228. 10.1097/01.blo.0000159153.09508.97
- 13. Brownlow HC, Simpson AH. Metabolic activity of a new atrophic nonunion model in rabbits. J Orthop Res. 2000;18:438-442. 10.1002/jor.1100180316
- 14. Brinker MR, O’Connor DP. Ilizarov compression over a nail for aseptic femoral nonunions that have failed exchange nailing: A report of five cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:668-676. 10.1097/00005131-200311000-00002
- 15. Menon DK, Dougall TW, Pool RD, Simonis RB. Augmentative Ilizarov external fixation after failure of diaphyseal union with intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:491-497. 10.1097/00005131-200208000-00007
- 16. Claes L, Augat P, Schorlemmer S, Konrads C, Ignatius A, Ehrnthaller C. Temporary distraction and compression of a diaphyseal osteotomy accelerates bone healing. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:772-727. 10.1002/jor.20588
- 17. Kim UK, Chung IK, Lee KH, Swift JQ, Seong WJ, Ko CC. Bone regeneration in mandibular distraction osteogenesis combined with compression stimulation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1498-1505. 10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.028
- 18. Ochareon P, Herring SW. Growing the mandible: Role of the periosteum and its cells. Anat Rec. 2007;290:1366-1376. 10.1002/ar.20588
- 19. Foolen J, van Donkelaar CC, Ito K. Intracellular tension in periosteum/perichondrium cells regulates long bone growth. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:84-91. 10. 1002/jor.21224
- 20. Golyakhovsky V, Frankel V. Operative Manual of Ilizarov Techniques. St. Louis: Mosby-Yearbook, Inc.; 1993:146-148. 10.4236/ojo.2014.47030
- 21. Kulkarni GS. Principles and practice of deformity correction. Indian J Orthop. 2004;38:191-198. 10.1007/978-3-319-59713-3_36
- 22. Meyer U, Meyer T, Wiesmann HP, et al. The effect of magnitude and frequency of interfragmentary strain on the tissue response to distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:1331-1339. 10.1016/S0278- 2391(99)90872-8
- 23. Aronson J, Shen X. Experimental healing of distraction osteogenesis comparing metaphyseal with diaphyseal sites. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;301:25-30. 10. 1097/00003086-199404000-00005
- 24. Cansü E, Ünal MB, Parmaksızoğlu F, Gürcan S. Distraction lengthening of the proximal phalanx in distal thumb amputations. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49:227-232. 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0292
- 25. Özdel A, Sarısözen B, Yalçınkaya U, Demirağ B. The effect of HIF stabilizer on distraction osteogenesis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49:80-84. 10.3944/ AOTT.2015.14.0006
- 26. Aronson J, Good B, Stewart C, Harrison B, Harp J. Preliminary studies of mineralization during distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250:43-49. 10.1007/978-3-319-59713-3_36
- 27. Krishnan A, Pamecha C, Patwa JJ. Modified Ilizarov technique for infected nonunion of the femur: The principle of distraction-compression osteogenesis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2006;14:265-272. 10.1177/ 230949900601400307
- 28. Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR. The mechanics of external fixation. HSS J. 2007;3:13-29. 10.1007/s11420-006-9025-0