Özgün Barış GÜNTÜRK, Murat KAYALAR, Zülfükar BALİ, Kemal ÖZAKSAR, Tulgar TOROS, Yusuf GÜRBÜZ

Clinical outcomes of salvage revision surgery following finger replantation with vascular insufficiency: A retrospective study

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of revision surgery following replantation of single digital amputations.Methods: In this study, first, a total of 403 patients (339 male, 64 female; mean age=28 years; age range=1-76) in whom a single finger replantation was performed were retrospectively reviewed, and then 60 patients with arterial or venous insufficiency in whom revision surgery was performed were reanalyzed. The second finger was observed to be the most injured one (32.8%). Injury type was classified as clean cut (25.3%), local crush (38.7), extensive crush (7.9%), and avulsion (28.1%). When taking the levels of injuries of the artery-only finger replantations into account, one finger (0.8%) was nail distal third, 70 fingers (56%) were nail distal third to lunula, 43 fingers (34.4%) were lunula to distal phalanx basis, 10 fingers (8%) were distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint, and one finger (0.8%) was middle phalanx. Operative revision was performed on 60 (14.9%) fingers. The need for operative revision was arterial insufficiency in 37 fingers (61.7%) and venous insufficiency in 23 fingers (38.3%). The average revision time was 43 (range=6-144) hours. While the average elapsed time for artery procedures was 35.3 (range=8-110) hours, the average elapsed time for vein procedures was 47.1 (range=6-144) hours. Finger survival rates were examined. Injury mechanism, amputation level, the number of artery/vein repairs and methods were examined in all patients and revision patients separately.Results: After the replantations, according to survival analysis, while 342 (84.9%) fingers were operated upon successfully, 61 (15.1%) fingers developed necrosis. In the patients with revision surgery, the survival rate was 78.3%. The need for revision was arterial insufficiency in 37 fingers (61.7%) and venous insufficiency in 23 fingers (38.3%). The revision rate was significantly lower than other injury types in clean-cut cases. In terms of levels of injury, no revisions were required from distal to lunula level, and the highest revision rate was observed at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint level.Conclusion: The results of the present study have shown that early re-exploration can provide a 78.3% success rate and can increase the survival rate from 67.6% to 84.2% following replantation of single digital amputations. Surgical re-exploration seems to be a reasonable salvage for replanted fingers with vascular insufficiency.

___

1. Cavadas PC, Rubí C, Thione A, Pérez-Espadero A. Immediate versus overnight-delayed digital replantation: Comparative retrospective cohort study of survival outcomes. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43: 625-30. [Crossref]

2. Berlin NL, Tuggle CT, Thomson JG, Au A. Digit replantation in children: A nationwide analysis of outcomes and trends of 455 pediatric patients. Hand (N Y) 2014; 9: 244-52. [Crossref]

3. Breahna A, Siddiqui A, Fitzgerald O'Connor E, Iwuagwu FC. Replantation of digits: A review of predictive factors for survival. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41: 753-7. [Crossref]

4. Tang JB, Giddins G. Why and how to report surgeons’ levels of expertise. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41: 365-6. [Crossref]

5. Shaterian A, Rajaii R, Kanack M, Evans GRD, Leis A. Predictors of digit survival following replantation: Quantitative review and meta-analysis. J Hand Microsurg 2018; 10: 66-73. [Crossref]

6. Cho HE, Zhong L, Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Finger replantation optimization study (FRONT): Update on national trends. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43: 903-912. [Crossref]

7. Özaksar K, Toros T, Sügün TS, Kayalar M, Kaplan I, Ada S. Finger replantations after ring avulsion amputations. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37: 329-35. [Crossref]

8. Mahmoudi E, Chung KC. Effect of hospital volume on success of thumb replantation. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42: 96-103. [Crossref]

9. Waikakul S, Sakkarnkosol S, Vanadurongwan V, Un-nanuntana A. Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients. Injury 2000; 31: 33-40. [Crossref]

10. Chia DSY, Tay SC. A retrospective review of troubled replantations. Hand Surg 2015; 20: 127-32. [Crossref]

11. Watson JT. Couplers in arterial and venous repairs. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38: 1423-6. [Crossref]

12. Veravuthipakorn L, Veravuthipakorn A. Microsurgical free flap and replantation without antithrombotic agents. J Med Assoc Thai 2004; 87: 665-9.

13. Hatchell AC, Sandre AR, McRae M, Farrokhyar F, Avram R. The success of salvage procedures for failing digital replants: A retrospective cohort study. Microsurgery 2018; 39: 200-6. [Crossref]

14. Neinstein RM, Dvali LT, Le S, Anastakis DJ. Complete digital amputations undergoing replantation surgery: A 10-year retrospective study. Hand (N Y) 2012; 7: 263-6. [Crossref]

15. Levin LS, Cooper EO. Clinical use of anticoagulants following replantation surgery. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33: 1437-9. [Crossref]

16. Buckley T, Hammert WC. Anticoagulation following digital replantation. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36: 1374-6. [Crossref]

17. Sanmartin M, Fernandes F, Lajoie AS, Gupta A. Analysis of prognostic factors in ring avulsion injuries. J Hand Surg Am 2004; 29: 1028-37. [Crossref]

18. Zhao J, Abdullah S, Li WJ, Appukuttan A, Tien HY. A novel solution for venous congestion following digital replantation: A proximally based cross-finger flap. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36: 1224-30. [Crossref]

19. Uysal MA, Gulabi D, Mete G, Tunalı S, Avcı A, Bora OA. Arteriography and histopathology of vascular beds in traumatically amputated fingers. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol 2018; 23: 232-7. [Crossref]

20. Efanov JI, Rizis D, Landes G, Bou-Merhi J, Harris PG, Danino MA. Impact of the number of veins repaired in short-term digital replantation survival rate. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69: 640-5. [Crossref]

21. Wang H. Secondary surgery after digit replantation: Its incidence and sequence. Microsurgery 2002; 22: 57-61. [Crossref]

22. Sukop A, Nanka O, Dusková M, et al. Clinical anatomy of the dorsal venous network in fingers with regard to replantation. Clin Anat 2007; 20: 77-81. [Crossref]

23. Hustedt JW, Bohl DD, Champagne L. The detrimental effect of decentralization in digital replantation in the United States: 15 years of evidence from the national inpatient sample. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41: 593-601. [Crossref]

24. Prucz RB, Friedrich JB. Upper extremity replantation: Current concepts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133: 333-42. [Crossref]