Cerrahi olarak tedavi edilen suprakondiler femur kırıklı hastalarda fonksiyonel sonuçların değerlendirilmesi
Amaç: Suprakondiler femur kırığı nedeniyle cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastalarda elde edilen fonksiyonel sonuçlar değerlendirildi. Çalışma planı: Suprakondiler femur kırığı nedeniyle cerrahi tedavi uygulanan 23 hasta (14 erkek, 9 kadın; ort. yaş 34; dağılım 14-64) çalışmaya alındı. Hastalar Neer ve HSS (The Hospital for Special Surgery) diz skorlama sistemlerine göre değerlendirildi. Kuadriseps kas gücünün objektif olarak belirlenmesi için Cybex izokinetik testi uygulandı. Hastalar ortalama 52 ay (dağılım 13-160 ay) süreyle izlendi. Sonuçlar: Hospital for Special Surgery skoru 68-100 arasında (ort. 93.8), Neer derecelendirme skoru 55-100 arasında (ort. 90.1) bulundu. Açısal hızlardaki ekstansör güç kayıpları ortalamaları 60$\circ$/sn'de %27.30, 180$\circ$/sn'de %22.13 bulundu. Skorlama sistemi puanlan ile 60$\circ$/sn ve 180$\circ$/sn açısal hızlardaki ekstansör güç kayıpları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı korelasyon vardı (p0.05). Çıkarımlar: Diz eklemi biyomekaniğinin en önemli unsuru olan kuadriseps kasının gücünün objektif yöntemlerle belirlenmesi, suprakondiler femur kırıklarının fonksiyonel sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesinde önemli bir yer tutmaktadır.
Evaluation of functional results following surgical treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures
Objectives: We evaluated functional results of patients who underwent surgical treatment for supracondylar femoral fractures. Methods: Functional results of surgical treatment for supracondylar femoral fractures were evaluated in 23 patients (14 males, 9 females; mean age 34 years; range 14 to 64 years) with the use of the Neer and HSS (The Hospital for Special Surgery) scoring systems. The strength of the quadriceps muscle was measured using Cybex isokinetic testing. The mean follow-up was 52 months (range 13 to 160 months). Results: The average HSS score was 93.8 (range 68 to 100) and the average Neer score was 90.1 (range 55 to 100). The average losses of extension strength at 60$\circ$/s and 180$\circ$/s were 27.30% and 22.13%, respectively. Statistically significant correlations were found between the losses of extension strength and the Neer and HSS scores (p<0.01). The results showed that the patient's age and sex, the length of time between trauma occurrence and surgery, immobilization period, and the presence of subjective pain complaints had no significant influence on the HSS and Neer scores and on Cybex isokinetic test results (p>0.05). Conclusion: Evaluation of the quadriceps muscle strength with the use of objective tests proved helpful in the determination of functional results of surgery following supracondylar femoral fractures.
___
- 1.Aglietti P, Buzzi R. Fractures of the femoral condyles. In: Insall JN, Windsor RE, Scott WN, Kelly MA, Aglietti P, editors. Surgery of the knee. Vol. 2, 2nd ed. Livingstone: New York; 1993. p. 983-1034.
- 2. Blatter G, König H, Janssen M, Magerl F. Primary femoral shortening osteosynthesis in the management of comminuted supracondylar femoral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1994;113:134-7.
- 3. Chiron HS, Tremoulet J, Casey P, Muller M. Fractures of the distal third of the femur treated by internal fixation. Clin Orthop 1974;(100):160-70.
- 4. Ege R. Femur distal bölge (uç) kırıkları. In: Ege R, editör. Travmatoloji. Kırıklar eklem yaralanmaları. 3. Cilt, 4. baskı. Ankara: Kadıoğlu Matbaası; 1989. s. 2464-509.
- 5. Shahcheraghi GH, Doroodchi HR. Supracondylar fracture of the femur: closed or open reduction? J Trauma 1993;34:499- 502.
- 6. Healy WL, Brooker AF Jr. Distal femoral fractures. Comparison of open and closed methods of treatment. Clin Orthop 1983;(174):166-71.
- 7. Bell KM, Johnstone AJ, Court-Brown CM, Hughes SP. Primary knee arthroplasty for distal femoral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74:400-2.
- 8. Borgen D, Sprague BL. Treatment of distal femoral fractures with early weight-bearing. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop 1975;(111):156-62.
- 9. Connolly JF, Dehne E, Lafollette B. Closed reduction and early cast-brace ambulation in the treatment of femoral fractures. II. Results in one hundred and forty-three fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1973;55:1581-99.
- 10. Neer CS 2nd, Grantham SA, Shelton ML. Supracondylar fracture of the adult femur. A study of one hundred and ten cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1967;49:591-613.
- 11. Böstman OM. Refracture after removal of a condylar plate from the distal third of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990;72:1013-8.
- 12. Ekşioğlu F, Bölükbaşı S, Cila E, Şener E. Diz Çevresi kırıkları: I. Femur suprakondiler kırıkları ve patella kırıkları. Artroplasti Artroskopik Cerrahi 1991;2:12-5.
- 13. Magyar G, Toksvig-Larsen S, Lindstrand A. Open wedge tibial osteotomy by callus distraction in gonarthrosis. Operative technique and early results in 36 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1998;69:147-51.
- 14. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Bertram R, Holmes W, Tscherne H. Transarticular joint reconstruction and indirect plate osteosynthesis for complex distal supracondylar femoral fractures. Injury 1997;28 Suppl 1:A31-41.
- 15.Davies G, Wilk KE, Ellenbecker TS. Assessment of strength. In: Malone TR, Mc Poil T, Nitz AJ, editors. Orthopedic and sports physical therapy. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1997. p. 225-57.
- 16.Whittle AP. Fractures of the lower extremity. In: Canale ST, editor. Campbell's operative orthopaedics. Vol. 3, 9th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1998. p. 2042-179.
- 17.Watson-Jones R. Fractures and joint Injuries. 5th ed. Edinburgh:Livingstone; 1976. p. 65-92.
- 18.Wiss DA, Missakian M. Supracondylar fracture of the femur. Orthopedics 1985;8:921, 924-6.