Are the functional outcomes really inferior following unicondylar knee arthroplasty in patients with partial-thickness cartilage loss?

Are the functional outcomes really inferior following unicondylar knee arthroplasty in patients with partial-thickness cartilage loss?

Objective: The main indication for medial Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) is Full-Thickness Cartilage Loss (FTCL) in the isolated medial compartment of the knee. However, controversial outcomes were reported in patients with Partial-Thickness Cartilage Loss (PTCL). The aim of this study is to compare PTCL and FTCL based on intraoperative findings in medial UKA in terms of functional outcomes and complication rates requiring reoperation and revision. Methods: Two hundred and fifteen knees of 174 patients who underwent mobile-bearing UKA between October 2014 and February 2018 for the diagnosis of symptomatic anteromedial osteoarthritis were evaluated retrospectively. A single senior surgeon evaluated the type of cartilage loss in the medial compartment intraoperatively according to the International Cartilage Repair Society classification system. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score pre- and post-operatively at the last follow-up. Patients with PTCL and FTCL were compared in terms of their pre- and post-operative OKS and IKDC scores, and their improvements, as well as complication rates requiring reoperation and revision. Results: The mean follow-up time was 33.1 ± 5.3 months. The PTCL (n = 80) and FTCL (n = 135) groups were statistically similar in terms of age (P = 0.41), gender (P = 0.921), body mass index (P = 0.165), bilaterality (P = 0.111), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (P = 0.218), Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = 0.74), and post-operative follow-up (P = 0.167). The mean pre-operative OKS and IKDC scores were improved from 24.5 ± 4.1 and 39.9 ± 5 to 40.3 ± 3.6 and 73.9 ± 7.7 at the last follow-up, respectively (P < 0.001). Pre-operative OKS and IKDC scores were superior in favor of the PTCL group. However, no significant difference was found between the groups in terms of post-operative OKS (P = 0.53) and IKDC (P = 0.975) scores, and their improvements (OKS, P = 0.953; IKDC, P = 0.536). The complication rates requiring reoperation was 5% (n = 11) in all patients. Of these, 9% (n = 7) from the PTCL group and 3% (n = 4) from the FTCL group were reoperated. Nevertheless, no significant difference was found between the groups (P = 0.105). Conclusion: In PTCL, medial UKA is a reliable surgery in terms of functional outcomes, the same as in FTCL; however, its complication rates requiring reoperation is higher without statistical significance.

___

  • 1. Mohammad HR, Strickland L, Hamilton TW, Murray DW. Long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knees-a systematic review. Acta Orthop. 2018;89(1):101-107. 10.1080/17453674.2017.1367577
  • 2. Tuncay I, Bilsel K, Elmadag M, Erkocak OF, Asci M, Sen C. Evaluation of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, opening wedge, and dome-type high tibial osteotomies for knee arthritis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(3):280-287.
  • 3. Johal S, Nakano N, Baxter M, Hujazi I, Pandit H, Khanduja V. Unicompart- mental knee arthroplasty: The past, current controversies, and future perspectives. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(10):992-998. 10.1055/s-0038-1625961
  • 4. Murray DW, Parkinson RW. Usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(4):432-435. 10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017- 0716.R1
  • 5. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The routine of surgical manage- ment reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(1):45-49. 10.1302/0301-620X.83B1.0830045
  • 6. Price AJ, Svard U. A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(1):174- 179. 10.1007/s11999-010-1506-2
  • 7. Kozinn SC, Marx C, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A 4.5-6-year follow-up study with a metal-backed tibial component. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4(Suppl):S1-S10. (89)80001-4
  • 8. White SH, Ludkowski PF, Goodfellow JW. Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(4):582-586. 10.1302/0301-620X.73B4.2071640
  • 9. Aldinger PR, Clarius M, Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, Breusch SJ. [Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the “Oxford Uni” meniscal bearing knee]. Der Orthopade. 2004;33(11):1277-1283. 10.1007/s00132-004-0712-6
  • 10. Mukherjee K, Pandit H, Dodd CA, Ostlere S, Murray DW. The Oxford unicom- partmental knee arthroplasty: A radiological perspective. Clin Radiol. 2008;63 (10):1169-1176. 10.1016/j.crad.2007.12.017
  • 11. Waldstein W, Bou Monsef J, Buckup J, Boettner F. The value of valgus stress radiographs in the workup for medial unicompartmental arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(12):3998-4003. 10.1007/s11999-013-3212-3
  • 12. Pandit H, Gulati A, Jenkins C, et al.. Unicompartmental knee replacement for patients with partial thickness cartilage loss in the affected compartment. Knee. 2011;18(3):168-171. 10.1016/j.knee.2010.05.003
  • 13. Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, et al.. Unnecessary contraindications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(5):622-628. 10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.26214
  • 14. Hamilton TW, Pandit HG, Inabathula A, et al.. Unsatisfactory outcomes follow- ing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with partial thickness cartilage loss: A medium-term follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(4):475-482. 10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-1061.R1
  • 15. Berend KR, Lombardi AVJr., Jacobs CA. The combination of preoperative bone marrow lesions and partial-thickness cartilage loss did not result in inferior outcomes after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(10):3000-3003. 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.008
  • 16. Carlson SW, Vargas-Hernandez JS, Carlson BC, Sierra RJ. Lack of bone-on-bone arthritis is not a strict contraindication for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. JB JS Open Access. 2020;5(3):e19.00058. 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00058
  • 17. Maier MW, Kuhs F, Streit MR, et al.. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with full versus partial thickness cartilage loss (PTCL): Equal in clinical outcome but with higher reoperation rate for patients with PTCL. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(8):1169-1175. 10.1007/s00402-015-2236-4
  • 18. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1987;40(5):373-383. 10.1016/0021-9681(87) 90171-8
  • 19. Brittberg M, Winalski CS. Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(Suppl 2):58-69. 10.2106/00004623-200300002-00008
  • 20. Maheshwari AV, Blum YC, Shekhar L, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Multimodal pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty at the Ranawat Ortho- paedic Center. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(6):1418-1423. 10.1007/s11999- 009-0728-7
  • 21. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(1):63-69. 10.1302/0301-620X.80B1.0800063
  • 22. Tugay BU, Tugay N, Guney H, Kinikli GI, Yuksel I, Atilla B. Oxford Knee Score: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(2):198-206.
  • 23. Çelik D, Coşkunsu D, Ö K, Ergönül Ö, Irrgang JJ. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form into Turkish. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(11):899-909. 10.2519/ jospt.2014.4865
  • 24. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al.. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(5):600-613. 10.1177/03635465010290051301
  • 25. Knifsund J, Hatakka J, Keemu H, Makela K, Koivisto M, Niinimaki T. unicom- partmental knee arthroplasties are performed on the patients with radiologi- cally too mild Osteoarthritis. Scand J Surg. 2017;106(4):338-341. 10.1177/ 1457496917701668
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica-Cover
  • ISSN: 1017-995X
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Can the cortical bone trajectory screw technique be an alternative method to the pedicle screw in posterior lumbar fusion? A systematic review and meta- analysis

Kun-Tae Kim, Myung-Geun Song, Eun-Chang Lee, Min-Seok Seo, Dong-Yeong Lee, Dong- Hee Kim

Mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic repair of isolated and combined subscapularis tears: A single-center experience

Recep Kurnaz, Selim Ergün, Murat Aşçı, Umut Akgün, Taner Güneş

Are the functional outcomes really inferior following unicondylar knee arthroplasty in patients with partial-thickness cartilage loss?

Nurzat Elmalı, Anıl Pulatkan, Fatih Yıldız, Vahdet Uçan, İbrahim Tuncay

Alkaptonuria with rapidly destructive arthropathy of the hip: A case report and literature review

Nobuhiro Kaku, Hiroaki Tagomori, Hiroshi Tsumura, Yoshiki Kitahara

Classification of vascularized fibular flap hypertrophy based on X-ray evaluation

Tulgar Toros, Murat Kayalar, Kemal Özaksar, Tahir Sadık Sügün, Yusuf Gürbüz

Analysis of risk factors affecting mortality in elderly patients operated on for hip fractures: A retrospective comparative study

Çağdaş Biçen, Mehmet Akdemir, Mehmet Aykut Türken, Kübra Çekok, Ahmet Ekin, Ahmet Cemil Turan

The impact of severity of patellofemoral osteoarthritis on the patient-reported outcomes of total knee arthroplasty with patellar retention: A retrospective comparative study

Xunkai Feng, Chongyi Fan, Fei Wang

Clinical effects of suprascapular nerve block in addition to intra-articular corticosteroid injection in the early stages of adhesive capsulitis: A single- blind, randomized controlled trial

Kardelen Gencer-Atalay, Sefa Kurt, Ebru Kaplan, İlker Yağcı

Evaluation of the relationship between stiffness and thickness of the sciatic nerve and clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: A prospective case- controlled study

Emre Toğrul, Osman Ciloğlu, Evren Karaali, Feride Fatma Görgülü

Autologous osteochondral transplantation provides succesful recovery in patients with simultaneous medial and lateral talus osteochondral lesions

Çağrı Örs, Yaman Sarpel