The Accuracy of Provocative Tests on Diabetic Patients with Suspected Carpal Tunnel Syndome and Comparison with Nondiabetics

Objective: Carpal tunnel syndrome in diabetic patients differ in some aspects from those in the nondiabetic population. The study was designed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of widely used provocative tests in the diabetic population in comparison to nondiabetic population. Materials and Methods: 87 nondiabetic and 25 diabetic hands suspicious of carpal tunnel syndrome were included in this retrospective study. The presence of carpal tunnel syndrome is confirmed by nerve conduction studies. The hands were divided into DM- and DM+ groups based on patients’ diabetes mellitus history. From patient records, results of Tinel’s, Phalen’s, Durkan’s, median nerve compression, and scratch collapse tests were obtained. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of tests are calculated for each population and then compared with each other. Results: Tinel’s test had a higher sensitivity in the diabetic population. Accuracies of Phalen’s, Durkan’s, median nerve compression, and scratch collapse tests in diabetic patients were similar to those in diabetic patients. None of the tests had a high enough sensitivity to be used alone in either group. Scratch collapse test had very high specificity in both groups but very low sensitivity. Conclusion: The studied provocative tests have comparable accuracy for carpal tunnel syndrome in diabetic patients to those in nondiabetic patients, with Tinel even having higher sensitivity. But excluding scratch collapse test, none of the tests is strong enough to achieve a diagnosis and none is sensitive enough to rule out a disease.

PDF

___

[1] Atroshi I, C Gummesson, R Johnsson, et al. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. Jama 1999; 282: 153-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.2.153
[2] Perkins BA, D Olaleye, and V Bril. Carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 565-9. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.3.565
[3] Kasundra GM, I Sood, AN Bhargava, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: Analyzing efficacy and utility of clinical tests and various diagnostic modalities. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2015; 6: 504-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976- 3147.169867
[4] Williams TM, SE Mackinnon, CB Novak, et al. Verification of the pressure provocative test in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 1992; 29: 8-11. https://doi. org/10.1097/00000637-199207000-00003
[5] Durkan JA. A new diagnostic test for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 535-8. https:// doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199173040-00009
[6] Tetro AM, BA Evanoff, SB Hollstien, et al. A new provocative test for carpal tunnel syndrome. Assessment of wrist flexion and nerve compression. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 493- 8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.80B3.0800493
[7] Cheng CJ, B Mackinnon-Patterson, JL Beck, et al. Scratch collapse test for evaluation of carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33: 1518-24. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.05.022
[8] LeBlanc KE and W Cestia. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Am Fam Physician 2011; 83: 952-8.
[9] Sonoo M, DL Menkes, JDP Bland, et al. Nerve conduction studies and EMG in carpal tunnel syndrome: Do they add value? Clin Neurophysiol Pract 2018; 3: 78-88. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.02.005
[10] Zyluk A and P Puchalski. A comparison of outcomes of carpal tunnel release in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2013; 38: 485-8. https://doi. org/10.1177/1753193412469781
[11] Tekin F, M Sürmeli, H Şimşek, et al. Comparison of the histopathological findings of patients with diabetic and idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Int Orthop 2015; 39: 2395-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2790-y
[12] Tsai NW, LH Lee, CR Huang, et al. The diagnostic value of ultrasonography in carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. BMC Neurol 2013; 13: 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-13-65
[13] Ozer K, S Malay, S Toker, et al. Minimal clinically important difference of carpal tunnel release in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131: 1279- 85. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828bd6ec
[14] Tinel J. “Tingling” signs with peripheral nerve injuries. 1915. J Hand Surg Br 2005; 30: 87-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. JHSB.2004.10.007
[15] Phalen GS. The carpal-tunnel syndrome. Seventeen years’ experience in diagnosis and treatment of six hundred fifty-four hands. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1966; 48: 211-28. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-196648020-00001
[16] Fertl E, C Wöber, and J Zeitlhofer. The serial use of two provocative tests in the clinical diagnosis of carpal tunel syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand 1998; 98: 328-32. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1998.tb01743.x
[17] Kaul MP, KJ Pagel, MJ Wheatley, et al. Carpal compression test and pressure provocative test in veterans with median-distribution paresthesias. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 107-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097- 4598(200101)24:1<107::AID-MUS14>3.0.CO;2-8
[18] Mondelli M, S Passero, and F Giannini. Provocative tests in different stages of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2001; 103: 178-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0303-8467(01)00140-8
[19] Walters C and V Rice. An evaluation of provocative testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Mil Med 2002; 167: 647-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/167.8.647
[20] El Miedany Y, S Ashour, S Youssef, et al. Clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: old tests-new concepts. Joint Bone Spine 2008; 75: 451-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbspin.2007.09.014
[21] Makanji HS, SJ Becker, CS Mudgal, et al. Evaluation of the scratch collapse test for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2014; 39: 181-6. https://doi. org/10.1177/1753193413497191
[22] Simon J, K Lutsky, M Maltenfort, et al. The Accuracy of the Scratch Collapse Test Performed by Blinded Examiners on Patients With Suspected Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Assessed by Electrodiagnostic Studies. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42: 386.e1-86.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.031
[23] Zhang D, CM Chruscielski, P Blazar, et al. Accuracy of Provocative Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online 2020; 2: 121-25. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.03.002
[24] Gupta R, K Rowshan, T Chao, et al. Chronic nerve compression induces local demyelination and remyelination in a rat model of carpal tunnel syndrome. Exp Neurol 2004; 187: 500-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. expneurol.2004.02.009
[25] Küçükakkaş O and OV Yurdakul. The diagnostic value of clinical examinations when diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome assisted by nerve conduction studies. J Clin Neurosci 2019; 61: 136-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jocn.2018.10.106
[26] Gerr F and R Letz. The sensitivity and specificity of tests for carpal tunnel syndrome vary with the comparison subjects. J Hand Surg Br 1998; 23: 151-5. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0266-7681(98)80163-0
[27] Descatha A, AM Dale, A Franzblau, et al. Diagnostic strategies using physical examination are minimally useful in defining carpal tunnel syndrome in population-based research studies. Occup Environ Med 2010; 67: 133-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2009.047431