Percutaneous Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenoses with Stents: A Single Center Experience

Objectives: The effectiveness of carotid artery stenting for primary and sec-ondary prevention of ischemic stroke has been demonstrated in many stud-ies. In this study, we aimed to present the characteristics and post-procedur-al clinical outcomes of the patients admitted to our clinic with severe carotid artery disease and revascularized by carotid artery stenting with distal em-bolic protection system.Materials and Methods: This study was a single center retrospective study. Between Jan 2015 and May 2017 patients undergoing carotid artery stenting procedure were included in the study. Symptomatic cases with more than 50% stenosis and asymptomatic patients with more than 70% carotid steno-sis were included. Results: Twenty-five patients were included in the study. 68% of patients were male with a mean age of 69.3 ± 15.7 years. 92% of patients were symptomatic. In all patients, distal embolic protection devices and self-expandable carotid stents were used. All procedures were performed successfully. No mortality or myocardial infarction was observed in any of the patients in whom carot-id artery stenting was applied successfully. Five complications were seen re-lated to the procedure. One patient had air embolism, one patient had tran-sient ischemic attack, one patient had stroke, one patient had symptomatic nodal rhythm and the last patient had hyper-perfusion syndrome.Conclusion: Carotid artery stenting is being successfully applied with ac-ceptable complication rates in experienced centers.

Kaynakça

Polat N, Elbey MA, Akıl E, et al. Karotis artere stent yer-leştirme: Tek merkez deneyimi ve Klinik sonuçları. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2014; 41 (4): 685-89.

Hıdıroğlu M, Çetin L, Kunt A, et al. Karotis arter hastalıkların-da karotis endarterektomi erken sonuçları. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 18(3): 190-95.

Ertem A, Akdemir R, Kılıç H, et al. Karotis Artere Stent Yerleştirmenin Orta Dönem Klinik Sonuçları: Tek Merkez Çalışması. Sakarya Med J 2013; 3(2): 65-71.

Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, et al. ASA/ACCF/ AHA/ AANN/ AANS/ACR/ASNR/ CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/ SVS guideline on the management of patients with extra-cranial carotid and vertebral artery disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Neuro-Interventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 2011; 24(4): 489-532.

Tendera M, Aboyans V, Bartelink ML, et al. ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterydis-eases: Document covering atherosclerotic disease of ex-tracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, up-per and lower extremity arteries: the Task Force on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Artery Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011; 32(22): 2851-906.

Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, et al. ASA/ACCF/AHA/ AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/ SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/ SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients with Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease. Circulation 124: e54-e130.

Eckard DA, Zarnow DM, McPherson CM, et al. Intracranial internal carotid artery angioplasty: technique with clini-cal and radiographic result and follow-up. AJR 1999; 172: 7 0 3 - 0 7.

Theron JG, Payelle GG, Coskun O, et al. Carotid artery ste-nosis: treatment with protected balloon angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology 1996; 201(3): 627-36.

Henry M, Amor M. 9th International course book on Peripheral Vascular Intervention. 1988, Europe Bd: 607-20.

Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics 2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 127(1): e6-e245.

Phatouros CC, Higashida RT, Malek AM, et al. Carotid ar-tery stent placement for atherosclerotic disease: rationale, technique, and current status. Radiology 2000; 217(1): 26-41.

Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Haynes RB, et al. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325(7): 445-53.

Farrell,B, A Fraser, P Sandercock, J, et al. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid ste-nosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998; 351(9113): 1379-87.

Kim LK, Yang DC, Swaminathan RV, et al. Comparison of Trends and Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting and Endarterectomy in the United States, 2001 to 2010. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7(5): 692-700.

Kerber CW, Cromwell LD, Loehden OL. Catheter dilatation of proximal carotid stenosis during distal bifurcation end-arterectomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1980; 1(4): 348-49.

Naylor AR, Bolia A, Abbott RJ, et al. Randomized study of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarter-ectomy: a stopped trial. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28(2): 326-34.

Jordan WD Jr, Schroeder PT, Fisher WS, et al. A compari-son of angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy for the treatment Of carotid artery stenosis. Ann Vasc Surg 1997; 11(1): 2-8.

Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Brückmann H, et al. 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty ver-sus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2006; 368(9543): 12 3 9 - 47.

Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, et al. Stenting vs endar-terectomy For treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 11-23.

Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, et al. Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk pa-tients. N Engl J Med 2008; 358(15): 1572-79.

Gray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S, et al. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44(2): 258-68.

Ansel GM, Hopkins LN, Jaff MR, et al. Safety and effective-ness of the INVATEC MO.MA proximal cerebral protec-tion device during carotid artery stenting: results from the ARMOUR pivotal trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76(1): 1-8.

Wholey MH, Wholey M, Bergeron P, et al. Current global status of carotid artery stent placement. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998; 44(1): 1-6.

Shawl F, Kadro W, Domanski MJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of elective carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35(7): 1721-28.

Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, et al. Endarterectomy ver-sus Stenting in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis. N Engl J Med 2006; 355(16): 1660-71.

Eckstein HH, Ringleb P, Allenberg JR, et al. Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic ste-noses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(10): 893-02.

Qureshi AI, Luft AR, Sharma M, et al. Prevention and treat-ment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications as-sociated with endovascular procedures: Part II-Clinical as-pects and recommendations. Neurosurgery 2000; 46(6): 1360-75; discussion 1375-6.

Theron J, Raymond J, Casasco A, et al. Percutaneous Angioplasty of Atherosclerotic and Postsurgical Stenosis of Carotid Arteries. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1987; 8(3): 495-500.

Zahn R, Mark B, Niedermaier N, et al. Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: better results than stenting without protection? Eur Heart J 2004; 25(17): 1550 -58 .

Wholey MH, Jarmolowski CR, Eles G, et al. Endovascular stents for carotid artery occlusive disease. J Endovasc Surg 1997; 4(4): 326-38.

Kaynak Göster