45 Yaş ve Üzeri Bireylerin Diyabet Riski İle Sağlık Okuryazarlık Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi: Tanımlayıcı, İlişki Arayıcı Bir Çalışma

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, riskli grupta yer alan ≥45 yaş bireylerin gerçek ve algıladıkları diyabetes mellitus riskleri ile sağlık okuryazarlık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı, ilişki arayıcı tipteki çalışmaya, ≥45 yaşında, üniversite personeli olan 82 kişi dahil edilmiştir. Veriler, Finlandiya Tip-2 Diyabet Risk Anketi (FINDRISK), “diyabet riskinizi yorumlayınız” şeklindeki soru ve Türkiye Sağlık Okuryazarlığı Ölçeği (TSOY-32) ile toplanmıştır. Bulgular: Bireylerin yaklaşık %26’sının gerçek diyabetes mellitus riski yüksek-çok yüksek düzeydedir. Katılımcıların gerçek ve algıladıkları diyabetes mellitus riski arasında pozitif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki varlığı saptanmıştır (r=0.771, p

Determining Diabetes Risk and Health Literacy Levels in Individuals Aged 45 and Above: A Descriptive Correlational Study

Purpose:The aim of this study is to determine actual and perceived diabetes risk in individuals aged ≥45 and their health literacy levels. Methods and Materials: The study is of descriptive, correlational design and was conducted with 82 university staff members of ages ≥45 years. Along with Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC), was used to collect data of the question, “Please comment on your diabetes risk?”and the Health Literacy Scale for Turkey (HLST-32). Results: About of twenty-six percent for the participants exhibited a high/very high actual diabetes mellitus risk. A positive and significant correlation was found between the participants’ actual and perceived risk of diabetes mellitus (r=0.771, p

PDF

___

1. Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Health, Turkey Public Health Institution. Turkish Diabetes Programme, 2015-2020. Ankara: Kuban Publication.
2. Tabák AG, Herder C, Rathmann W, et al. Prediabetes: A high-risk state for diabetes development. Lancet. 2012;379(9833):2279-90. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60283-9
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. Atlanta, GA: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2020.
4. World Health Organization (WHO-2021). Diabetes Key Facts. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ diabetes
5. International Diabetes Federation (IDF-2019). Diabetes Atlas 9th Edition. ISBN: 978-2-930229-87-4
6. Satman İ, Imamoglu Ş, Candeger Y, et al. Diagnosis, classification and screening in glycemic disorders. 10th ed. Ankara: Miki Publication; 2015.
7. Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;128:40-50. DOI:10.1016/j. diabres.2017.03.024
8. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Suppl 1):S14-S31. DOI:10.2337/dc20-S002
9. Turkish Endocrinology and Metabolism Association. Guidelines for Diagnosis, Management and Follow-up of Diabetes Mellitus Complication. Ankara: Bayt Publication; 2020.
10. Sand-Jecklin K, Murray B, Summers B, et al. Educating nursing students about health literacy: From the classroom to the patient bedside. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. 2010;15(3). DOI:10.3912/OJIN.Vol15No03PPT02
11. Aslantekin F, Yumrutas M. Health literacy and measurment. TAF Prev Med Bull. 2014;13(4):327-34. DOI:10.5455/pmb.1-1364566995
12. Ilgaz A, Gozum S. Importance of health literacy for safe use of complementary health approaches. E-Journal of Dokuz Eylul University Nursing Faculty. 2016;9(2):67-77.
13. Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, et al. Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and andmodels.BMCPublic Health. 2012;12:80. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-80
14. Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Health, Health Improvement General Directorate. Health Literacy Levels in Turkey and Related Factors Survey. Ankara: Ozyurt Publication; 2019.
15. Choi SE, Rush E, Henry S. Health literacy in Korean immigrants at risk for type 2 diabetes. J Immigr Minor Health. 2013;15(3):553-9. DOI:10.1007/s10903-012-9672-9
16. Kolb JM, Kitos NR, Ramachandran A, et al. What do primary care prediabetes patients need? A baseline assessment of patients engaging in a technology-enhanced lifestyle intervention. J Bioinform Diabetes. 2014;1(1):4.
17. Kim SH, Yu X. The mediating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between health literacy and health status in Korean older adults: a short report. Aging Ment Health. 2010;14(7):870-3. DOI:10.1080/13607861003801011
18. Lindström J, Tuomilehto J. The diabetes risk score: A practical tool to predict type 2 diabetes risk. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):725-31. DOI:10.2337/diacare.26.3.725
19. Etbas Demirag H. Diabetes Risk Assessment of the First Degree Relatives of Patients with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus [Master’s thesis]. Aydın, Turkey: University of Adnan Menderes, Institute of Health Sciences; 2016.
20. HLS-EU Consortium. Comparative report of health literacy in eight EU member states. The European Health Literacy Survey HLS-EU; 2012.
21. Okyay P, Abacigil F. Turkish health literacy scales, reliability and validity survey. 1st ed. Ankara: Ministry of Health Publication; 2016.
22. Capik C. Statistical power analysis and it’s use in nursing studies: Basic information. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences. 2014;17(4):268-74.
23. Ivanov LL, Wallace DC, Hernández C, et al. Diabetes risks and health literacy in southern African American and Latino women. J Community Health Nurs. 2015;32(1):12-23. DOI:10.1080/07370016.2 015.991664
24. Guo J, Tang Y, Zhang H, et al. The risk, perceived and actual, of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus for mothers of preschool children in urban China. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0222839. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0222839
25. Graham GN, Leath B, Payne K, et al. Perceived versus actual risk for hypertensionanddiabetesintheAfricanAmericancommunity. Health Promot Pract. 2006;7(1):34-46. DOI:10.1177/1524839905283891
26. Durusu-Tanrıover M, Yildirim HH, Demiray-Ready FN, et al. Turkish Health Literacy Survey. 1st ed. Ankara: Saglık-Sen Press; 2014.
27. Akyol Guner T, Kuzu A, Bayraktaroglu T. The relationship between health literacy and rational drug use in individuals with diabetes. Turk J Diab Obes. 2020;4(3):214-23. DOI: 10.25048/tudod.775075
28. Souza JG, Apolinario D, Magaldi RM, et al. Functional health literacy and glycaemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(2):e004180. DOI:10.1136/ bmjopen-2013-004180
29. Hussein SH, Almajran A, Albatineh AN. Prevalence of health literacy and its correlates among patients with type II diabetes in Kuwait: A population based study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;141:118-25. DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2018.04.033
30. Ilhan N, Telli S, Temel B, et al. Health literacy and diabetes self-care in individuals with type 2 diabetes in Turkey. Prim Care Diabetes. 2021;15(1):74-9. DOI:10.1016/j.pcd.2020.06.009
31. Fitria E, Sylvia EI, Datak G. Health literacy and diabetes risk factors score. 2019; Thailand: In Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Health. 4:641-6.
32. Schillinger D, Grumbach K, Piette J, et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA. 2002;288(4):475-82. DOI:10.1001/ jama.288.4.475