This study was carried out to determine the derivative energy (biogas) from different food waste substrates. A fixed mass (5kg) of different food substrates and distilled water (5kg) were anaerobically digested in the ratio of 1:1, and their derivable energy were measured respectively for raw and purified biogas. Food substrates used for the process includes Beans, Rice, Yam, Fufu, Ripe Plantain, Garri, Corn, Unripe Plantain, Sweet Potatoes, Ripe Banana, Pineapple and Water Melon, but Garri yielded the highest raw biogas of 140g and highest purified biogas of 110g. This was followed by Fufu and Yam which yielded raw biogas of 120g and purified biogas of 90g. Among the aforementioned substrates digested, Sweet potatoes had the lowest raw biogas yield of 70g with the lowest purified biogas yield of 50g. It was observed that pH of feedstocks before digestion varied between 6.8 and 7.2, whereas, pH of the same feedstocks after digestion varied between 7.4 and 7.7, indicating that the by-product can be useful as a valuable product for compost manure after biogas recovery. Hence, this study has shown that biogas can be produced from different food waste, but some food waste has a higher biogas energy potential than other food waste. "> [PDF] Investigation of Biogas Energy Derivation from Anaerobic Digestion of Different Local Food Wastes in Nigeria | [PDF] Investigation of Biogas Energy Derivation from Anaerobic Digestion of Different Local Food Wastes in Nigeria This study was carried out to determine the derivative energy (biogas) from different food waste substrates. A fixed mass (5kg) of different food substrates and distilled water (5kg) were anaerobically digested in the ratio of 1:1, and their derivable energy were measured respectively for raw and purified biogas. Food substrates used for the process includes Beans, Rice, Yam, Fufu, Ripe Plantain, Garri, Corn, Unripe Plantain, Sweet Potatoes, Ripe Banana, Pineapple and Water Melon, but Garri yielded the highest raw biogas of 140g and highest purified biogas of 110g. This was followed by Fufu and Yam which yielded raw biogas of 120g and purified biogas of 90g. Among the aforementioned substrates digested, Sweet potatoes had the lowest raw biogas yield of 70g with the lowest purified biogas yield of 50g. It was observed that pH of feedstocks before digestion varied between 6.8 and 7.2, whereas, pH of the same feedstocks after digestion varied between 7.4 and 7.7, indicating that the by-product can be useful as a valuable product for compost manure after biogas recovery. Hence, this study has shown that biogas can be produced from different food waste, but some food waste has a higher biogas energy potential than other food waste. ">

Investigation of Biogas Energy Derivation from Anaerobic Digestion of Different Local Food Wastes in Nigeria

Investigation of Biogas Energy Derivation from Anaerobic Digestion of Different Local Food Wastes in Nigeria

This study was carried out to determine the derivative energy (biogas) from different food waste substrates. A fixed mass (5kg) of different food substrates and distilled water (5kg) were anaerobically digested in the ratio of 1:1, and their derivable energy were measured respectively for raw and purified biogas. Food substrates used for the process includes Beans, Rice, Yam, Fufu, Ripe Plantain, Garri, Corn, Unripe Plantain, Sweet Potatoes, Ripe Banana, Pineapple and Water Melon, but Garri yielded the highest raw biogas of 140g and highest purified biogas of 110g. This was followed by Fufu and Yam which yielded raw biogas of 120g and purified biogas of 90g. Among the aforementioned substrates digested, Sweet potatoes had the lowest raw biogas yield of 70g with the lowest purified biogas yield of 50g. It was observed that pH of feedstocks before digestion varied between 6.8 and 7.2, whereas, pH of the same feedstocks after digestion varied between 7.4 and 7.7, indicating that the by-product can be useful as a valuable product for compost manure after biogas recovery. Hence, this study has shown that biogas can be produced from different food waste, but some food waste has a higher biogas energy potential than other food waste.

___

  • [1] A. Ikpe, and I. Owunna, “Review of Municipal Solid Waste Management Technologies and Its Practices In China And Germany” International Journal of Technology Enhancements and Emerging Engineering Research Vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1-7, 2016.
  • [2] EC Ifeanyi, “Potential Impact of Climate Change on Solid Waste Management in Nigeria”, [online] available from [29 March 2017].
  • [3] O. Aluko, M. Sridhar and P. Oluwande, “Characterization of leachates from a municipal solid waste landfill site in Ibadan, Nigeria,” Chartered Institute of Environmental Health 2(1), 2003.
  • [4] World Population Review, “Nigeria Population 2014”, [online] available from [26 December 2017].
  • [5] I. Adewumi, M. Ogedengbe, J. Adepetu, and Y. Fabiyi, “Planning Organic Fertilizer Industries for Municipal Solid Waste Management”, Journal of Applied Sciences Research Vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 285-291, 2005.
  • [6] C. Ogwueleka, “Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Nigeria”, Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 173-180, 2009.
  • [7] M. Dauda and OO Osita, Solid waste management and re-use in Maiduguri, Nigeria. 29th WEDC International Conference: Towards the Millennium Development Goals, 2003.
  • [8] PO Ebunilo, J Okovido and AE Ikpe, “Anaerobic Digestion of Food Substrates for Biogas Production”, Nigerian Research Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 236-245, 2018.
  • [9] AB Onakoya, AO Onakoya, OA Jimi-Salami and B Odedairo, “Energy Consumption and Nigerian Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis”, European Scientific Journal, Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1857-7881, 2013.
  • [10] A. Ogundipe and A Apata, “Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth in Nigeria”, Journal of Business Management and Applied Economics Vol. 2, no. 4, 2013.
  • [11] AE Akinlo, “Electricity Consumption and Economic growth in Nigeria: Evidence from Cointegration and Co-feature Analysis”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 681-693, 2009.
  • [12] World Bank, “Country Partnership Strategy for the Federal Republic of Nigeria (2005-2009)”, Report No. 32412 –NG, 2005.
  • [13] C Ukpabi, O Ndukwe, O Okoro, I John and P Eti, “The Production of Biogas Using Cow Dung and Food Waste”, International Journal of Materials and Chemistry, Vol. 7, no. (2), pp. 21-24, 2017.
  • [14] RB Nallamothu, A Teferra and BV Apparao, “Biogas Purification, Compression and Bottling. Global Journal of Engineering”, Design and Technology Vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 34-38, 2013.
  • [15] K. Faisal, HB Abdullah, NH Muhammad, AC Habibullah, “Production of Biogas by Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste and Process Simulation”, American Journal of Mechanical Engineering Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 7983, 2015.
  • [16] Soil Survey Division Staff, "Soil survey manual: 1993. Chapter 3, selected chemical properties", Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18, 1993.
  • [17] J Mata-Alvarez, S Mace and P Llabres “Anaerobic Digestion of organic solid Wastes An overview of Research Achievements and Perspectives”, Bioresource Technology Vol. 74, pp. 3-16, 2000.
  • [18] M Murto, L. Bjornsson, and B Mattiasson, “Impact of Food Industrial Waste on Anaerobic Co-digestion of Sewage Sludge and Pig Manure”, Journal of Environment Management, Vol. 70, pp. 101-107, 2004.
  • [19] O Stabnikova, XY Liu, and JY Wang, “Digestion of Frozen/thawed Food Waste in the Hybrid Anaerobic Solidliquid System”, Waste Manage Vol. 28, pp. 1654-1659, 2008.
  • [20] B. Zhang, LL Zhang, SC Zhang, HZ Shi and WM Cai, “The influence of pH on hydrolysis and acidogenesis of kitchen wastes in two-phase anaerobic digestion”, Environmental Technology, Vol. 26, pp. 329-339, 2005.
  • [21] EK Orhorhoro, PO Ebunilo, AE Ikpe, “Effect of pH on Anaerobic Digestion (AD) of organic Municipal Solid Waste in Benin City, Nigeria”, Journal of the Nigerian Association of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 36, pp. 369-374, 2016.
  • [22] PO Ebunilo, J. Okovido, AE Ikpe, “Investigation of the energy (biogas) production from co-digestion of organic waste materials”, International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 68-75, 2018.
  • [23] AE Ikpe, PO Ebunilo, EG Sadjere, “Effects of waste dumpsites on geotechnical properties of the underlying soils in wet season”, Environmental Engineering Research, Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 289-297, 2019.
  • [24] EPA Environmental Protection Agency, “Landfill Recovery and Use in Nigeria (Pre- Feasibility Studies of Using LFGE), Grant No: XA83367801, Centre for People and Environment (CPE), Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria, 2011.
  • [25] AE Ikpe, PO Ebunilo, J. Okovido, “Geotechnical Evaluation of Bentonite Clay for Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Lining Membrane”, Applied Journal of Environmental Engineering Science, Vol. 4, no. 3, pp 337- 351, 2018.
  • [26] RISEAT Regional Information Service Centre for South East Asia on Appropriate Technology, “Review of current status of Anaerobic Digestion Technology for treatment of MSW”, 1998.
  • [27] T. Meisam, RA Raha, G André-Denis, YS Wright, A Norhani, S Alawi, S Kenji and AH Mohd “Importance of the methanogenic archaea populations in anaerobic wastewater treatments”, Process Biochemistry, Vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1214-1225, 2010.
  • [28] AH Igoni, MFN Abowei, MJ Ayotamuno, and CL Eze, “Comparative Evaluation of Batch and Continuous Anaerobic Digesters in Biogas Production from Municipal Solid Waste using Mathematical Models”, Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal. ISSN 1682-1130, 2009.
  • [29] R. Ramaraj, Y. Unpaprom, “Effect of Temperature on the Performance of Biogas Production from Duckweed” Chemistry Research Journal, Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 58-66, 2016.
ACADEMIC PLATFORM-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-4575
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Akademik Perspektif Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Alüminyum-Magnezyum-Zirkonyum Alaşımına Grafen-Nano Karbon Esaslı Takviyelerin, Fiziksel ve Mekanik Özelliklere Etkisinin İncelenmesi

Levent Cenk Kumruoğlu

Sürekli Optimizasyon Problemleri için Çoklu Arama Stratejisi Kullanan Fil Sürü Optimizasyonu

Hüseyin Haklı

Fren Balatası Üretimi için Zirkonya Esaslı Yeni Kompozisyonların Geliştirilmesi

Arife Yurdakul, Nurdan Baştürk

Yüksek Sıcaklıkta Uzun Bir Süre Çekirdekleştirilen Kolloidal CdSe Kuantum Noktalarının Sentezi ve Optik Karakterizasyonu

Çağdaş Allahverdi

A Study on Performance Improvement of Heart Disease Prediction by Attribute Selection Methods

Ümit Atila, Kemal Akyol

Human Papilloma Virüs (HPV) Varlığının Cinsel Aktif Kadınlarda Moleküler Metodlarla Değerlendirilmesi

Meltem Öznur, Abdullah Gümüş, Remzi Abalı, Behiç Selman Erdoğdu, Mustafa Yöntem, Fatih Erci

Sismik Tekstil ile Güçlendirilmiş Düşey Delikli Yığma Tuğla ve Bims Blokların Üç Noktalı Kesme Deneyi

Berna İstegün, Ayşenur Subaşı, Erkan Çelebi

Soya Yağı ile Kömür Yıkama Tesis Atıklarından Temiz Yakıt Üretimi

Abdul Vahap Korkmaz, Hasan Hacıfazlıoğlu, Yakup Eker

Yüzey Karakteristiklerinin NiTi Şekil Hafızalı Alaşımlarının in vitro Biyouyumluluk Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkileri

Sıdıka Mine Toker, Gabriella Sugerman, Elliot Christian Frey

Anormal Trafik Tespiti için Veri Madenciliği Algoritmalarının Performans Analizi

Sezgin Kaçar, Ünal Çavuşoğlu