Çürüksüz diş yüzey kayıpları olarak tanımlanan atrizyon, abrazyon, erozyon ve abfraksiyon lezyonları etiyolojileri farklı olsa da temelde diş yapılarında değişiklikle kendilerini gösterir ve ‘‘diş aşınmaları’’ olarak nitelendirilir. Diş aşınmaları klinisyenler için ciddi bir problem oluşturmaktadır. Ancak özellikle terminolojideki farklılıklar ve diş sert doku kaybının teşhisinde, sınıflandırılmasında ve takibinde kullanılabilecek çok sayıda indeksin varlığı nedeniyle literatürdeki klinik ve epidemiyolojik çalışmaların yorumlanması oldukça zordur. Bu derlemenin amacı, diş aşınmalarını etiyolojilerine göre sınıflandırarak, günümüze kadar kullanılan değerlendirme indekslerinin evrimini analiz etmek ve bu indekslerin diş hekimliğindeki klinik ihtiyaçları karşılayıp karşılamadıklarını değerlendirmektir.
Despite the different etiologies of attrition, abrasion, erosion and abfraction lesions, which are defined as caries-free tooth surface losses, they are mainly manifested by changes in tooth structures and are considered to be ‘‘tooth wear’’. Tooth wear is a serious problem for clinicians. However, clinical and epidemiological studies in the literature are very difficult to interpret, especially due to differences in terminology and the presence of a large number of indices that can be used in the diagnosis, classification and follow-up of tooth hard tissue loss. The purpose of this review is to classify the tooth wear according to their etiology, to analyze the evolution of the evaluation indices used to date, and to evaluate whether they meet clinical needs in dentistry. "> [PDF] Diş aşınmalarının sınıflandırılması ve teşhiste kullanılan indeksler | [PDF] Classification of tooth wear and indexes used in diagnosis Çürüksüz diş yüzey kayıpları olarak tanımlanan atrizyon, abrazyon, erozyon ve abfraksiyon lezyonları etiyolojileri farklı olsa da temelde diş yapılarında değişiklikle kendilerini gösterir ve ‘‘diş aşınmaları’’ olarak nitelendirilir. Diş aşınmaları klinisyenler için ciddi bir problem oluşturmaktadır. Ancak özellikle terminolojideki farklılıklar ve diş sert doku kaybının teşhisinde, sınıflandırılmasında ve takibinde kullanılabilecek çok sayıda indeksin varlığı nedeniyle literatürdeki klinik ve epidemiyolojik çalışmaların yorumlanması oldukça zordur. Bu derlemenin amacı, diş aşınmalarını etiyolojilerine göre sınıflandırarak, günümüze kadar kullanılan değerlendirme indekslerinin evrimini analiz etmek ve bu indekslerin diş hekimliğindeki klinik ihtiyaçları karşılayıp karşılamadıklarını değerlendirmektir. "> Çürüksüz diş yüzey kayıpları olarak tanımlanan atrizyon, abrazyon, erozyon ve abfraksiyon lezyonları etiyolojileri farklı olsa da temelde diş yapılarında değişiklikle kendilerini gösterir ve ‘‘diş aşınmaları’’ olarak nitelendirilir. Diş aşınmaları klinisyenler için ciddi bir problem oluşturmaktadır. Ancak özellikle terminolojideki farklılıklar ve diş sert doku kaybının teşhisinde, sınıflandırılmasında ve takibinde kullanılabilecek çok sayıda indeksin varlığı nedeniyle literatürdeki klinik ve epidemiyolojik çalışmaların yorumlanması oldukça zordur. Bu derlemenin amacı, diş aşınmalarını etiyolojilerine göre sınıflandırarak, günümüze kadar kullanılan değerlendirme indekslerinin evrimini analiz etmek ve bu indekslerin diş hekimliğindeki klinik ihtiyaçları karşılayıp karşılamadıklarını değerlendirmektir.
Despite the different etiologies of attrition, abrasion, erosion and abfraction lesions, which are defined as caries-free tooth surface losses, they are mainly manifested by changes in tooth structures and are considered to be ‘‘tooth wear’’. Tooth wear is a serious problem for clinicians. However, clinical and epidemiological studies in the literature are very difficult to interpret, especially due to differences in terminology and the presence of a large number of indices that can be used in the diagnosis, classification and follow-up of tooth hard tissue loss. The purpose of this review is to classify the tooth wear according to their etiology, to analyze the evolution of the evaluation indices used to date, and to evaluate whether they meet clinical needs in dentistry. ">

Diş aşınmalarının sınıflandırılması ve teşhiste kullanılan indeksler

Çürüksüz diş yüzey kayıpları olarak tanımlanan atrizyon, abrazyon, erozyon ve abfraksiyon lezyonları etiyolojileri farklı olsa da temelde diş yapılarında değişiklikle kendilerini gösterir ve ‘‘diş aşınmaları’’ olarak nitelendirilir. Diş aşınmaları klinisyenler için ciddi bir problem oluşturmaktadır. Ancak özellikle terminolojideki farklılıklar ve diş sert doku kaybının teşhisinde, sınıflandırılmasında ve takibinde kullanılabilecek çok sayıda indeksin varlığı nedeniyle literatürdeki klinik ve epidemiyolojik çalışmaların yorumlanması oldukça zordur. Bu derlemenin amacı, diş aşınmalarını etiyolojilerine göre sınıflandırarak, günümüze kadar kullanılan değerlendirme indekslerinin evrimini analiz etmek ve bu indekslerin diş hekimliğindeki klinik ihtiyaçları karşılayıp karşılamadıklarını değerlendirmektir.

Classification of tooth wear and indexes used in diagnosis

Despite the different etiologies of attrition, abrasion, erosion and abfraction lesions, which are defined as caries-free tooth surface losses, they are mainly manifested by changes in tooth structures and are considered to be ‘‘tooth wear’’. Tooth wear is a serious problem for clinicians. However, clinical and epidemiological studies in the literature are very difficult to interpret, especially due to differences in terminology and the presence of a large number of indices that can be used in the diagnosis, classification and follow-up of tooth hard tissue loss. The purpose of this review is to classify the tooth wear according to their etiology, to analyze the evolution of the evaluation indices used to date, and to evaluate whether they meet clinical needs in dentistry.

___

  • 1. Haddadin K, Rassas E, Masarweh N, Haddadin KH. Causes for tooth surface loss in a group of Jordanian population. Pak Oral Dent J 2015;35:129-134.
  • 2. Bartlett D, Ganss C, Lussi A. Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE): A new scoring system for scientific and clinical needs. Clin Oral Investig 2008;12:8-65.
  • 3. Bassiouny MA. Effect of sweetening agents in acidic beverages on associated erosion lesions. Gen Dent 2012;60:30-322.
  • 4. Rashid H, Hanif A, Nasim M. Tooth surface loss revisited: Classification, etiology, and management. J Restor Dent 2015;3:37-43.
  • 5. Kaidonis JA. Tooth wear: The view of the anthropologist. Clin Oral Investig 2008; 12: 6-21.
  • 6. Van’t Spijker A, Rodriguez JM, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Bartlett DW, et al. Prevalence of tooth wear in adults. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:35-42.
  • 7. Davies SJ, Gray RJM, Qualtrough AJ. Management of tooth surface loss. Br Dent J 2002;192:11-23.
  • 8. Bartlett DW, Fares J, Shirodaria S, Chiu K, Ahmad N, et al. The association of tooth wear, diet and dietary habits in adults aged 18-30 years old. J Dent 2011;39:811-816.
  • 9. Lussi A. Erosive tooth wear–A multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge. Monogr Oral Sci 2006;20:1-8.
  • 10. Azouzi I, kalghoum I, Hadyaoui D, Harzallah B, Cherif M. Principles and guidelines for managing tooth wear: A review. Intern Med Care 2018;2:1-9.
  • 11. Al-Zarea, Bader K. Tooth surface loss and associated risk factors in Northern Saudi Arabia. ISRN Dent 2012;1-5.
  • 12. Smith BGN, Bartlett DW, Robb ND. The prevalence, etiology and management of tooth wear in the United Kingdom. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:367-372.
  • 13. Wood I, Jawad Z, Paisley C, Brunton P. Non-carious cervical tooth surface loss: A literature review. J Dent 2008;36:759-766.
  • 14. Lussi A, Carvalho TS. Erosive tooth wear: A multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge. Monogr Oral Sci 2014;25:1-15.
  • 15. Lussi A, Schlueter N, Rakhmatullina E, Ganss C. Dental erosion-An overview with emphasis on chemical and histopathological aspects. Caries Res 2011;45:2-12.
  • 16. Grippo JO. Abfractions: A new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent 1991;3:14-19.
  • 17. Hobkirk JA. Tooth surface loss: causes and effects. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:340-341.
  • 18. Mair LH. Wear in dentistry-current terminology. J Dent 1992;20:140-144.
  • 19. Chu FCS, Yip HK, Newsome PRH, Chow TW, Smales RJ. Restorative management of the worn dentition: I. Aetiology and diagnosis. Dent Update 2002;29:162-168.
  • 20. Milosevic A, O’Sullivan E. Diagnosis, prevention and management of dental erosion: summary of an updated national guideline. Prim Dent Care 2008;15:11-12.
  • 21. Addy M, Shellis RP. Interaction between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci 2006;20:17-31.
  • 22. Alhilou A, Beddis HP, Mizban L, Seymour DW. Basic Erosive Wear Examination: assessment and prevention. Dent Nurs 2015;11:262-267.
  • 23. Ceruti P, Menicucci G, Mariani GD, Pittoni D, Gassino G. Non carious cervical lesions. A review. Minerva Stomatol 2006;55:43-57.
  • 24. Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, Cohen RE. Tooth wear: Attrition, erosion, and abrasion. Quintessence Int 2003;34:435-446.
  • 25. Imfeld T. Dental erosion. Definition, classification and links. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:151-155.
  • 26. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Stress-induced cervical lesions: review of advances in the past 10 years. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:487-494.
  • 27. Litonjua L, Andreana S, Cohen R. Toothbrush abrasions and noncarious cervical lesions: evolving concepts. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005;26:767-773.
  • 28. Mahalick JA, Knap FJ, Weiter EJ. Occusal wear in prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1971;82:154-159.
  • 29. Turner KA, Missirlian DM. Restoration of the extremely worn dentition. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:467-474.
  • 30. Levrini L, Di Benedetto G, Raspanti M. Dental wear: a scanning electron microscope study. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:340425.
  • 31. Smith BG, Knight JK. A comparison of patterns of tooth wear with aetiological factors. Br Dent J 1984;157:16-19. 32. Smith BG. Toothwear: aetiology and diagnosis. Dent Update 1989;16:204-212.
  • 33. Warreth A, Abuhijleh E, Almaghribi MA, Mahwal G, Ashawish A. Tooth surface loss: A review of literature. Saudi Dent J 2020;32:53-60.
  • 34. Rath A, Ramamurthy PH, Fernandes BA, Sidhu P. Effect of dried sunflower seeds on incisal edge abrasion: A rare case report. J Conserv Dent 2017;20:134-136.
  • 35. Meurman JH, Gate JM. Pathogenesis and modifying factors of dental erosion. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:199- 206.
  • 36. Wetselaar P, van der Zaag J, Lobbezoo F. Tooth wear, a proposal for an evaluation system. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2011;118:324-328.
  • 37. Eccles JD. Tooth surface loss from abrasion, attrition and erosion. Dent Update 1982;9:373-381.
  • 38. Goldstein RE, Curtis JW, Farley BA, Siranli S, Clark WA. Abfraction, Abrasion, Attrition, and Erosion. In: Goldstein RE, Chu SJ, Lee EA, Stappert CFJ, editors. Esthetics in dentistry. 3th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2018. p. 692- 719.
  • 39. Barbour ME, Rees GD. The role of erosion, abrasion and attrition in tooth wear. J Clin Dent 2006;17:88-93. 40. Eisenburger M. Degree of mineral loss in softened human enamel after acid erosion measured by chemical analysis. J Dent 2009;37:491-4.
  • 41. Claffey N. Essential oil mouthwashes: A key component in oral health management. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:22-24.
  • 42. Dawes C. What is the critical pH and why does a tooth dissolve in acid? J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:722-724.
  • 43. O’sullivan E, Milosevic A. UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry: diagnosis, prevention and management of dental erosion. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18:29-38.
  • 44. Zebrauskas A, Birskute R, Maciulskiene V. Prevalence of dental erosion among the young regular swimmers in Kaunas, Lithuania. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2014;5:6.
  • 45. West NX, Hughes JA, Addy M. Erosion of dentine and enamel in vitro by dietary acids: the effect of temperature, acid character, concentration and exposure time. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:875-880.
  • 46. Carvalho TS, Colon P, Ganss C, Huysmans MC, Lussi A, et al. Consensus report of the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry: Erosive tooth wear-diagnosis and management. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:1557-1561.
  • 47. Hara AT, Zero DT. The potential of saliva in protecting against dental erosion. Monogr Oral Sci 2014;25:197- 205.
  • 48. Hannig M, Balz M. Protective properties of salivary pellicles from two different intraoral sites on enamel erosion. Caries Res 2001;35:142-148.
  • 49. Hannig M, Fiebiger M, Güntzer M, Döbert A, Zimehl R, et al. Protective effect of the in situ formed short-term salivary pellicle. Arch Oral Biol 2004;49:903-910.
  • 50. Featherstone J, Lussi A. Understanding the chemistry of dental erosion. Monogr Oral Sci 2006;20:66-76.
  • 51. Honório HM, Rios D, Júnior ESP, de Oliveira DSB, Fior FA, et al. Effect of acidic challenge preceded by food consumption on enamel erosion. Eur J Dent 2010;4:412-417.
  • 52. Hattab FN, Yassin OM. Etiology and diagnosis of tooth wear: A literature review and presentation of selected cases. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:101-107.
  • 53. Mehta SB, Banerji S, Millar BJ, Suarez-Feito JM. Current concepts on the management of tooth wear: Part 1. Assessment, treatment planning and strategies for the prevention and the passive management of tooth wear. Br Dent J 2012;212:17-27.
  • 54. Krishna MG, Rao KS, Goyal K. Prosthodontic management of severely worn dentition: including review of literature related to physiology and pathology of increased vertical dimension of occlusion. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2005;5:89-93.
  • 55. Johansson AK, Lingström P, Imfeld T, Birkhed D. Influence of drinking method on tooth-surface pH in relation to dental erosion. Eur J Oral Sci 2004;112:484-489.
  • 56. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms: 9th Edition. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:1-105.
  • 57. Ghai, Singh K, Renuka, Gupta, Gaurav. The management of worn dentition-A systematic approach. Indian J Dent Sci 2013;5:136-141.
  • 58. Lee HE, Lin CL, Wang CH, Cheng CH, Chang CH. Stresses at the cervical lesion of maxillary premolar-A finite element investigation. J Dent 2002;30:283-290.
  • 59. Grippo JO, Simring M, Coleman TA. Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion, and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: A 20-year perspective. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24:10-23.
  • 60. Varma S, Preiskel A, Bartlett D. The management of tooth wear with crowns and indirect restorations. Br Dent J 2018;224:343-347.
  • 61. Rees JS, Hammadeh M, Jagger DC. Abfraction lesion formation in maxillary incisors, canines and premolars: A finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:149-154.
  • 62. Shellis RP, Addy M. The interactions between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci 2014;25:32-45.
  • 63. Harpenau LA, Noble WH, Kao RT. Diagnosis and management of dental wear. J Calif Dent Assoc 2011;39:225- 231.
  • 64. López-Frías FJ, Castellanos-Cosano L, Martán- González J, Llamas-Carreras JM, Segura-Egea JJ. Clinical measurement of tooth wear: Tooth wear indices. J Clin Exp Dent 2012;4:48-53.
  • 65. Loomans B, Opdam N, Sterenborg B, Attin T, Bartlett D, et al. Severe tooth wear: European consensus statement on management guidelines. J Adhes Dent 2017;19:111-119.
  • 66. McCay CM, Restarski JS, Bieri JG, Gobtner Jr. RA. Effects of acid beverages containing fluoride on the teeth and bones of dogs. Fed Proc 1946;5:147.
  • 67. Eccles JD. The treatment of dental erosion. J Dent 1978;6:217-221.
  • 68. Eccles JD. Dental erosion of nonindustrial origin. A clinical survey and classification. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:649-653.
  • 69. Bardsley PF, Taylor S, Milosevic A. Epidemiological studies of tooth wear and dental erosion in 14-year-old children in North West England. Part 1: The relationship with water fluoridation and social deprivation. Br Dent J 2004;197:413-416.
  • 70. Marro F, De Lat L, Martens L, Jacquet W, Bottenberg P. Monitoring the progression of erosive tooth wear (ETW) using BEWE index in casts and their 3D images: A retrospective longitudinal study. J Dent 2018;73:70-75.
  • 71. Kumar S, Keeling A, Osnes C, Bartlett D, O’Toole S. The sensitivity of digital intraoral scanners at measuring early erosive wear. J Dent. 2019;81:39-42.
  • 72. Valati F. Classification and treatment of the anterior maxillary dentition affected by dental erosion: the ACE classification. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30:559-571.
  • 73. Gandara BK, Truelove EL. Diagnosis and management of dental erosion. J Contemp Dent Pract 1999;1:16- 23.
  • 74. Lobbezoo F, Naeije M. Bruxism is mainly regulated centrally, not peripherally. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:1085- 1091.
  • 75. Mulic A, Tveit AB, Wang NJ, Hove LH, Espelid I et al. Reliability of two clinical scoring systems for dental erosive wear. Caries Res 2010;44:294-299.
  • 76. Ganss C, Lussi A. Diagnosis of erosive tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci 2014;25:22-31.
7tepe Klinik-Cover
  • ISSN: 2458-9586
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2005
  • Yayıncı: Yeditepe Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü
Academic Researches Index - FooterLogo