Sızıntı suyu membran konsantre akımının yönetiminde en uygun metodun analitik hiyerarşi prosesi ile belirlenmesi

Bu çalışmada membran biyoreaktör (MBR) sonrası membran prosesler (ultrafiltrasyon+nanofiltrasyon) ile arıtımı sağlanan sızıntı suyunun membran konsantre akımının yönetiminde, çevresel, ekonomik ve sosyal açıdan en uygun yöntemin Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) kullanılarak belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Evaporasyon, dolgu sahasına resirkülasyon, yakma, katılaştırma ve ileri arıtım alternatif bertaraf metotları arasından en uygun yöntemin belirlenmesinde kriter olarak, konsantre sızıntı suyu hacmi, suyun kompozisyonu, arıtım maliyeti, halkın onayı ve uygulanacak yöntemin esnekliği kriterleri seçilmiştir. AHP, Expert Choice 11 programı kullanılarak çözümlenmiştir. Analiz sonucunda alternatif yöntemlerin tercih sıralaması; Dolgu sahasına resirkülasyon (%31.8)>katılaştırma (%23.8)>ileri arıtım (%21.5)>yakma (%16.3)>evaporasyon (%6.6) şeklinde bulunmuştur. Bu sıralamanın oluşturulmasında her bir kriterin ağırlığının sıralaması ise; arıtım maliyeti (%49.2)>konsantre suyun içeriği (% 27.0)>konsantre suyun hacmi (%13.5)>arıtım yönteminin esnekliği (%6.5) >kamuoyu onayı (%3.7) şeklinde sıralanmıştır.

Determination of optimal method for management of leachate membrane concentrate by analytical hierarchy process

In this study, it was aimed to determine the most suitable method in terms of environmental, economic and social aspects by using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the management of leachate concentrate which is formed after leachate treatment by membrane bioreactor (MBR) following membrane processes (ultrafiltration+nanofiltration). For determining the most appropriate disposal method among the alternative methods of evaporation, recirculation to landfill, combustion, solidification and advanced treatment, criterias determined as; the concentrated leachate volume, the composition of water, the cost of treatment, the public approval and the flexibility of the method. AHP was analyzed using Expert Choice 11 software. As a result of the analysis, the preferred ranking of alternative methods was found as recirculation (31.8%)> solidification (23.8%)> advanced treatment (21.5%)> incineration (16.3%)> evaporation (6.6%). The ranking of the weight of each criterion of this ranking is; cost of treatment (49.2%)> composition of concentrated water (27.0%)> volume of concentrated water (13.5%)> flexibility of treatment method (6.5%)> public approval (3.7%).

___

  • Labiadh L, Fernandes A, Ciriaco L, Pacheco MJ, Gadri A, Ammar S, Lopes A. “Electrochemical treatment of concentrate from reverse osmosis of sanitary landfill leachate”. Journal of Environmental Management, 181, 515-521, 2016.
  • Salem Z, Hamouri K, Djemaa R, Allia K. “Evaluation of landfill leachate pollution and treatment”. Desalination, 220, 108-114, 2008.
  • Durmuşoğlu E, Yılmaz C. “Evaluation and temporal variation of raw and pre-treated leachate quality from an active solid waste landfill”. Water, Air & Soil Pollution, 171(1-4), 359-382, 2005.
  • Martin-Utrillas M, Reyes-Medina M, Curiel-Esparza J, Canto-Perello J. “Hybrid method for selection of the optimal process of leachate treatment in waste treatment and valorization plants or landfills”. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(4), 873-885, 2015.
  • Zhang L, Lavagnolo MC, Baid H, Pivatoc A, Ragac R, Yue D. “Environmental and economic assessment of leachate concentrate treatment technologies using analytic hierarchy process”. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 474-480, 2019.
  • Zhang QQ, Tian BH, Zhang X, Ghulam A, Fang CR, He R. “Investigation on characteristics of leachate and concentrated leachate in three landfill leachate treatment plants”. Waste Management, 33, 2277-2286, 2013.
  • Wang G, Lu G, Zhao J, Yin P, Zhao L. “Evaluation of toxicity and estrogenicity of the landfill-concentrated leachate during advanced oxidation treatment: chemical analyses and bioanalytical tools”. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23(16), 16015-24, 2016.
  • Top S, Sekman E, Hoşver S, Bilgili MS. “Characterization and electrocaogulative treatment of nanofiltration concentrate of a full-scale landfill leachate treatment plant”. Desalination, 268(1-3), 158-162, 2011.
  • Bruggen VB, Lejon L, Vandecasteele C. “Reuse treatment and discharge of the concentrate of pressure-driven membrane processes”. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(17), 3733-3738, 2003.
  • Wang H, Li X, Hao Z, Sun Y, Wang Y, Li W, Tsang Y. “Transformation of dissolved organic matter in concentrated leachate from nanofiltration during ozone-based oxidation processes (O3,O3/H2O2 and O3/UV)”. Journal of Environmental Management, 191, 244-251, 2017.
  • He R, Tian BH, Zhang QQ, Zhang HT. “Effect of Fenton oxidation on biodegradability, biotoxicity and dissolved organic matter distribution of concentrated landfill leachate derived from a membrane process”. Waste Management, 38, 232-239, 2015.
  • Kallel A, Ellouze M, Trabelsi I. “Co-management of landfill leachate concentrate with brick waste by solidification/stabilization treatment”. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10(4), 81, 1-12, 2017.
  • Calabrò PS, Sbaffoni S, Orsi S, Gentili E, Meoni C. “The landfill reinjection of concentrated leachate: findings from a monitoring study at an Italian site”. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 181, 962-968, 2010.
  • Long Y, Xu J, Shen D, Du Y, Feng H. “Effective removal of contaminants in landfill leachate membrane concentrates by coagulation”. Chemosphere, 167, 512-519, 2017.
  • Xie WG, Tong XG, Luo JW, Deng ZG, Qi Q, Chu Y. “Design of Leachate concentrate treatment project based on DTZ evaporation”. China Water Wastewater, 27, 56-60, 2011.
  • Talalaj IA, Biedka P. “Impact of concentrated leachate recirculation on effectiveness of leachate treatment by reverse osmosis”. Ecological Engineering, 85, 185-192, 2015.
  • Peters TA. “Purification of landfill leachate with membrane filtration”. Filtration & Separation, 35(1), 33-36, 1998.
  • Hunce SY, Akgul D, Demir G, Mertoglu B. “Solidification/stabilization of landfill leachate concentrate using different aggregate materials”. Waste Management, 32(7), 1394-1400, 2012.
  • Qiao M, Zhao X, Wei X. “Characterization and treatment of landfill leachate membrane concentrate by Fe2+/NaClO combined with advanced oxidation processes”. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1-9, 2018.
  • Morello L, Cossu R, Raga R, Pivato A, Lavagnolo MC. “Recirculation of re-verse osmosis concentrate in lab-scale anaerobic and aerobic landfill simulation re-actors”. Waste Management, 56, 262-270, 2016.
  • Dede Ş, Ulutaş A, Yiğit SK. “Research of leachate treatability with biological, physical, chemical and membrane bioreactor processes”. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 34(2), 199-209, 2016.
  • Bilgili MS, Demir A, Ozkaya B. “Influence of leachate recirculation on aerobic and anaerobic decomposition of solid wastes”. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 143, 177-183, 2007.
  • Ledakowicz S, Kaczorek K. “Laboratory simulation of anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste”. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A. Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering, 39(4), 859-71, 2004.
  • Öztürk İ, Onay TT, Çallı B, Mertoğlu B, Yıldız Ş. “Sızıntı Suyu Yönetimi Ihtisas Komisyonu Taslak Çalışma Raporu”. T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı Çevre Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, Türkiye, 2009-2010.
  • Yiğit S. Treatment Alternatives for Reverse Osmosis Concentrate of Landfill Leachat. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye, 2010.
  • Wang H, Wang YN, Li X, Sun Y, Wu H, Chen D. “Removal of humic substances from reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) concentrated leachate using continuously ozone generation-reaction treatment equipment”. Waste Management, 56, 271-279, 2016.
  • Subramani A, Jacangelo JG. “Treatment technologies for reverse osmosis concentrate volume minimization: A review”. Separation and Purification Technology, 122(10), 472-489, 2014.
  • Di Palma L, Ferrantelli P, Merli C, Petrucci E. “Treatment of industrial landfill leachate by means of evaporation and reverse osmosis”. Waste Management, 22, 951-955, 2002.
  • Berge ND, Reinhart DR, Batarseh ES. “An assessment of bioreactor landfill costs and benefits”. Waste Management, 29, 1558-1567, 2009.
  • Karahalios H. “The application of the AHP-TOPSIS for evaluating ballast water treatment systems by ship operators”. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 172-184, 2017.
  • Wang G, Qin L, Li G, Chen L. “Landfill site selection using spatial information technologies and AHP: A case study in Beijing, China”. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(8), 2414-2421, 2009.
  • Dos Santos PH, Neves SM, Sant’Anna DO, Oliveira CH, Carvalho H.D. “The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 119-138, 2019.
  • Saaty TL. “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process”. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1, 83-98, 2008.
  • Nasution MDTP, Rossanty Y, Daengs GS. A, Sahat S, Rosmawati R, Kurniasih N, Saleh Ahmar A, Susanto E, Novitasari Y, Suhardi S, Abd. Kadir I, Rahim R. “Decision support rating system with analytical hierarchy process method”. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2/3), 105-108, 2018.
  • Saaty TL. “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures”. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281, 1977.
  • Gong Y, Lu J, Jiang W, Liu S, Wang W, Li A. “Gasification of landfill leachate in supercritical water: Effects on hydrogen yield and tar formation”. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(51), 22827-22837, 2018.
Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-7009
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Üreaz ve karbonik anhidraz pozitif bakteriler tarafindan kalsiyum karbonat çökelimi

Naime Nur BOZBEYOĞLU, Tuğba ŞENSOY CANDOĞAN, Şevki ARSLAN, Buket KABALAY, Ömer BOZKAYA, Erdal AKYOL, Nazime MERCAN DOĞAN

Sızıntı suyu membran konsantre akımının yönetiminde en uygun metodun analitik hiyerarşi prosesi ile belirlenmesi

Nevim GENÇ, Elif DURNA

Yemişliçay Formasyonu içindeki (sub)volkanik birimlerin 40Ar/39Ar jeokronolojisi, mineral- ve tüm-kayaç jeokimyası, Sinop Güneyi (Orta Pontidler)

Kürşad ASAN, Hüseyin KURT

Doğrusal sismik izolasyon parametrelerinin karga arama algoritması ile optimizasyonu

Ali Erdem ÇERÇEVİK, Özgür AVŞAR

Polimineral içerikli seramik bir numunenin lüminesans tekniklerle eşdeğer dozunun belirlenmesinde farklı bir yöntemin kullanımı

Mehmet Altay ATLIHAN

Geniş başlıklı savağın membasındaki türbülanslı akımın deneysel olarak incelenmesi

Elif Deniz ATLAS, Mehmet Anıl KIZILASLAN, Ender DEMİREL

Kordon bazlı trafik tıkanıklık fiyatlandırılmasına örnek bir uygulama: Erzurum, Cumhuriyet Caddesi

Muhammed Yasin ÇODUR, Harun COŞKUN

Avrupa Birliği üye ülkeler ve aday olan Türkiye’nin atık indikatörlerine göre kümelenmesinde optimum küme sayısının Silhouette indeksi ile belirlenmesi

Tuğba SÖKÜT AÇAR, Nilgün AYMAN ÖZ

Güneş ışığı altında C₃N₄/DEU-51(Fe) kullanılarak Cr(VI)’nın giderimi

Sevil AKÇAĞLAR

SINTACS yöntemi ile karstik ortamlarda yeraltısuyu duyarlılığının belirlenmesi: Altınova akiferi örneği

Ayşenur AMİL, Ahmet ÇİL, Pınar AVCI, Ayşe MUHAMMETOĞLU, Naciye Nur ÖZYURT