Novice Teachers’ Experiences of Induction in Selected Primary Schools in Namibia1

Problem Statement: Many schools use induction programmes with the aim of contributing to novice teachers’ well-being and professional development. However, the content of induction programmes varies across schools and countries. Given that existing studies do not conclusively establish the programme components with the greatest potential to affect the quality and retention of novice teachers, more research is needed to explore the aspects of induction programmes that are most productive.Purpose of the Study: This exploratory qualitative multi-case study aimed to gain more insight into how novice teachers in Namibia perceive and experience their induction support. The specific research question that guided this study was: What is the current state of practice in Namibia to support novice teachers with induction programmes?Method: In order to answer the guiding research question, the inquiry followed a qualitative approach. The small sample of eight novice teachers who had finished the induction period and had taught for one to two years was purposefully selected from two primary schools to participate in the study. The schools were selected on the basis of the following criteria: (1) proximity to the researcher, since the researcher is a resident of Namibia; (2) the number of sites manageable in terms of time, distance and cost; (3) availability of more than one novice teacher who graduated recently, making the sites relevant to the study; and (4) location of schools in different circuits to aim for different insights and experiences. Data collected through the focus group sessions were transcribed verbatim. An analysis followed an on-going and iterative non-linear process that identified common themes.Findings: After analysis and interpretation of the literature and empirical findings, it was discovered that many schools in Namibia seem to use a form of induction programmes for novice teachers. However, based on the current study, it became apparent that some schools in Namibia use induction programmes with low-intensity activities, while others use induction programmes with high-intensity activities. Based on the interviews with the participants, the following themes in which induction programme activities differed were identified: the intensity/duration of the induction programme; resources offered in relation to induction programmes; the format/structure of support being used in the induction programme; the content of the induction programme; and lastly, the mentoring. Consequently, practical implications and recommendations to improve on these variations were offered. Conclusions and Recommendations: In order to achieve its intended objectives, induction programmes have to be well organized and facilitated in schools. The study provides the following recommendations to establish this organization: there must be sufficient resources and mentors for all new teachers; mentors should be afforded opportunities to be capacitated so that they can offer professional guidance to novices; mentors and novice teachers should be afforded considerable time to spend on induction programme activities; timetables of mentors and novice teachers have to match with those of induction programmes; a physical space/office should be made available for meetings between mentors and novice teachers; and novice teachers should be allocated a reasonable teaching workload as compared to veteran teachers. Schools should use induction programmes with high-intensity activities in order to increase teacher effectiveness and retention.

Keywords:

Novice teachers, experiences, low intensity induction programmes high intensity induction programmes, Namibia.,

PDF

___

Athaneses, S. Z., & Achinstein, B. (2003). Focusing new teachers on individual and low performing students: The centrality of formative assessment in the mentor's repertoire of practice. Teachers College Record, 105(8),1486-1520.
Beijaard, D., Buitink, J., & Kessels, C. (2010). Teacher induction. In B. McGaw, P. L. Peterson & E. Baker (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education 3rd Edition. Oxford: Elsevier Scientific Publishers.
Britton, E., Raizen, S., Paine, L., & Huntley, M.A. (2000). More swimming, less sinking. Perspectives on Teacher Induction in the US and Abroad. Paper presented at the National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching in the 21 st Century, San Francisco
Camp, W.G., & Heath, B. (1988). Structuring the induction process for beginning vocational teachers. In W. G. Camp and B. Heath (Eds.), On becoming a teacher: Vocational education and the induction process (pp. 105-119). Berkley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
Carver, C. L., & Katz, D. S. (2004). Teaching at the boundary of acceptable practice: What is a new teacher mentor to do? Journal of Teacher Education, 55(5), 449-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487104269524.
Cherubini, L. (2007). Speaking up and speaking freely: Beginning teachers’ critical perceptions of their professional induction. The Professional Educator, 29(1), 1-12.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research, techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd Ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Creswell, J.W. (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches. 2nd edition. California: Sage.
Creswell, J.W. (2013) Qualitative inquiry & research design. Choosing among five approaches. 3rd edition. Los Angeles: Sage.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001a). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1013-1055. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00141
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2003). What new teachers need to learn. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 25-29
Fulton, K., Yoon, I., & Lee, C. (2005, August). Induction into learning communities. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
Glazerman, S., Isenberg, E., Dolfin, S., Bleeker, M., Johnson, A., Grider, M., & Jacobus, M. (2010). Impacts of Comprehensive Induction: Final Results from a Randomized Controlled Study (NCEE 2010-4028). http://ies.ed.gov/ncee (Accessed 21August 2011).
Greeff, M. (2011). Information collection: Interviewing. In Research at Grassroots for the social sciences and human service professions. 4th edition. AS. De Vos, H. Strydom, CB. Fouche`, & CSL. Delport. Editors. Pretoria: Van Schaik, 341-347.
Hellsten, L.M., Prytula, M.P., Ebanks, A., & Lai, H. (2009). Teacher Induction: Exploring Beginning Teacher Mentorship. Canadian Journal of Education, 32(4), 703-733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00298.
Hudson, S.M., Beutel, D.A., & Hudson, B.P. (2008). Beginning teachers’ perceptions of their induction into teaching. In proceedings PEPE (Practical Experiences in Professional Education) International Conference .Edinburgh .http://eprints.qut.edu.au/ (Accessed 22 April 2011).
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. 4th edition. Los Angeles: Sage.
Kessels, C.C. (2010). The influence of induction programmes on beginning teachers’ well-being and professional development. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Leiden University Graduate School of Teaching.
Kidd, L., Brown, N., & Fitzallen, N. (2015). Beginning teachers’ perception of their induction into teaching profession. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 154-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v40n3.10.
Little, J., W. (1990). The mentor phenomenon and the social organization of teaching. In B. C. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in Education, 16, (pp. 259-297). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1167355
McCollum, I.P. (2014). Beginning teachers’ perceptions of a teacher mentoring program. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Walden University, Faculty of Education: USA.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Moir, E. (2003, July). Launching the next generation of teachers through quality induction. Paper presented at the State Partners Symposium of the National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future. Denver, CO. Retrieved June 9, 2008, from http://www.eric.ed.gov
Mokoena, S.P. (2012). Student teachers’ expectations of teaching as a career choice in South Africa (Part 1). International Journal of Social Sciences, 31(2), 117-126.
Moore, L.L., & Swan, B.G. (2008). Developing best practices of teacher education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 49(4), 60-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.5032/jae.2008.04060
Namibia. Ministry of Education. (2006). National professional standards for teachers in Namibia. Windhoek: Government Printer.
Namibia. Ministry of Education. (2009). Namibia Novice Teacher Induction Programme. Okahandja: NIED. Newby, P. (2010). Research methods for education. England: Pearson
Stansbury, K., & Zimmerman, J. (2000). Lifelines to the classroom: Designing support for beginning teachers. (WestEd Knowledge Brief). San Francisco: West Ed.
Wang, J., & Odell, S. J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to Standards-based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003481
Willis, J. W. (2007). Foundation of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approach. USA: Sage.
Wong, H. (2004). Induction programs that keep new teachers teaching and improving. NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 41-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019263650408863804
Yusko, B., & Feiman Nemser, S. (2008). Embracing contraries: Combining assistance and assessment in new teacher induction. Teachers College Record, 110(5), 923-953.