Exploring the Changing Face of School Inspections

Exploring the Changing Face of School Inspections

Background: A number of countries have had school inspection for many years. The origins of these systems date back to the nineteenth century when mass public schooling was introduced, and education and other emerging public services were required to comply with centrally mandated rules and programmes. In contrast, many countries across the world have only introduced school inspection over recent decades as the perceived importance of educational quality as a driver of economic competitiveness has become influential in state policy. International bodies such as the OECD and, in particular, comparative evaluations of education systems such as PISA have led to a constant stream of interventions and reforms designed to deliver higher student performance outcomes. These factors have driven the growth of inspection. Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study is to provide an analysis of the factors that have led to the rapid rise of inspection as a school governance mechanism. It goes on to examine how developing conceptualisations of the ways in which inspection can be employed to achieve the range of outcomes with which it is tasked are leading to an evolving toolkit of inspection approaches and models. A number of these are examined in detail with a view not only to description but in terms of whether some of the demands that they place on schools are, in fact, realistic in practice. Sources of Evidence: This study used document analysis of policy documents and existing research to deconstruct factors relating to the changing face of school inspection since the late 1990's. Main Argument: Formal processes of school inspection have become virtually universal. It is also argued that inspection, as it is now widely understood and practiced, has moved quite far from its historical roots and purposes. Inspection is now a complex component of wider modern concepts of public sector management and governance including quality, improvement, accountability, transparency and cost effectiveness. Conclusions: Historically inspection was largely about compliance with rules and to an extent to judge the work of individual teachers. Now, at least, in theory, it is as much concerned with creating a regulatory framework within which schools as organisations can enjoy greater autonomy while simultaneously being held responsible for student performance outcomes.

___

  • Alvik, T. (1996) Self-evaluation: what, why, how, by whom, for whom? Dundee: Scottish Consultative Council on the Curriculum.American Statistical Association. (ASA) (2014) ASA Statement on Using Value-Added
  • Models for Educational Assessment. Available at:
  • http://www.amstat.org/policy/pdfs/ASA_VAM_Statement.pdf (accessed May 1 2014).
  • Ball, S. (2012) Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary. United Kingdom: Routledge.
  • Ball, S. (2003) The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2): 215-228.
  • Barber, M. & Moursehead, M. (2009) Shaping the Future: How Good Education Systems Can Become Great in the Decade Ahead - Report on the International Education Roundtable, July 7. Available at: http://www.mckinsey.com/locations/southeastasia/knowledge/Education_Round table.pdf (accessed 20 April 2014).
  • Barnett, R. (1994) Power, Enlightenment and Quality Evaluation. European Journal of Education, Wiley, 29(2): 165-179.
  • Beckmann, A., Cooper, C. & Hill, D. (2009) Neoliberalisation and managerialisation of 'education' in England and Wales-a case for reconstructing education. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 7 (2): 311-345.
  • Brown, M. (2013) Deconstructing Evaluation in Education: The case of Ireland. PhD Thesis, Dublin City University, Ireland.
  • Cambridge, J. & Carthew, C. (2007) Schools Self-evaluating Their International Values: a Case Study. In: Hayden M, Thompson J, and Levy J (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Research in International Education, United Kingdom: Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 283-298.
  • Coe, R. & Visscher, A. (2006) School Improvement Through Performance Feedback. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
  • Considine, M. (2002) The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships, and Joined-Up Services. Governance, 15(1): 21-40.
  • Davis, H. & Martin, S. (2008a) The Rise of Public Service Inspection. In: Davis H, and Martin M (eds), Public Service Inspection in the UK, United Kingdom: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 7-19.
  • Davis, H. and Martin, S. (2008b) The Future of Public Service Inspection. In: Davis H., and Martin, M. (eds), Public Service Inspection in the UK, United Kingdom: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 135-152.
  • Dedering, K. and Müller, S. (2010) School improvement through inspections? First empirical insights from Germany. Journal of Educational Change, Springer, 12(3): 301-322.
  • Department of Education, Ontario. (2007) Ontario statistical neighbours - Informing our strategy to improve student achievement. Available at: http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/osneng.pdf (accessed March 19 2014)
  • Donaldson, G. (2013) The SICI Bratislava memorandum on inspection and innovation. Available at: http://www.sici-inspectorates.eu/About-us/Vision-mission/TheBratislava-Memorandum-is-on-the-Website (accessed October 20 2014).
  • Donaldson, G., Looney, A. & Nusche D. et al (2012) OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: Portugal. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Durrant J. and Holden G. (2005) Teachers leading change: Doing research for school improvement. London: Paul Chapman Educational Publishing.
  • Ehren, M. Altrichter H., McNamara G. et al. (2013) Impact of school inspections on improvement of schools--describing assumptions on causal mechanisms in six European countries. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25(1): 343.
  • Ehren, M. Altrichter, H. McNamara, G. et al. (2011) School Inspections: Studying the impact of school inspection on improvement of schools. Available at: http://schoolinspections.eu/home/the-project/ (accessed 24 December 2013)
  • Etzioni, A. (2010) Is transparency the best disinfectant? The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (4): 389-404.
  • Ferrer, A. (2010) Teachers in charge? Internal school assessment and evaluation in Europe. In: Stoney S (eds), Beyond Lisbon 2010: Perspectives from research and development for education policy in Europe (CIDREE Yearbook 2010), Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research, pp. 119-137.
  • Gaertner, H. Wurster, S. & Pant, H.A. (2013) The effect of school inspections on school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(4): 489-508.
  • Gordon, L. & Whitty, G. (1997) Giving the 'Hidden Hand' a Helping Hand? The rhetoric and reality of neoliberal education reform in England and New Zealand. Comparative Education, 33(3): 453-467.
  • Grek, S. (2014) Travelling inspectors and the making of Europe: Education policy learning and the case of the Scottish school inspectorate. SISYPHUS Journal of education, 2 (1): 40-61.
  • Grek, S. Lawn, M. Ozga, J. et al (2013) Governing by inspection? European inspectorates and the creation of a European education policy space. Comparative Education, 49(4): 486-502.
  • Hall, C. & Noyes, A. (2009) New regimes of truth: The impact of performative school self evaluation systems on teachers' professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(6): 850-856.
  • Hamzah, M., & Tahir, H. (2013) A Glimpse Into School Self-Evaluation in Malaysia: Are We Doing The Right Things? Or Are We Doing the Things Right? Asian Social Science, 9 (12): 50-51.
  • Hislop, H. (2012) The quality assurance of Irish schools and the role of evaluation: current and future trends - Professor Seamus Ó Súilleabháin Memorial Lecture. Available at: http://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Inspection-ReportsPublications/Evaluation-Reports-Guidelines/The-Quality-Assurance-of-IrishSchools-and-the-Role-of-Evaluation-Current-and-Future-Trends.pdf (accessed 16 December 2014).
  • Huber, S. (2011) School governance in Switzerland: tensions between new roles and old traditions. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39 (4):469- 485.
  • Karsten, S. (1999) Neoliberal education reform in the Netherlands. Comparative Education, 35 (3): 303-317.
  • Leithwood, K. Harris, A. and Strauss, T. (2010) Leading school turnaround: how successful leaders transform low-performing schools. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Lindberg, S. (2013) Mapping accountability: core concept and subtypes. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79 (2): 202-226.
  • MacBeath, J. (2012) Learning in and out of school: the selected works of John MacBeath. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • MacBeath, J. (2010) School based evaluation: purposes, protocols and processes. In: Peterson P, Baker E and McGaw B (eds), International encyclopedia of education (3rd edition), Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 713-718.
  • MacBeath, J. (2008a) Leading learning in the self-evaluating school. School Leadership & Management, 28, (4): 385-399.
  • MacBeath, J. (2008b) Stories of compliance and subversion in a prescriptive policy environment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36 (1): 123- 148.
  • MacBeath, J. (2006) School inspection and self-evaluation: working with the new relationship. London: Taylor and Francis.
  • MacBeath, J. (1999) Schools must speak for themselves: the case for school self-evaluation. London: Routledge.
  • McKinney, J., and Howard, L. (1998) Public Administration: Balancing Power and Accountability. United States: Praeger Publishers Inc.
  • McNamara, G., and Nayir, K. (2014) The Increasingly Central Role of School SelfEvaluation in Inspection Systems across Europe: The Case of Ireland. Turkish Journal of Education, 3 (1): 48-59.
  • McNamara, G., and O'Hara, J. (2008a) The importance of the concept of self- evaluation in the changing landscape of education policy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34 (3): 173-179.
  • McNamara, G., and O'Hara J. (2008b) Trusting schools and teachers: developing educational professionalism through self-evaluation. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Martin, S. (2008) Inspection of Education and Skills. In: Davis H, and Martin M (eds), Public Service Inspection in the UK, United Kingdom: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 52-68.
  • Miliband, D. (2004) Personalised Learning: Building a New Relationship with Schools. London: Department for Education and Skills.
  • Nevo, D. (2010) Internal and external evaluation. In: Peterson P, Baker E and McGaw B (eds), International encyclopedia of education (3rd edition), Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 781-785.
  • Nevo, D. (2002) Dialogue evaluation: combining internal and external evaluation. In: Nevo (eds), School-based evaluation: an international perspective, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 3-16.
  • Nusche, D., Laveault, D., MacBeath, J. et al. (2012) OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: New Zealand 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • O'Neill, O. (2011) Keynote interview with Baroness Onora O'Neill: British Educational Research Association (BERA) Conference. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orRhAmIysFQ. (accessed 23 December 2014).
  • Ozga, J. (2012) Governing knowledge: data, inspection and education policy in Europe. Globalisation, Societies and Education 10 (4): 439-455.
  • Perry, C. (2013) Approaches to school inspection. Belfast: Northern Ireland Assembly. Perryman, J. (2006) Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21 (2): 147-161.
  • Power, M. (2003) Evaluating the audit explosion. Law & policy, 25 (3): 185-202.
  • Rönnberg, L., Lindgren, J., & Segerholm, C. (2013) In the public eye: Swedish school inspection and local newspapers: exploring the audit-media relationship. Journal of Education Policy, 28(2): 178-197.
  • Santiago, P. (2013a) The focus on evaluation and assessment. In: Nusche D, Radinger D, Santiago P., et al (eds), OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment in Santiago, P. (2013b) Trends in evaluation and assessment. In: Nusche D, Radinger D, Santiago P et al (eds), OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment in Education. Synergies for Better Learning. An international perspective on Evaluation and Assessment, Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 35-57.
  • Santiago P., Donaldson G., Herman J., et al. (2011) OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Australia. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Scheerens J., Glas C., & Thomas S. (2003) Educational evaluation, assessment, and monitoring: a systemic approach. [Kindle Edition 1.10.1]. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Shewbridge, C. (2013) School evaluation: From compliancy to quality. In: Nusche D, Radinger D, Santiago P, et al (eds), OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment in Education. Synergies for Better Learning. An international perspective on Evaluation and Assessment, Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 383-485.
  • Shewbridge, C., Hulshof, M., Nusche, D., et al (2014) OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom. Paris: OECD Publishing. Simons, H. (2013) Enhancing the Quality of Education through School Self-Evaluation. Advances in Program Evaluation, (14): 1-18.
  • Simons, H. (2004) Utilizing evaluation evidence to enhance professional practice. Evaluation, 10 (4): 410-429.
  • Strakova, J., and Simonová, J. (2013) Assessment in the school systems of the Czech Republic. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(4): 470-490.
  • Tan, C. (2013) Learning from Shanghai: Lessons on achieving educational success. Dodrecht: Springer. Thomas, G. (1998) A brief history of the genesis of the new schools' inspection system.
  • British Journal of Educational Studies, 46 (4): 415-427.
  • Thompson, G., & Cook, I. (2014) Education policy-making and time. Journal of Education Policy, 29 (5): 700-715.
  • Van Amelsvoort, G., & Janssens, F. (2008) School self-evaluation and school inspection in Europe. Educational Research and Evaluation, 34 (1): 15-23.
  • Van Bruggen, J. (2010a) Inspectorates of Education in Europe; some comparative remarks about their tasks and work. Brussels: SICI.
  • Van Bruggen, J. (2010b) The role of school inspection in ensuring quality in education: past, present and future. In: Stoney S (eds), Beyond Lisbon 2010: Perspectives from research and development for education policy in Europe (CIDREE Yearbook 2010), Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research, pp.119-137.
  • Vanhoof, J. and Van Petegem, P. (2007) Matching internal and external evaluation in an era of accountability and school development: lessons from a Flemish perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33 (2): 101-119.
  • Whitby, K. (2010) School inspection: recent experiences in high performing education systems; literature review. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
  • World Bank. (2007) Bulgaria - Education and Skills for the Knowledge Economy. A Policy Note. Available at:
  • http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTBULGARIA/Resources/EducationPolicyN ote_EN.pdf . (accessed 4 January 2014).