Ali Canip Yöntem’in eğitim ve edebiyat eğitimi hakkındaki düşünceleri

Türkiye’de eğitim üzerindeki fikirler ve çabalar Tanzimat’tan sonra hızlanmıştır. Tanzimat’tan sonra Batılı eğitim anlayışlarının ülkede hâkim olması ve Batılı okulların açılması önemli eğitim hareketleridir. Ali Canip Yöntem, eğitim hakkındaki ilk fikirlerini II. Meşrutiyet’ten sonra ortaya koymuştur. Eğitim ve edebiyat eğitimi hakkındaki fikirlerinin ise Cumhuriyet döneminde zenginleştiği ve uygulamaya geçtiği görülmektedir. Ali Canip Yöntem, 1924’te ilk Türkçe-Edebiyat programlarının hazırlanmasında görev almış, bu program hakkında eleştiri ve önerilerini ortaya koymuştur. Ali Canip Yöntem, edebiyat eğitimine edebiyat dersleri için ders kitabı ve yardımcı ders kitabı yazarak da katkıda bulunmuştur. Araştırma, Ali Canip Yöntem edebiyat eğitimi hakkındaki fikirleri ve yazdığı ders kitaplarıyla Türk eğitim tarihindeki önemini ve katkısını ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır.

In Turkey, more ideas were generated and more effort was spent on education after Tanzimat. Following this period, westernized education understandings’ becoming dominant in the country and the opening of western schools were important education movements. Ali Canip Yöntem put forward his first ideas on education after the Second Constitutional period. Yet it is observed that his ideas on education and literature education grew rich and were put into practice during the Republican Period. Ali Canip Yöntem also served in the preparation of the first Turkish-Literature programs in 1924 and rendered his critics and suggestions about them. Ali Canip Yöntem contributed to literaure education by penning literature coursebooks and workbooks as well. The present study aims to reveal Ali Canip Yöntem’s ideas on literature education and his importance in and contribution to the Turkish literature history together with the coursebooks he penned.

___

  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In: K. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.) , Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Barron, A. 2003. Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: learning how to do things. Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Billmyer, K., 1990a. I really like your lifestyle: ESL learners learning how to compliment. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 6 (2), 31– 48.
  • Billmyer, K., 1990b. I really like your lifestyle: ESL learners learning how to compliment. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 6, 31–48.
  • Bouton, L.F. (1994a). Can NNS skill in interpreting implicature in American English be improved through explicit instruction? A pilot study. In: L. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds), Pragmatics and Language Learning Monograph Series, vol. 5. Division of English as an International Language (pp. 88-109). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
  • Bouton, L. F. (1994b). Conversational implicature in a second language: Learned slowly when not deliberately taught. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 157-167.
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. 1978/1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative Competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 5-35.
  • Cheng, W. 2003. Intercultural Conversation: A Study of Hong Kong Chinese. Philadelphia, PA, USA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Fukuya, Y., & Clark, M. (2001). A comparison of input enhancement and explicit instruction of mitigators. In: L. Bouton (Ed.) , Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph Series, vol. 10. Division of English as an International Language (pp. 111-130). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
  • Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor. Holtgraves, T. (1998). Interpreting Indirect Replies. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 1-27.
  • Holtgraves, T. (2005). Social Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, and Linguistic Politeness. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture,1, 73-93.
  • House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, 225-52.
  • Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? (NetWork #6) [HTML document]. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Retrieved October, 26, 2001, from www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW06. Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 149-69.
  • Kasper, G. & Rose, K. R. (1999). Pragmatics and SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 81-104.
  • Kasper, G., Rose, K.R. 2002. Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Mahwah, NJ: Blackwell. Kim, D., & Hall, J. K. (2002). The role of an interactive book reading program in the development of second language pragmatic competence. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 332-348.
  • King, K. A., & Silver, R. E. (1993). "Sticking points": Effects of instruction on NNS refusal strategies. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 9, 47-82.
  • Kubota, M. (1995). Teachability of conversational implicature to Japanese EFL learners. IRLT Bulletin 9, 35–67.
  • Liddicoat, A., & Crozet, C. (2001). Acquiring French interactional norms through instruction. In: K. Rose, & G. Kasper. (Eds.) , Pragmatics in Language Teaching (pp. 125-144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Martı ́nez-Flor, A., Fukuya, Y.J. (2005). The effects of instruction on learners production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System 33 (3). Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
  • Olshtain, E., & Cohen, A. (1990). The learning of complex speech act behavior. TESL Canadan Journal, 7, 45-65.
  • Rose, K., & Ng, C. (2001). Inductive and deductive teaching of compliments and compliment responses. In: K. Rose, & G. Kasper. (Eds.) , Pragmatics in Language Teaching (pp. 145–170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics. System 33, 385-399.
  • Safont, M. P. (2003). Instructional effects on the use of request acts modificatoin devices by EFL learners. In: A. Martı ́nez-Flor, E. Uso ́, & A. Ferna ́ndez. (Eds.) , Pragmatic Competence and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 211-232). Spain: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I, Castello ́n.
  • Salazar, P. C. (2003). Pragmatic instruction in the EFL context. In: A. Martı ́nez- Flor, E. Uso ́, & A. Ferna ́ndez. (Eds.) , Pragmatic Competence and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 233-246). Spain: Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I, Castello ́n. Silva, A. J. B. (2003).
  • The Effects Of Instruction On Pragmatic Development: Teaching Polite Refusals in English. [PDF document]. University of Hawai'i, Working Papers in Second Language Studies, 22(1), Fall 2003, pp. 55-106. from http://www.hawaii.edu/sls/?link=working_papers.
  • Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In: In: K. Rose, & G. Kasper. (Eds.) , Pragmatics in Language Teaching (pp. 171-199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tannen, D. (1985).
  • Silence: anything but. In: D. Tannen, & Saville-Troike (Eds.), Perspectives on Silence (pp. 93-112). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Tateyama, Y. (2001). Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatics routines: Japanese sumimasen. In: K. Rose, & G. Kasper. (Eds.) , Pragmatics in Language Teaching (pp. 200-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tateyama, Y., Kasper, G., Mui, L.P., Tay, H., Thananart, O. (1997). Explicit and implicit teaching of Japanese pragmatics routines. In: L. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph Series, vol. 8. Division of English as an International Language (pp. 163-178).
  • Urbana- Champaign, IL: University of Illinois. Wildner-Bassett, M. 1984. Improving pragmatic aspects of learners' interlanguage: A comparison of methodological approaches for teaching gambits to advanced adult learners of English in industry. Tubingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
  • Wildner-Bassett, M. (1986). Teaching and learning 'polite noises': Improving pragmatic aspects of advanced adult learners' interlanguage. In: G. Kasper (Ed.), Learning, teaching, and communication in the foreign language classroom (pp. 163-177). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
  • Wishnoff, J. (2000). Hedging your bets: L2 learners’ acquisition of pragmatic devices in academic writing and computer-mediated discourse [PDF document]. University of Hawai'i, Working Papers in Second Language Studies, 19 (1), Fall 2000, pp. 119-157.from http://www.hawaii.edu/sls/?link=working_papers
Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 1986
  • Yayıncı: Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi