___

• Bahari, A. (2018a). Nonlinear dynamic motivation-oriented telecollaborative model of language learning via formulaic sequences to foster learner autonomy. The Journal of Teaching English with Technology. 18(3), 65–81, http://www.tewtjournal.org
• Bahari, A. (2018b). Sacred text motivation for general l2 learners: a mixed methods study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9316-3
• Bahari, A. (2018c). Developing Listening and Speaking via A Psycho-Socio-Cultural Learning Model Based on Non-Linear Dynamic Motivation. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literature. 10(2), 35–58.
• Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
• Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2015). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and teachers’ practices. In H. Fives & M. Gregoire Hill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 66–84). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29–45.
• Chang, L. Y. H. (2010). Group processes and EFL learners' motivation: A study of group dynamics in EFL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 129–154.
• Chartrand, T. L., Dalton, A. N., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2007). Nonconscious relationship reactance: When significant others prime opposing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 719–726.
• Chowning, K., & Campbell, N. J. (2009). Development and validation of a measure of academic entitlement: Individual differences in students' externalized responsibility and entitled expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 982–997.
• Ciani, K. D., Summers, J. J., & Easter, M. A. (2008). Gender differences in academic entitlement among college students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 169(4), 332–344.
• Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students’ relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 467– 498.
• Cranton, P. (2011). A transformative perspective on the scholarship of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 30, 75–86.
• de Bot, K., Lowie, W. & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10 (1), 7–21.
• de Bot, K. and Larsen Freeman, L. (2011). Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In M.H. Verspoor, K. de Bot and W. Lowie (eds) A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development: Methods and Techniques (pp. 5–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
• Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
• Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P.D. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety: The right and left feet of FL learning? In: P.D. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 215–236). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Dewaele, J.-M., MacIntyre, P.D., Boudreau, C., & Dewaele, L. (2016). Do girls have all the fun? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 2, 41–63.
• Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144-168. doi:10.1080/03637750500111815
• Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system. In Z. Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Researching complex dynamic systems: ‘Retrodictive qualitative modelling’ in the language classroom. Language Teaching 40 (1), 80–91.
• Dörnyei, Z., Henry, A., & Muir, C. (2016). Motivational currents in language learning: Frameworks for focused interventions. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
• Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge. Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P., & Henry, A. (Eds.). (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
• Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Driver, R. Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.
• Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39 –72.
• Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1994). Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 113–137. doi:10.1006/jesp.1994.1006
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners’ classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399–484.
• Fives, H., & Gill, M. G. (Eds.). (2015). International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Fives, H., Lacatena, N., & Gerard, L. (2015).Teachers’ beliefs about teaching (and learning). In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 249–265). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Foster, J. D., Campbell, W. K., & Twenge, J. M. (2003). Individual differences in narcissism: Inflated self views across the lifespan and around the world. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 469–486.
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
• Fusella, P.V. (2013). Dynamic Systems Theory in Cognitive Science: Major Elements, Applications, and Debates Surrounding a Revolutionary Meta-Theory. Dynamical Psychology 2013 – dynapsyc.org. See http://dynapsyc.org/2013/Fusella.pdf
• Greenberger, E., Lessard, J., Chen, C., & Farruggia, S. P. (2008). Self‐ entitled college students: Contributions of personality, parenting, and motivational factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(10), 1193–1204.
• Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
• Harlen, W. (2007). The Quality of Learning: Assessment Alternatives for Primary Education, Primary Review Research Survey 3/4, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.
• Henry, A., Dörnyei, Z., & Davydenko, S. (2015). The anatomy of directed motivational currents: Exploring intense and enduring periods of L2 motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 329–345.
• Hiver, P. (2015). Attractor states. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre and A. Henry (eds) Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning (pp. 20–28). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Hoover, E. (2007). Here’s looking at you, kid: Study says many students are narcissists. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. 53.
• Jiang, Y., & Dewaele, J. M. (2015). What lies bubbling beneath the surface? A longitudinal perspective on fluctuations of ideal and Ought-to L2 self among Chinese learners of English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 53, 331–354.
• Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
• Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Friesen, J., Laurin, K., Zanna, M. P., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to view what is as what should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421–434.
• Kelly, G. J., & Brown, C. (2003). Communicative demands of learning science through technological design: Third grade students’ construction of solar energy devices. Linguistics and Education, 13(4), 483–532.
• Kharkhurin, A.V. (2008). The effect of linguistic proficiency, age of second language acquisition, and length of exposure to a new cultural environment on bilinguals' divergent thinking. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 225–243 doi:10.1017/S1366728908003398
• Kikuchi, K. (2009). Listening to our learners' voices: What demotivates Japanese high school students? Language Teaching Research, 13, 453–471.
• Kikuchi, K. (2015). Demotivation in Second Language Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Kim, S., Levine, T., & Allen, M. (2013). Comparing separate process and intertwined models for reactance. Communication Studies, 64, 273-295. doi:10.1080/10510974.2012.755639
• Kim, K. J. (2009). Demotivating factors in secondary English education. English Teaching, 64(4), 249–267. Larsen-Freeman, D. and Cameron, L. (2008). Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Laurin, K., Kay, A.C., Proudfoot, d., & Fitzsimons, G,J. (2013). Response to restrictive policies: Reconciling system justification and psychological reactance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 122, 152–162.
• Liu, Y., & Thompson, A. S. (2017). Language learning motivation in China: An exploration of the L2MSS and psychological reactance. System 72, 37–48.
• Lombardi, J. V. (2007). The academic success entitlement. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from http://www.insidehighered.com/
• Lyubomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How do simple positive activities increase well-being? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 57–62. doi:10.1177/0963721412469809
• MacIntyre, P.D. & Legatto, J.J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing and idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics 32 (2), 149–171.
• MacIntyre, P.D., & Mercer, S. (2014). Introducing positive psychology to SLA. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 153–172.
• Miron, A. M., & Brehm, J. W. (2006). Reactance theory—40 years later. Social Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie), 37, 9–18.
• Morrow, W. (1994). Entitlement and achievement in education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 13(1), 33–47.
• Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
• Moskovsky, C., Racheva, S., Assulaimani, T., & Harkins, J. (2016). The L2 Motivational Self System and L2 Achievement: A study of Saudi EFL learners. The Modern Language Journal. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1111/modl.12340
• Oxford, R. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
• Quoidbach, J., Mikolajczak, M., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Positive interventions: An emotion regulation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 655–693. doi:10.1037/a0038648
• Rains, S. A. (2013). The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 39, 47-73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x
• Rains, S. A., & Turner, M. M. (2007). Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A test and extension of the intertwined model. Human Communication Research, 33, 241-269. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00298.x
• Resnick, L. B. (1999). Making America smarter. Education Week Century Series, 18(40), 38–40. Rose, J., & Paisley, K. (2012). White privilege in experiential education: A critical reflection. Leisure Sciences, 34, 136–154.
• Rusk, R. D., & Waters, L. (2015). A psycho-social system approach to well-being: Empirically deriving the five domains of positive functioning. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 141–152. doi:10.1080/17439760.2014.920409
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
• Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. New York: Routledge.
• Scott, P.H., Mortimer, E.F., & Aguiar, O.G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Wiley Inter Science, doi: 10.1002/sce.20131
• Sheldon, K., Boehm, J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). Variety is the spice of happiness: The hedonic adaptation prevention (HAP) model. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 901–914). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Thompson, A. S., & Erdil-Moody, Z. (2016). Operationalizing multilingualism: Language learning motivation in Turkey. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(3), 314–331.
• Thompson, A. S., & Vasquez, C. (2015). Exploring motivational profiles through language learning narratives. Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 158–174.
• Trang, T. T. T., & Baldauf, R. B. (2007). Demotivation: Understanding resistance to English language learning the case of Vietnamese students. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(1), 79–105.
• Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled—and more miserable than ever before. New York: Free Press
• Urdan, T., & Mestas, M. (2006). The goals behind performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 354–365.
• Ushioda, E., & Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Beyond Global English: Motivation to Learn Languages in a Multicultural World: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 3. doi: 10.1111/modl.12407
• Van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Reflective discourse: Developing shared understandings in a physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 209–228.
• Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery,A. S.,&Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Re-thinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 529–552.
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1995). Dimensions of children’s motivations for reading: An initial study (Research Rep. No. 34). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center.
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432.
• Wortman, C. B., & Brehm, J. W. (1975). Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 236–277). New York, NY: Academic Press.
• Wyse, D., McCreery, E., & Torrance, H. (2008). The trajectory and impact of national reform: curriculum and assessment in English primary education, Primary Review Research Survey 3/2’, University of Cambridge Faculty of Education, Cambridge.