Iftikhar HUSSAIN, Sajid ABBASI, Sarwat Naz MIRZA, Maqsood ANWAR, Muhammad RAIS, Tariq MAHMOOD

Tree cavities and associated vertebrate fauna in a coniferous forest of Dhirkot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir part of Pakistan

Tree cavities are a globally important structural element of forest ecosystems that host numerous cavity-dwelling vertebrates, but they have received little research in Pakistan. We investigated cavity-bearing trees, the attributes of their cavities, and their associated vertebrate fauna in a coniferous forest of Pakistan. We recorded 1140 trees in a 2-km2 sampled area. We found 211 cavities (64% decay-formed and 36% excavated cavities) in 83 trees (41% live and 59% snags). Of the cavities found, 74% were recorded in trunks and 26% were in branches. Only 28% of the cavities showed signs of recent use by any vertebrate species. We observed 19 vertebrate species using cavities: 2 mammals, 13 birds (including 5 woodpecker species as primary excavators), and 4 reptiles. Height from the ground, entrance diameter, and depth of the cavities used by mammals were greater than those measurements of the cavities occupied by birds and reptiles. Our study shows that tree cavities have a critical role in providing nesting sites to many vertebrate species of Pakistan that require tree cavities in order to breed. We recommend such research be done in other forests of the country to investigate cavity availability and requirements of cavity users. We suggest that certain minimum populations of cavity-bearing trees should be maintained during silviculture practices to support populations of tree-dwelling vertebrates in the coniferous forests of Pakistan.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Key words: Tree hollows, cavity nests, wildlife, temperate pine forest, tropical pine forest, cavity-dwelling vertebrates

Tree cavities and associated vertebrate fauna in a coniferous forest of Dhirkot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir part of Pakistan

Keywords:

Key words: Tree hollows, cavity nests, wildlife, temperate pine forest, tropical pine forest, cavity-dwelling vertebrates,

PDF

___

Adkins MF (2006). A burning issue: using fire to accelerate tree hollow formation in Eucalyptus spp. Aust For 69: 107–113.
Aitken KEH, Martin K (2007). The importance of excavators in holenesting communities: availability and use of natural tree holes in old mixed forests of western Canada. J Ornith 148: S425–S434. Beyer GL, Goldingay RL, Sharpe DJ (2008). The characteristics of squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis) den trees in subtropical Australia. Aus J Zool 56: 13–21.
Blakely TJ, Didham RK (2008). Tree holes in a mixed broad-leaf– podocarp rain forest, New Zealand. New Zeal J Ecol 32: 197– 20
Blakely TJ, Jellyman PG, Holdaway RJ, Young L, Burrows B, Duncan P, Thirkettle D, Simpson J, Ewers RM, Didham RK (2008). The abundance, distribution and structural characteristics of tree holes in Nothofagus forest, New Zealand. Aust Ecol 33: 963–974. Boyle WA, Ganong CN, Clark DB, Hast MA (2008). Density, distribution and attributes of tree cavities in an old growth tropical rain forest. Biotropica 40: 241–245.
Braithwaite LW (1983). Studies on the arboreal marsupial fauna of eucalypt forests being harvested for wood pulp at Eden, New South Wales. I. The species and distribution of animals. Aust Wildl Res 10: 219–229.
Edworthy AB, Weibe KL, Martin K (2012). Survival analysis of a critical resource for cavity-nesting communities: pattern of tree cavity longevity. Ecol Appl 22: 1733–1742.
ERRA (2007). District profile – Bagh. District Reconstruction Unit (DRU) Bagh. Islamabad, Pakistan: Earthquake Reconstruction & Rehabilitation Authority (ERRA).
Gibbons P, Lindenmayer D (2002). Tree Hollows and Wildlife Conservation in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB, Barry SC, Tanton MT (2002). Hollow selection by vertebrate fauna in forests of southeastern Australia and implications for forest management. Biol Conserv 103: 1–12. Gibbs JP, Hunter ML, Melvin SM (1993). Snag availability and community of cavity nesting birds in tropical versus temperate forests. Biotropica 25: 236–241.
Goldingay RL (2009). Characteristics of tree hollows used by Australian birds and bats. Wildl Res 36: 394–409.
Hansell M (2005). Bird Nests and Construction Behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Harper MJ, McCarthy MA, van der Ree R (2005). The abundance of hollow-bearing trees in urban dry sclerophyll forest and the effect of wind on hollow development. Biol Conserv 122: 181–192.
Hooge PN, Stanback MT, Koenig WD (1999). Nest-site selection in the acorn woodpecker. Auk 116: 45–54.
Inions GB, Tanton MT, Davey SM (1989). Effect of fire on the availability of hollows in trees used by the common brushtail possum, Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr, 1792, and the ringtail possum, Pseudocheirus peregrinus Boddaerts, 1785. Aust Wildlife Res 16: 449–458.
Jackson JA, Jackson BJS (2004). Ecological relationships between fungi and woodpecker cavity sites. Condor 106: 37 –49.
Khan MS (2006). Amphibians and Reptiles of Pakistan. Malabar, Florida, USA: Krieger Publishing Company.
Kitching RL (1971). An ecological study of water-filled tree-holes and their position in the woodland ecosystem. J Anim Ecol 40: 281– 30
Koch A, Munks S, Driscoll D (2008). The use of hollow-bearing trees by vertebrate fauna in wet and dry Eucalyptus obliqua forest, Tasmania. Wildl Res 35: 727–746.
Koch AJ (2007). The abundance and types of hollows in Eucalyptus obliqua forest and the use of these hollows by fauna. PhD, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Kunz TH, Lumsden LF (2003). Ecology of cavity and foliage roosting bats. In: Kunz TH, Fenton MB, editors. Bat Ecology. Chicago, Illinois, USA: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3 –89.
Law BS, Anderson J (2000). Roost preference and foraging ranges of the eastern forest bat Vespadelus pumilus under two disturbance histories in northern New South Wales, Australia. Aust Ecol 25: 352–367.
Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham RB, Nix HA, Tanton MT, Smith AP (1991). Predicting the abundance of hollow-bearing trees in montane forests of southeastern Australia. Aust Ecol 16: 91–98.