Taxonomic status of Neomys species (Mammalia: Soricomorpha)and their distribution in Turkey

Taxonomic status of Neomys species (Mammalia: Soricomorpha)and their distribution in Turkey

The genus Neomys is distributed throughout the Palearctic. Neomys teres is widely distributed in the Black Sea region, whereas Neomys anomalus is narrowly distributed in the West Palearctic region. Similarly, in Turkey, Neomys anomalus shows a wide distribution, but Neomys teres is distributed in the Black Sea highlands. These two species can be differentiated from each other morphologically and karyologically. N. anomalus and N. teres are different in terms of penis structure. The karyotypes of Neomys anomalus and Neomys teresare 2n = 52. The karyotype of the Neomys teres population in Turkey is not yet known. Neomys anomalus has adapted to terrestrial habitats while Neomys teres is a semiaquatic species. Neomys teres usually prefers the water s edges, especially small streams and creeks. Terrestrial invertebrates and aquatic invertebrates occur in the diet of both species.

___

  • Arslan A, Zima J (2014). Karyotypes of the mammals of Turkey and neighbouring regions: a review. Folia Zool 63: 1-62.
  • Bannikova AA, Kramerov AD (2005). Molecular phylogeny of Palearctic shrews inferred from RFLP and IS-PCR data. Special Publication of the International Society of Shrew Biologists 1: 87-98.
  • Cabrera A (1907). Fauna Iberica, Mammalia. Madrid, Spain: Museo Nacional de Ciencas Naturales.
  • Castiglia R, Annesi F, Aloise G, Amori G (2007). Mitochondrial DNA reveals different phylogeographic structures in the water shrews Neomys anomalus and N. fodiens (Insectivora: Soricidae) in Europe. J Zool Syst Evol Res 45: 255-262.
  • Chassovnikarova TG, Atanassov NI, Dimitrov AH (2009). Cytogenetic characteristic of the southern water shrew, Neomys anomalus (Insectivora: Soricidae), in the Strandzha Mountains (Southeast Bulgaria). Folia Zool 58: 416-419.
  • Churchfield S (1990). The Natural History of Shrews. Bodwin, UK: Christopher Helm.Churchfield S, Rychlik L, Yavrouyan E, Turlejski K (2006). First results on the feeding ecology of the Transcaucasian water shrew Neomys teres (Soricomorpha: Soricidae) from Armenia. Can J Zool 84: 1853-1858.
  • Corbet GB (1978). The Mammals of the Palaearctic Region: A Taxonomic Review. London, UK: British Museum.
  • Corbet GB, Hill JE (1991). A World List of Mammalian Species. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.
  • Ellerman J, Morrison-Scott T (1951). Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals, 1758 to 1946. 2nd ed. London, UK: British Museum.
  • Fredga K, Levan A (1969). The chromosomes of the European water shrew (Neomys fodiens). Hereditas 62: 348-356.
  • Hutterer R (2005). Order Soricomorpha. In: Wilson DE, Reeder DM, editors. Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 220-311.
  • Ivanitskaya E (1989). Constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolar organizer regions in karyotypes of some shrews (Soricidae, Insectivora). Genetika 25: 1188-1198 (in Russian with English summary).
  • Jimenez R, Burgos M, Diaz de la Guardia R (1984). Meiotic behavior of sex chromosomes and polymeiosis in three species of insectivores. Genetica65: 187-192.
  • Kahmann H, Çağlar M (1960). Türkiyede memeli hayvanlar araştırma sahasında yeni buluşlar. Türk Biyoloji Dergisi 10: 119-126 (in Turkish).
  • Kryštufek B, Davison A, Griffiths HI (2000). Evolution art biogeography of water shrew (Neomys spp.) in the western Palaearctic region. Can J Zool 78: 1616-1625.
  • Kryštufek B, Tvrtković N (1988). Insectivores and rodents of the Central Dinaric Karst of Yugoslavia. Scopolia 15: 1-59.
  • Kryštufek B, Vohralík V (2001). Mammals of Turkey and Cyprus, Introduction, Checklist, Insectivora. Sofia, Bulgaria: Pensoft.
  • Kryštufek B, Vohralík V, Kurtonur C (1998). A new look at the identity and distribution of water shrews (Neomys spp.) in Turkey. Z Säugetierkd 63: 129-136.
  • Meylan A (1966). Donneés nouvelles sur les chromosomes des insectivores Europeéns (Mamm.). Rev Suisse Zool 73: 548-558 (in French).
  • Miller GS (1908). Two new mammals from Asia Minor. Ann Mag Hist 8: 68-70.
  • Niethammer J, Krapp F (1990). Handbuch der Sägetiere Europas. Wiesbaden, Germany: Aula-Verlag (in German).
  • Obuch J (1994). On the food of the eagle-owl (Bubo bubo) and tawny owl (Strix aluco) in the eastern part of Turkey. Tichodroma 7: 7-16.
  • Osborn DJ (1965). Notes on the moles of Turkey. J Mamm 45: 127-129.
  • Rimsa D, Zivkovic S, Petrov B (1978). The results of cytogenetical study of shrews (Soricidae, Insectivora, Mammalia) in Yugoslavia. Biosystematika 4: 209-215.
  • Pucek Z (1964). The structure of the glans penis in Neomys Kaupp 1929 as taxonomic character. Acta Theriol 9: 374-377.
  • Sokolov VE, Tembotov AK (1989). Mlekopitayushchie Kavkaza: Nasekomoyadnye. Pozvonochnye Kavkaza. Moscow, Russia: Nauka (in Russian).
  • Spitzenberger F (1968). Zur Verbreitung und Systematik türkischer Soricinae (Insectivora, Mammalia). Ann Naturhistor Mus Wien 72: 273-289 (in German).
  • Spitzenberger F, Steiner H (1962). Über Insektenfresser (Insecticora) und Wühlmäuse (Microtinae) der nordosttürkischen Feuchtwaelder. Bonn Zool Beitr 13: 284-309 (in German).
  • Strait SG, Smith CS (2006). Elemental analysis of soricine enamel: pigmentation variation and distribution in molars of Blarina brevıcauda. J Mammal 87: 700-705.
  • Tez C, İbiş O, Özcan S, Gündüz İ, Kılıç M, Telcioğlu M (2010). NeomysKaup, 1829 ve SorexLinnaeus, 1758 (Soricidae: Soricomorpha: Mammalia)’in allozim var yasyonları ve yeni yayılış yerleri. In: XX. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi; 21-25 June 2010; Denizli, Turkey, pp. 21-25 (in Turkish).
  • Wilson DE, Reeder MD (1993). Mammal Species of the World. 2nd ed. Washington, DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
  • Wilson DE, Reeder DM (2005). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Wolsan M, Hutterer R (1998). A list of the living species of shrew. In: Wojcik JM, Wolsan M, editors. Evolution of Shrews. Bialowieza, Poland: Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Science, pp. 425-448.
  • Yudin B (1970). Obzor vidov roda Neomys Kaup (Soricidae, Insectivora). In: Tscherepanov AI, editor. Fauna Sibiri. Novosibirsk, Russia: Nauka, pp. 247-251 (in Russian).
  • Zaitsev MV (1999). Sistematika i diaghnostika kutor (rod Neomys) Evrazii. In: Biologhiya Nasekomoyadnykh Mlekopitayushchikh. Kemerovo, Russia: Kuzbassvuzizdat, pp. 24-25 (in Russian).
  • Zima J (1984). Chromosomes of certain small mammals from Southern Bohemia and the Šumava Mts (ČSSR). Folia Zool 33: 133-141.
  • Zima J, Lukáčová L, Macholán M (1998). Chromosomal evolution of shrews. In: Wójcik JM, Wolsan M, editors. Evolution of Shrews. Bialowieza, Poland: Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Science, pp. 175-218.