Passer hispaniolensis subpopulations in Turkey: allozyme variations and brief ecobiological notes

In this study, Spanish Sparrows were recorded in numerous locations and specimens were collected from Samsun, Çorum, and Denizli provinces in Turkey. The breeding subpopulations preferred various nesting sites, including wooded areas and White Stork nests. These sparrows were primarily observed in flocks of variable size and were rarely solitary. The largest flock recorded was found in juniper and pine woods in Denizli. We collected data on 23 allozyme loci to compare the genetic variation among the 3 Spanish Sparrow subpopulations. The low FST (0.1363) and high Nm (1.5842) values calculated from these data indicated that gene flow among the 3 subpopulations was high and that these subpopulations did not show substantial genetic isolation. The genetic distance (D) between Çorum and Denizli was particularly low (0.001), and these subpopulations showed the highest level of genetic similarity found in the study. Conversely, a high genetic distance (0.028) was found between Denizli and Samsun. The genetic structure of these subpopulations also demonstrated a low level of heterozygosity in the total population.

Passer hispaniolensis subpopulations in Turkey: allozyme variations and brief ecobiological notes

In this study, Spanish Sparrows were recorded in numerous locations and specimens were collected from Samsun, Çorum, and Denizli provinces in Turkey. The breeding subpopulations preferred various nesting sites, including wooded areas and White Stork nests. These sparrows were primarily observed in flocks of variable size and were rarely solitary. The largest flock recorded was found in juniper and pine woods in Denizli. We collected data on 23 allozyme loci to compare the genetic variation among the 3 Spanish Sparrow subpopulations. The low FST (0.1363) and high Nm (1.5842) values calculated from these data indicated that gene flow among the 3 subpopulations was high and that these subpopulations did not show substantial genetic isolation. The genetic distance (D) between Çorum and Denizli was particularly low (0.001), and these subpopulations showed the highest level of genetic similarity found in the study. Conversely, a high genetic distance (0.028) was found between Denizli and Samsun. The genetic structure of these subpopulations also demonstrated a low level of heterozygosity in the total population.

___

  • Aebersold PB, Winans GA, Teel DJ, Milner GB, Utter FM (1987). Manual for Starch Gel Electrophoresis: A Method for the Detection of Genetic Variation. U.S. Department of Commerce. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Report: 61. Springfield, VA, USA: National Marine Fisheries Service.
  • Alonso JC (1984). Estudio comparado de los principales parametros reproductivos de Passer hispaniolensis y Passer domesticus en España centro-occidental. Ardeola 30: 3–21 (article in Spanish).
  • Anderson TR (2006). Biology of the Ubiquitous House Sparrow: From Genes to Populations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Aslan A, Kiziroğlu İ (2003). A study on the ornithofauna of Sakaryabaşı/
  • Eminekin Pond and its vicinity. Turk J Zool 27: 19–26. Baker MC, Johnson MS (1998). Allozymic and morphometric comparisons among indigo and lazuli buntings and their hybrids. Auk 115: 537–542.
  • Barış S, Akçakaya R, Bilgin C (1984). The Birds of Kızılcahamam. Heidelberg, Germany: OSME.
  • Barrowclough GF (1980). Gene flow, effective population sizes and genetic variance components in birds. Evolution 34: 789–798.
  • Barrowclough GF (1983). Biochemical studies of microevolutionary processes. In: Brush AH, Clark GA Jr, editors. Perspectives in Ornithology. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 223– 2
  • Bates JM (2000). Allozymic genetic structure and natural habitat fragmentation: data for five species of Amazonian forest birds. Condor 102: 770–783.
  • Bocheński M (2005). Nesting of the sparrows Passer spp. in the white stork Ciconia ciconia nests in a stork colony in Kłopot (W Poland). Intern Stud Sparrows 30: 39–41.
  • Bush FM (1967). Developmental and populational variation in electrophoretic properties of dehydrogenases, hydrolases, and other blood proteins of the house sparrow, Passer domesticus. Comp Biochem Physiol 22: 273–287.
  • Bush FM, Fraser WW (1969). Dissociation–reassociation of lactate dehydrogenase: reversed isozyme migration and kinetic properties. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 131: 13–15.
  • Corbin KW (1983). Genetic structure and avian systematics. In: Johnston RF, editor. Current Ornithology. Vol 1. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 211–244.
  • Dijksen LJ, Kasparek M (1985). The Birds of the Kızılırmak Delta. Heidelberg, Germany: OSME.
  • Dijksen LJ, Kasparek M (1988). The Birds of Lake Acı. Heidelberg, Germany: OSME.
  • Erdoğdu E (2001). A study on the ornithofauna of Doğancı Pond in Alpu-Eskişehir. Turk J Zool 25: 105–109.
  • Ertan KT (1996). The Birds of Kocaçay Delta. Heidelberg, Germany: OSME.
  • Evans PGH (1987). Electrophoretic variability of gene products. In: Cooke F, Buckley PA, editors. Avian Genetics: A Population and Ecological Approach. London: Academic Press, pp. 105– 1
  • Harris H, Hopkinson DA (1976). Handbook of Enzyme Electrophoresis in Human Genetics. New York: Elsevier.
  • Heinzel H, Fitter R, Parslow J (1995). Birds of Britain and Europe. London: Collins.
  • Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, editors. (1996). Molecular Systematics. 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Husband C, Kasparek M (1984). The Birds of Lake Seyfe. Heidelberg, Germany: OSME.
  • Jetz W (1995). The Birds of Uludağ. Heidelberg, Germany: OSME.
  • Karakaş R, Kılıç A (2004). The birds of Dicle Dam (Diyarbakır). Turk J Zool 28: 301–308.
  • Kasparek M (1987). The Birds of Lake Kulu. Heidelberg, Germany: OSME.
  • Kaya M, Kurtonur C (2003). Gala Gölü ve çevresinin (Edirne) ornitho-faunası üzerine araştırmalar. Trakya Univ J Sci 4: 169– 179 (article in Turkish with English abstract).
  • Kaya M, Yurtsever S, Kurtonur C (1999). Trakya ornito-faunası üzerine araştırmalar. Turk J Zool 23: 781–790 (article in Turkish with English abstract).
  • Kılıç A, Kasparek M (1987). The Birds of Yeniçağa Gölü. Heidelberg, Germany: OSME.
  • Kılıç A, Kasparek M (1989). The Birds of the Köyceğiz–Dalyan Area. Heidelberg, Germany: OSME.
  • Kıraç SK (1993). The Birds of Çöl Lake, Uyuz Lake and Yağlıören Pool. Heidelberg, Germany: OSME.
  • Kirwan G (1993). The Birds of the Hotamış Marshes. Heidelberg, Germany: OSME.
  • Kirwan G (1999). A Birding Trip Report, June 9–29, 1999. Victoria, TX, USA: Ornifolk.
  • Kosicki JZ, Sparks TH, Tryjanowski P (2007). House sparrows benefit from the conservation of white storks. Naturwissenschaften 94: 412–415.
  • Manchenko GP (2003). Handbook of Detection of Enzymes on Electrophoretic Gels. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. Marques PM, Boieiro M, Canário M, Vicente L (2003). Variation of nestling diet across the breeding season in Spanish Sparrow Passer hispaniolensis in southern Portugal. Ardeola 51: 71–75.
  • May B. (1998). Starch gel electrophoresis of allozymes. In: Hoelzel AR, editor. Molecular Genetic Analysis of Populations: A Practical Approach, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Metzmacher M (1990). Climatic factors, activity budgets, and breeding success of the Spanish sparrow [Passer hispaniolensis (Temm.)]. In: Pinowski J, Summers-Smith JD, editors. Granivorous Birds in the Agricultural Landscape. Warsaw, Poland: Polish Scientific Publishers, pp. 151–168.
  • Mullarney K, Svensson L, Zetterström D, Grant PJ (2004). Birds of Europe. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
  • Nei M (1978). Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583–590.
  • Nergiz H, Tabur MA (2007). The ornithofauna of Lake Karakuyu (Afyonkarahisar, Turkey). Turk J Zool 31: 309–315.
  • Ohta N, Kajita M, Kusuhara S, Kakizawa R (2000). Genetic differentiation and phylogenetic relationships among species of Gallus (jungle fowl) and the chicken. J Poult Sci 37: 33–39.
  • Parkin DT (1988). Genetic variation in the House Sparrow (Passer domesticus). In: Ouellet H, editor. Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici 2: 1652–1657.
  • Perktaş U, Ayaş Z (2005). Birds of Nallıhan Bird Paradise (central Anatolia, Turkey). Turk J Zool 29: 45–59.
  • Roselaar CS (1995). Songbirds of Turkey: An Atlas of Biodiversity of Turkish Passerine Birds: Taxonomy, Morphology, and Distribution. Robertsbridge, UK: Pica Press.
  • Saag P, Paaver T, Väli Ü (2007). Lack of between- and within-species isoenzyme variability in Aquila eagles (Aves: Accipitriformes). Biochem Syst Ecol 35: 774–776.
  • Sacarrão GF, Soares AA (1975). Algumas observações sobre a biologia de Passer hispaniolensis (Temm.) em Portugal. Estudos sobre a Fauna Portuguesa 8: 1–14 (article in Portuguese).
  • Shaw RC, Prasad R (1970). Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes: a compilation of recipes. Biochem Genet 4: 297–320.
  • Snow D, Perrins CM (1998). The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. 2: Passerines. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Summers-Smith JD (1988). The Sparrows: A Study of the Genus Passer. Calton, UK: Poyser.
  • Swofford DL, Selander RB (1989). BIOSYS-1: A Computer Program for Analysis of Allelic Variation in Population Genetics and Biochemical Statistics. Champaign, IL, USA: Illinois Natural History Survey.
  • Tobolka M (2011). Roosting of tree sparrow (Passer montanus) and house sparrow (Passer domesticus) in white stork (Ciconia ciconia) nests during winter. Turk J Zool 35: 879–882.
  • Tryjanowski P, Sparks TH, Jerzak L (2006). House Sparrow Passer domesticus, Starling Sturnus vulgaris, Tree Sparrow Passer montanus, and Other Residents of the White Stork Ciconia ciconia. Poznań, Poland: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
  • Van Wyk E, Van der Bank H, Verdoorn GH (2001). Allozyme variation in four populations of African whitebacked vultures (Gyps africanus) and phylogenetic relationships between four vulture species from southern Africa. Biochem Syst Ecol 29: 485–512.
  • Verimli R, Yiğit N, Çolak E, Sözen M (2000). Nonspecific esterase patterns of Rattus norvegicus. Turk J Biol 24: 825–831.
  • Wright S (1951). The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugenic 15: 323–354.
  • Wright S (1965). The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395–420.
Turkish Journal of Zoology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0179
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Morphological variation among populations of Mesalina watsonana (Stoliczka, 1872) (Sauria: Lacertidae) in Iran

Seyyed Saeed Hosseinian YOUSEFKHANI, Nasrullah RASTEGAR-POUYANI, Eskandar RASTEGAR-POUYANI

Using digital images in the study of fluctuating asymmetry in the spur-thighed tortoise Testudo graeca

Gabriel BUICA, Dan COGALNICEANU

Bilal DİK, Ali HALAJIAN, Martin TURNER

Abundance and distribution of eggs and larvae of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus, Linnaeus, 1758) and horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus, Steindachner, 1868) on the coasts of the eastern Black Sea

Cemalettin ŞAHİN, Necati HACIMURTAZAOĞLU

Sanjabihari SUKHAM, Brajakishor CHINGAKHAM, Labee THOIDINGJAM, Gusheinzed WAIKHOM

Comparison of geographic variations in Typhlops vermicularis (Merrem, 1820) (Ophidia: Typhlopidae) from the Iranian plateau with Turkey and Turkmenistan

Mohadeseh AFROOSHEH, Nasrullah RASTEGAR-POUYANI, Seyed Kamran GHOREISHI, Haji Gholi KAMI

Nematode and acanthocephalan parasites of marine fish of the eastern Black Sea coasts of Turkey

Yahya TEPE, Mehmet Cemal OĞUZ

Passer hispaniolensis subpopulations in Turkey: allozyme variations and brief ecobiological notes

Fulya SAYGILI, Nuri YİĞİT

Two new species and 2 first records of the genus Lepidostoma Rambur, 1842 (Trichoptera: Lepidostomatidae) from the Indian Himalayas

Sajad Hussain PAREY, Malkiat Singh SAINI

Zerconella (Zerconella) balkanica sp. nov., a new species of Zerconidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) from central Albania

Zsolt UJVÁRI