Mesocricetus brandti Nehring, 1898 ve Mesocricetus auratus (Waterhouse, 1839) (Mammalia: Rodentia)’da Allozim Varyasyonlar› ve Genetik Farkl›l›klar

Anadolu ve ‹ran’da yay›l›fl gösteren Mesocricetus brandti ve Mesocricetus auratus türlerinin 5 populasyonunun allozim varyasyonu 20 gen lokusunun elektroforetik analiziyle incelenmifltir. Analiz edilen 20 gen lokusundan 11’i monomorfiktir ve bütün populasyonlarda ayn› allelde fikse olmufltur. 9 lokus polimorfiktir ve tek bir lokus M. auratus ve M. brandti populasyonlar› aras›nda de¤iflkenlik göstermifltir. Bütün populasyonlar için ortalama polimorfik lokus yüzdesi 24,7 ve 5,9 ile 41,2 aras›nda de¤iflmektedir. Fiksasyon indeksinin ortalama de¤eri FST = 0,0748 olup M. brandti populasyonlar›nda % 7 genetik farkl›l›k göstermektedir. Bu FST de¤eri orta derece genetik farkl›l›¤› göstermektedir. FST’den hesaplanan göç say›s› (Nm = 3,09) de¤eri etkili gen ak›fl›n›n oldu¤unu önermektedir. Bütün populasyonlar için (M. brandti ve M. auratus) ortalama heterozigotluk (gözlenen= Ho) 0,069’d›r ve 0,029 ile 0,118 aras›nda de¤iflmektedir. M. brandtii ve M. auratus’un ortalama Ho de¤erleri s›ras›yla Ho = 0,080 ve Ho = 0,029 olarak saptanm›flt›r. M. brandti populasyonlar› aras›nda Nei’nin genetik mesafesi D = 0,006 den D = 0,026’ya kadar de¤iflmektedir. Nei’nin genetik mesafesi iki tür aras›nada D = 0,102’den 0,122’e kadar de¤iflkenlik göstermektedir. 

Allozyme Variations and Genetic Differentiation in Mesocricetus brandti Nehring, 1898 and Mesocricetus auratus (Waterhouse, 1839) (Mammalia: Rodentia)

Allozyme variations were investigated by the electrophoretic analysis of 20 gene loci in 5 populations of Mesocricetus brandti and Mesocricetus auratus from Anatolia and Iran. Of the 20 loci analysed, 11 were monomorphic and fixed for the same allele in all 5 populations, 9 loci were polymorphic, and 1 locus differed between M. auratus and M. brandti populations. The overall mean of polymorphic loci for all the populations was 24.7% (range: 5.9%-41.2%). The mean fixation index value was FST = 0.0748, indicating a 7% genetic variation in the M. brandti populations. The obtained FST values indicated that there are moderate genetic differences between the populations of M. brandti. The finding that the number of migrants (Nm) was 3.09 also suggests effective gene flow across populations. The overall mean heterozygosity (Ho = direct count) for all populations (M. brandti and M. auratus) was 0.069 (range: 0.029-0.118 at different locations). The mean heterozygosity of M. brandti and M. auratus was Ho = 0.080 and Ho = 0,029, respectively. Nei's measure of genetic distance varied from D = 0.006 to D = 0.026 between populations of M. brandti. Nei's distances varied from D = 0.102 to D = 0.122 between M. auratus and M. brandti populations.

___

  • Black VI, W.C. 1997. BIOSYS-2. A Computer Program for the Analysis of Allelic Variation in Genetics. Colorado State University: Ft. Collins, CO.
  • Csaikl, F. 1984. Electrophoretic comparison of Syrian and Chinese hamster species. Heredity, 52: 141-144.
  • Doğramacı, S., Kefelioğlu, H. and Gündüz, İ. 1994. Karyological analysis of Anatolian Mesocricetus (Mammalia: Rodentia) species. Tr. J. of Zoology. 18: 41-46.
  • Haldane, J.B.S. 1954. A test for randomness of mating. Journal of Genetics, 52: 631-635.
  • Harris, H. and Hopkinson, D.A. 1976. Handbook of Enzyme Electrophoresis in Human Genetics. American Elsevier, New York.
  • Kartavtsev Y.P., Kartavtseva I. V. And Vorontsov, N.N. 1984. Population genetics and genogeography of wild mammals. IV. The level of heterozygosity of five species of Palaearctic hamsters (Mammalia, Cricetinae). Genetika, 20: 954-960.
  • Levene, H. 1949. On a matching problem arising in genetics. Annals of Mathematics and Statistics, 20: 91-94.
  • Nehring, A., 1898. Über Cricetus, Cricetulus und Mesocricetus n. Subg. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 21: 493-495.
  • Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583- 590.
  • Nei, M. and Chesser, R.K. 1983. Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann. Human Genet. 47: 253-259.
  • Neuhäuser, G. 1936. Die Muriden von Kleinasien. Zeit. Saugetierk., volume: 11: 161-236.
  • Neumann, K., Michaux, J., Lebedev, V., Yigit, N., Colak, E., Ivanova, N., Poltoraus, A., Surov, A., Markov, G., Maak, S., Neumann, S. and Gattermann, R. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of the Cricetinae subfamily based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b and 12SrRNA genes and the nuclear vWF gene. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 39: 135-148.
  • Nevo, E. 1978. Genetic variation in natural populations: patterns and theory. Theor. Pop. Biol. 13: 121-177.
  • Osborn, D.L. 1965. Rodents of subfamilies Murinae, Gerbillinae and Cricetinae from Turkey. J. Egyptian Publ. Health Ass. 40: 401- 421.
  • Rohlf, F. J. 2000. NTSYS – pc, version 2.1. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Exeter Publishing, New York.
  • Shaw, R.C and Prasad, R. 1970. Starch Gel Electrophoresis of Enzymes - A Compilation of Recipes. Biochemical Genetics. 4: 297-320.
  • Slatkin, M. and Barton, N. 1989. A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average level of gene flow. Evolution, 43: 1349-1368.
  • Sokal, R.R. and Sneath, P.H.A. 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
  • Spitzenberger, F. 1972. Der Hamster Mesocricetus brandti (Nehring, 1898) in Zentralanatolien. Z. Säugetierk. 37: 229-231.
  • Steiner, H. and Vauk, G. 1966. Säugetiere aus dem Beyflehir Gebiet (Vilayet Konya, Kleinasien). Zool. Anz. 176: 97-102.
  • Swofford, D.L. and Selander, R.B. 1989. BIOSYS-1. A Computer Program for the Analysis of Allelic Variation in Population Genetics and Biochemical Systematics. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
  • Weir, B.S. and Cockerham, C.C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38: 1358-1370.
  • Wilson, D.E. and Reeder, D.M. 1993. Mammal species of the world. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, USA.
  • Wright, S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics, 15, 323-354.
  • Wright, S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F- statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution, 19, 395-420.
  • Wright, S. 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 4. Variability Within and Among Natural Populations.. University of Chicago, Chicago.
  • Verimli, R., Yiğit, N., Çolak, E., Sözen, M. and Özkurt, fi. 2000. Blood serums proteins of the genus Mesocricetus Nehring, 1898 (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. Turk. J. Biol. 24: 855-858.
  • Yiğit, N., Çolak, E., Kıvanç, E. and Sözen, M. 1997. A study on reproduction biology of Mesocricetus brandti (Nehring, 1898) (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. Tr. J. of Zoology. 21: 343-348.
  • Yiğit, N., Çolak, E., Sözen, M., Özkurt, fi. and Verimli, R. 2000. The distribution, morphology, and karyology of the genus Mesocricetus (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. Folia Zool. 49: 167-174.
Turkish Journal of Zoology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0179
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Efficacy of the Rodenticide Bromethalin in the Control of Microtus arvalis and Nesokia indica in Alfalfa Fields

Alireza KHALIL ARIA, Mohsen MOROVATI, Mehdi NASERI

Limnoleria longiseta Motaş, 1928 and Sperchon rostratus Lundblad, 1969: Two water mite species (Acari, Hydrachnidia)

Yunus Ömer BOYACI

Türkiye'de yayılış yapan Microtus rossiaemeridionalis Ognev, 1924 (Mammalia: Rodentia)'in üreme biyolojisi ve doğum sonrası gelişimi

Tolga KANKILIÇ, Ercüment ÇOLAK, Nuri YİĞİT

Otiorynchus lederi Stierlin (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): A New Record and a New Pest in Turkey

Hikmet ÖZBEK, Levent GÜLTEKİN, Genrick DAVIDIAN

Contributions to the Knowledge of the Oligochaeta (Annelida) Fauna of Some Lakes in the Taurus Mountain Range (Turkey)

Seray YILDIZ, M. Ruşen USTAOĞLU, Süleyman BALIK

Köprüköy (Kızılırmak, Türkiye) Civarındaki Delichon urbica (Linnaeus, 1758) (Aves: Passeriformes)’n›n Yuvalanma ve Üreme Biyolojisi Üzerine Notlar

Fulya SAYGILI, Nuri YİĞİT

Türkiye’den iki Su Kenesi Türü, Limnolegeria longiseta Motafl, 1928 ve Sperchon rostratus Lundblad, 1969 (Acari, Hydrachnidia)

Yunus Ömer BOYACI

Rana holtzi ve Rana macrocnemis'in yeni populasyonları hakkında

Kurtuluş OLGUN, Aziz AVCI, Yusuf KUMLUTAŞ, Çetin ILGAZ, Fatma İRET, İbrahim BARAN

Yayla Gölü (Denizli, Türkiye) Bataklık Kurbağası (Rana ridibunda Pallas, 1771) Populasyonunun Büyüklüğü

Dinçer AYAZ, Cemal Varol TOK, Ahmet MERMER

Gözle görülebilir fluorescent elastomer (VIE) markalamanın tatlı su İstakozu'nun, Procambarus acutus acutus (Girard, 1852), büyüme, kabuk değişimi ve yaşama oranı üzerine etkisi

Yavuz MAZLUM