Importance of moss habitats for mesostigmatid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) in Romania

Importance of moss habitats for mesostigmatid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) in Romania

This study aimed to characterize the composition of soil mite populations (Acari: Mesostigmata) from 3 moss habitats (rockmoss, bark moss, and soil moss). In total, 15 natural forest ecosystems were analyzed (3 deciduous forests, 5 beech forests, 1 fir forest,5 spruce forests, and 1 mixed forest), from 8 counties in Romania. A total of 240 soil samples, 97 species, and 3018 individuals wereanalyzed. The samples were taken from April 2012 until October 2013. The highest numerical abundance and species diversity wasfound in the soil moss, in comparison with bark moss, where the lowest values were recorded. Using statistical analysis, we found asignificant effect of habitat type on abundance and species richness, with mite communities grouped into 3 distinct classes. If we take intoconsideration the high diversity values and the presence of characteristic species (53.59% from the total number of mites from Romania),we conclude that these moss habitats, situated in natural undisturbed forests, are very important from a conservation point of view.

___

  • Ács A, Kontschan J (2014). Contribution to the Macrochelidae Vitzthum, 1930 fauna of the Carpathian Basin and the Balkan Peninsula (Acari: Mesostigmata). Opuscula Zoologica Budapest 45: 109-118.
  • Ács A, Kontschan J (2015). Contribution to the Veigaiidae Oudemans, 1939 fauna of the Carpathian Basin and the Balkan Peninsula (Acari: Mesostigmata). Opuscula Zoologica Budapest 46: 121- 131.
  • Arroyo J, Kenny J, Bolger T (2012). A survey of the Oribatida and Mesostigmata (Acarina) of Irish forests. Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society 36: 33-59.
  • Arroyo J, Moraza ML, Bolger T (2010). The mesostigmatid mite (Acari, Mesostigmata) community in canopies of Sitka spruce forests in Ireland and a comparison with ground moss habitats. Graellsia 66: 29-37.
  • Arroyo J, Keith AM, Schmidt O, Bolger T (2013). Mite abundance and richness in an Irish survey of soil biodiversity with comments on some newly recorded species. Irish Naturalists’ Journal 33: 19-27.
  • Arroyo J, Kenny J, Bolger T (2013). Variation between mite communities in Irish forest types importance of bark and moss cover in canopy. Pedobiologia 56: 241-250.
  • Aspetti GP, Boccelli R, Ampollini D, Del Re AAM, Capri E (2010). Assessment of soil-quality index based on microarthropods in corn cultivation in Northern Italy. Ecol Indic 10: 129-135.
  • Balogh J (1972). The Oribatid Genera of the World. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
  • Bajerlein D, Błoszyk J, Gwiazdowicz D, Ptaszyk J, Halliday B (2006). Community structure and dispersal of mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) in nests of the white stork (Ciconia ciconia). Biologia 61: 525-530.
  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014). lme4: linear mixedeffects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Versions 1.1–7. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project. org/package=lme4. Accessed 30 February 2017.
  • Bloszyk J, Bajerlein D, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Halliday RB, Dylewska M (2006). Uropodine mite communities (Acari: Mesostigmata) in birds’ nests in Poland. Belg J Zool 136: 145-153.
  • Bolger T, Arroyo J, Kenny J, Caplice M (2014). Hierarchical analysis of mite community structures in Irish forests: a study of the relative contribution of location, forest type, and microhabitat. Appl Soil Ecol 83: 39-43.
  • Botnariuc N, Vădineanu A (1982). Ecologie [Ecology]. Bucureşti: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică (in Romanian).
  • Călugăr A, Huţu M (2008). Fauna de gamaside edifice (Acari: Gamasida Leach, 1815). In: Chifu T, Manoliu A, Toma C, editors. Parcul Naţional Călimani. Studii ecologice şi de biodiversitate. Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Editura Alma Mater, pp. 238-247 (in Romanian).
  • Cragg RG, Bardgett RD (2001). How changes in soil faunal diversity and composition within trophic group influence decomposition processes. Soil Biol Biochem 33: 2073-2081.
  • Dirilgen T, Arroyo J, Dimmers WJ, Faber J, Stone D, Martins da Silva P, Carvalho F, Schmelz R, Griffiths BS, Francisco R, Creamer RE, Sousa JP, Bolger T (2016). Mite community composition across a European transect and its relationships to variation in other components of soil biodiversity. Appl Soil Ecol 97: 86-97.
  • Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araújo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Daniel Kissling W (2007). Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30: 609-628.
  • Garcia-Palacios P, Fernando T, Maestre FT, Kattge J, Wall DH (2013). Climate and litter quality differently modulate the effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition across biomes. Ecol Lett 16: 1045-1053.
  • Ghilyarov MS, Bregetova NG (1977). Opredeliteľ obitayushchikh v pochve kleshcheĭ (Mesostigmata. Petrograd, Russia: Zoological Institute of the Academy of Sciences.
  • Gwiazdowicz DJ, Klemt J (2004). Mesostigmatic mites (Acari, Gamasida) in selected microhabitats of the Biebrza National Park (NE Poland). Biol Letters 41: 11-19.
  • Gwiazdowicz DJ, Kmita M (2004). Mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) from selected microhabitats of the „Ujście Warty” National Park. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Silvarum Colendarum Ratio et Industria Lignaria 3: 49-55.
  • Gwiazdowicz DJ (2007). Ascid Mites (Acari, Gamasina) from Selected Forest Ecosystems and Microhabitats in Poland. Poznań, Poland: University Augusta Cieszkowskiego.
  • Gwiazdowicz DJ, Kamczyc J, Teodorowicz E, Błoszyk J (2012). Mite communities (Acari, Mesostigmata) associated with Ips typographus (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in managed and natural Norway spruce stands in Central Europe. Cent Eur J Biol 7: 910-916.
  • Gwiazdowicz JD, Kamczyc J, Rakowski R (2011). Mesostigmatid mites in four classes of wood decay. Exp Appl Acarol 55: 155- 165.
  • Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001). PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4: 1-9.
  • Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical J 50: 346-363.
  • Hoyle M, Gilbert F (2004). Species richness of moss landscapes unaffected by short-term fragmentation. Oikos 105: 359-367.
  • Huhta V, Siira-Pietikäinen A, Penttinen R (2012). Importance of dead wood for soil mite (Acarina) communities in boreal oldgrowth forests. Soil Organisms 84: 499-512.
  • Hyatt KH (1980). Mites of the subfamily Parasitinae (Mesostigmata: Parasitidae) in the British Isles. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology 38: 237-378.
  • Kalȕz S, Fenďa P (2005). Mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) of the Family Ascidae of Slovakia. Bratislava, Slovakia: Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Science.
  • Kaczmarek S, Marquardt T, Falenczyk-Kozirog K (2011). Diversity of the Mesostigmata (Acari) in tree-hollows of selected deciduous tree species. Biol Letters 48: 29-37.
  • Kamczyc J, Skorupski M (2014). Mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) from rock cracks and crevices in rock labyrinths in the Sto³owe Mountains National Park (SW Poland). Biol Letters 51: 55-62.
  • Kamczyc J, Gwiazdowicz JD (2013). The diversity of soil mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) in yellow ant (Lasius flavus) nests along a gradient of land use. Biologia 68: 314-318.
  • Karg W (1993). Acari (Acarina), Milben Parasitiformes (Anactinochaeta). Cohors Gamasina Leach. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands 59: 1-513.
  • Kontschan J (2003). Uropodina (Acari: Mesostigmata) fauna of Aggteleki National Park (NE Hungary). Folia Historico Naturalia Musei Matraensis 27: 53-57.
  • Krantz GW, Walter DE (2009). A Manual of Acarology. Third edition. Lubbock, TX, USA: Texas Tech University Press.
  • Krawczyk AJ, Augustiničová G, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Konwerski S, Kucharczyk H, Olejniczak I, Rutkowski T, Skubała P, Solarz K, Zdrojewska Z, Tryjanowsk P (2015). Nests of the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) as habitat for invertebrates. Biologia 70: 1637-1647.
  • Kethley JB (1990). Acarina: Prostigmata (Actinedida). In: Dindal DL, editor. Soil Biology Guide. Brisbane, Australia: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 667-756.
  • Kindt R (2014). BiodiversityR: GUI for biodiversity, suitability and community ecology analysis. Available from: https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/BiodiversityR/BiodiversityR. Madej G, Barczyk G, Gawenda I (2011). Importance of microhabitats for preservation of species diversity, on the basis of mesostigmatid mites (Mesostigmata, Arachnida, Acari). Pol J Environ Stud 20: 961-968.
  • Manu M (2011). Influence of the cliff microclimate on the population ecology of soil predatory mites (Acari: Mesostigmata - Gamasina) from Romania. In: Atanasov A, editor. Proceedings of the Third International Conference “Research People and Actual Tasks on Multidisciplinary Sciences”, Lozenec, Bulgaria, Bulgarian National Multidisciplinary Scientific Network of the Professional Society for Research Work 3: 1-6.
  • Manu M (2012). The similarities between predator mite populations (Acari: Gamasina) from some natural forests in Bucegi Massif, Romania. Biologia 67: 390-396.
  • Manu M, Băncilă RI, Onete M (2013). Soil mite communities (Acari: Gamasina) from different ecosystem types from Romania. Belg J Zool 143: 30-41.
  • Manu M, Ion S (2014). Characterisic soil mite communities (Acari: Gamasina) for some natural forests from Bucegi Natural Park, Romania. Period Biol 116: 93-101.
  • Manu M, Onete M (2015). Diversity of soil mite fauna (Acari: Mesostigmata) from some cliff ecosystems – Romania. Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenia. St şi com Şt Nat 31: 95-100.
  • Mašán P (2003a). Macrochelid Mites of Slovakia (Acari, Mesostigmata, Macrochelidae). Bratislava, Slovakia: Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Science.
  • Mašán P (2003b). Identification key to Central European species of Trachytes (Acari: Uropodina) with redescription, ecology and distribution of Slovak species. Eur J Entomol 100: 435-448.
  • Mašán P, Fenďa P (2004). Zerconid mites of Slovakia (Acari, Mesostigmata, Zerconidae. Bratislava, Slovakia: Institute of Zoology, Slovakia Academy of Science.
  • Mašán P, Stanko S (2005). Mesostigmatic mites (Acari) and fleas (Siphonaptera) associated with nests of mound-building mouse, Mus spicilegus Petényi, 1882 (Mammalia, Rodentia). Acta Parasitol 50: 228-234.
  • Mašán P (2007). A review of the family Pachylaelapidae in Slovakia with systematics and ecology of European species (Acari: Mesostigmata: Eviphidoidea). Bratislava, Slovakia: Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Science.
  • Mašán P, Fenďa P, Mihál I (2008). New edaphic mites of the genus Veigaia from Slovakia and Bulgaria, with a key to the European species (Acari, Mesostigmata, Veigaiidae). Zootaxa 1897: 1-19.
  • Mášan P, Halliday B (2010). Review of the European genera of Eviphididae (Acari: Mesostigmata) and the species occurring in Slovakia. Zootaxa 2585: 1-122.
  • Mitchell RJ, Urpeth HM, Britton AJ, Black H, Taylor AR (2016). Relative importance of local- and large-scale drivers of alpine soil microarthropod communities. Oecologia 182: 913-924.
  • Moraza ML (2009). Effects of reforestation with conifers on the communities of mesostigmatic mites in northern Spain (Acari: Mesostigmata). In: Sabelis MW, Bruin J, editors. Trends in Acarology. Dordrecht, The Netherland: Springer, pp. 129-133.
  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre L, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2006). Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index. html.
  • Paquette A, Messier C (2011). The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests. Global Ecol Biogeogr 20: 170-180.
  • Parviainen J (2005). Virgin and natural forests in the temperate zone of Europe. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 79: 9-18.
  • Pătru-Stupariu I, Angelstam P, Elbakidze M, Huzui A, Andersson K (2013). Using forest history and spatial patterns to identify potential high conservation value forests in Romania. Biodivers Conserv 22: 2023-2039.
  • Perdomo G, Sunnucks P, Thompson RM (2012). The role of temperature and dispersal in moss-microarthropod community assembly after a catastrophic event. Philos T R Soc B 367: 3042-3049.
  • Petersen H (1982). Structure and size of soil animal populations. Oikos 39: 306-329.
  • Queralt M, Moraza ML, Miguel AM (2014). Preliminary study of the mite community structure in different black truffle producing soils. Forest Systems 23: 339-348.
  • Ruf A (1998). A maturity index for predatory soil mites (Mesostigmata: Gamasina) as an indicator of environmental impacts of pollution on forest soils. Appl Soil Ecol 9: 447-452.
  • Rutgers M, Schouten AJ, Bloem J, van Eekeren NJM, Goede RGM, Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM, van der Wal A, Mulder C, Brussaard L, Breure AM (2009). Biological measurements in a nationwide soil monitoring network. Eur J Soil Sci 60: 820-832.
  • Salmane I, Brumelis G (2008). The importance of the moss layer in sustaining biological diversity of Gamasina mites in coniferous forest soil. Pedobiologia 52: 69-76.
  • Salmane I, Brumelis G (2010). Species list and habitat preference of Mesostigmata mites (Acari, Parasitiformes) in Latvia. Acarol 50: 373-394.
  • Salmane I, Spungis V (2015). Factors influencing Mesostigmata mites (Acari, Parasitiformes) in the alkaline fen habitats. Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences 69: 50-56.
  • Schnitzlera A, Borleab F (1998). Lessons from natural forests as keys for sustainable management and improvement of naturalness in managed broadleaved forests. Forest Ecol Manag 109: 293- 303.
  • Seniczak S, Seniczak A, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Coulson SJ (2014). Community structure of oribatid and gamasid mites (Acari) in moss-grass tundra in Svalbard (Spitsbergen, Norway). Arct Antarct Alp Res 46: 591-599.
  • Skorupski M, Belter W, Kamczyc J, Wierzbicka A (2008). Soil mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) of the ‘Torfowiska Doliny Izery’ Reserve in the Sudety Mountains. Soil Organisms 80: 261-270.
  • Solomon L (1980). Zerconidae (Acari, Mesostigmata) new to the Romanian fauna. Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle 21: 51-53.
  • Spiecker H (2003). Silvicultural management in maintaining biodiversity and resistance of forests in Europe—temperate zone. J Environ Manage 67: 55-65.
  • ter Braak JFC (1986). Canonical Correspondence Analysis: a new eigenvector technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis. Ecology 67: 1167-1179.
  • Ujvári Z, Kontschán J (2007). New occurrences of the Zerconid mites from Hungary (Acari: Mesostigmata). Folia Historico Naturalia Musei Matraensis 31: 107-114.
  • Wallwork JA (1959). The distribution and dynamics of some forest soil mites. Ecology 40: 557-563.
  • Walter DE, Proctor HC (1999). Mites: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour. Hong Kong: UNSW Press, Everbest Printing.
  • Wisdom R, Arroyo J, Bolger T (2011). A survey of the Oribatida and Mesostigmata (Acarina) of Irish peatlands. Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society 35: 130-149.
  • Zhang XP, Zhang SC, Huang CL (2001). Effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition. Chinese Geogr Sci 11: 283-288.
  • Zhang W, Yuan S, Hu N, Lou Y, Wang S (2015). Predicting soil fauna effect on plant litter decomposition by using boosted regression trees. Soil Biol Biochem 82: 81-86.