Evaluation of methods for molecular sex-typing of three heron species from different DNA sources

Evaluation of methods for molecular sex-typing of three heron species from different DNA sources

Genetic markers are a useful tool for bird population monitoring, especially when combined with ringing data, and particularlyso in vulnerable species. This study compared the effectiveness of two DNA extraction methods: a standard protocol and a commerciallyavailable kit. The molecular sex-typing was performed using PCR-based methods with a 2550F/2718R set of primers in three species ofherons: Great Egret, Purple Heron, and Grey Heron. Genomic DNA was isolated from feathers, eggshells, and eggshell swabs from 26individuals. Overall, better DNA yields and purity were obtained by using the standard protocol isolation method. The highest DNAyield was obtained from the pin feathers compared to the contour feathers and eggshells, both of which had lower yields. Eggshellswabs indicated possible contamination with parental/sibling DNA. Our evaluation demonstrates that the optimization of laboratoryprocedures is beneficial, particularly when different types of noninvasive tissue samples are available.

___

  • Baillie S, Bairlein F, Clark J, Du Feu C, Fiedler W, Fransson T, Hegelbach J, Julliard R, Karcza Z, Keller L (2007). Bird Ringing for Science and Conservation. Thetford, UK: EURING.
  • Bello N, Francino O, Sánchez A (2001). Isolation of genomic DNA from feathers. J Vet Diagn Invest 13: 162-164.
  • Bush KL, Vinsky MD, Aldridge CL, Paszkowski CA (2005). A comparison of sample types varying in invasiveness for use in DNA sex determination in an endangered population of greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus uropihasianus). Conserv Genet 6: 867-870.
  • Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Christie D (2010). Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 15: Weavers to New World Warblers. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Editions.
  • De Volo SB, Reynolds RT, Douglas MR, Antolin MF (2008). An improved extraction method to increase DNA yield from molted feathers. Condor 110: 762-766.
  • Dubiec A, Zagalska-Neubauer M (2006). Molecular techniques for sex identification in birds. Biological Letters 43: 3-12.
  • Ellegren H (1996). First gene on the avian W chromosome (CHD) provides a tag for universal sexing of non-ratite birds. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 263: 1635-1641.
  • Fridolfsson AK, Ellegren H (1999). A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 30: 116- 121.
  • Griffiths R, Daan S, Dijkstra C (1996). Sex identification in birds using two CHD genes. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 263: 1251-1256.
  • Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJ (1998). A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7: 1071-1075.
  • Griffiths R, Korn RM (1997). A CHD1 gene is Z chromosome linked in the chicken Gallus domesticus . Gene 197: 225-229.
  • Hancock J, Kushlan J (1984). The Herons Handbook. London, UK: Croom Helm.
  • Harvey MG, Bonter DN, Stenzler LM, Lovette IJ (2006). A comparison of plucked feathers versus blood samples as DNA sources for molecular sexing. J Field Ornithol 77: 136-140.
  • Hogan FE, Cooke R, Burridge CP, Norman JA (2008). Optimizing the use of shed feathers for genetic analysis. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 561-567.
  • Horváth MB, Martínez-Cruz B, Negro JJ, Kalmár L, Godoy JA (2005). An overlooked DNA source for non-invasive genetic analysis in birds. J Avian Biol 36: 84-88.
  • Jouventin P, Capdeville D, Cuenot-Chaillet F, Boiteau C (1994). Exploitation of pelagic resources by a non-flying seabird: satellite tracking of the king penguin throughout the breeding cycle. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 106: 11-11.
  • Klaassen RH, Hake M, Strandberg R, Koks BJ, Trierweiler C, Exo KM, Bairlein F, Alerstam T (2014). When and where does mortality occur in migratory birds? Direct evidence from long- term satellite tracking of raptors. J Anim Ecol 83: 176-184.
  • Kralj J, Barisic S (2013). Rare birds in Croatia: third report of the Croatian Rarities Committee. Nat Croat 22: 375.
  • Kushlan JA (2008). Conserving Herons: A Conservation Action Plan for the Herons of the World. Arles, France: Tour du Valat.
  • Martín-Gálvez D, Peralta-Sánchez JM, Dawson DA, Martín-Platero AM, Martínez-Bueno M, Burke T, Soler JJ (2011). DNA sampling from eggshell swabbing is widely applicable in wild bird populations as demonstrated in 23 species. Mol Ecol Resour 11: 481-493.
  • Morinha F, Cabral J, Bastos E (2012). Molecular sexing of birds: a comparative review of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods. Theriogenology 78: 703-714.
  • Rudnick JA, Katzner TE, DeWoody JA (2009). Genetic analyses of noninvasively collected feathers can provide new insights into avian demography and behavior. In: Aronoff JB, editor. Handbook of Nature Conservation. New York, NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers, 2009, pp. 181-197.
  • Schmaltz G, Somers C, Sharma P, Quinn J (2006). Non-destructive sampling of maternal DNA from the external shell of bird eggs. Conserv Genet 7: 543-549.
  • Strausberger B, Ashley MV (2001). Eggs yield nuclear DNA from egg-laying female cowbirds, their embryos and offspring. Conserv Genet 2: 385-390.
  • Trimbos KB, Broekman J, Kentie R, Musters CJ, de Snoo GR (2009). Using eggshell membranes as a DNA source for population genetic research. J Ornithol 150: 915-920.
  • Tutiš V, Kralj J, Radović D, Ćiković D, Barišić S (2013). Red Data Book of Birds in Croatia. Zagreb, Croatia: Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection, State Institute for Nature Protection.
  • Wang Z, Zhou X, Lin Q, Fang W, Chen X (2011). New primers for sex identification in the Chinese Egret and other ardeid species. Mol Ecol Resour 11: 176-179.