A standardised analytical framework for sampling fish communities: relevance to Turkish riverine ecosystems

Fish communities are important indicators of the health of riverine ecosystems. Fish monitoring for The Living Murray (TLM) initiative, one of Australia’s most ambitious restoration undertakings for the degraded river-floodplain biota of the River Murray system (south-eastern Australia), was carried out annually from 2005 to 2011 across six ‘Icon Sites’, including the habitats and reaches therein. These spatial and temporal components of variation in fish community abundance and composition must be taken explicitly into account for consistent assessment of riverine ecosystem health. To address this requirement, a standardised analytical framework, consisting of a sampling design and appropriate statistical methods, is outlined in this study. Based on an extensive dataset, multivariate patterns and univariate trends in fish community structure were analysed to show the flexibility, modularity and ability of the framework. The applicability of the framework to Turkish riverine ecosystems is then discussed with emphasis on the need for participatory discussion between researchers and environmental managers. The possibility to incorporate other measures of fish health such as biomass and condition, and to extend the proposed framework to the quantitative assessment of vegetation and bird communities also exists.

___

  • Anderson AJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008). PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. Plymouth, UK: PRIMER-E Ltd.
  • Bayçelebi E (2020). Distribution and diversity of fish from Seyhan, Ceyhan and Orontes river systems. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96: 747-767. doi: 10.3897/zse.96.55837
  • Boulton AJ (1999). An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and prognosis. Freshwater Biology 41:469-479. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00443.x
  • Buijse AD, Coops H, Staras M, Jans LH, Van Geest GJ et al. (2002). Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe. Freshwater Biology 47: 889-907. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00915.x
  • Burgman M (2005). Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cattanéo F (2005). Does hydrology constrain the structure of fish assemblages in French streams? Regional scale analysis. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 164: 367-385. doi: 10.1127/0003- 9136/2005/0164-0367
  • Çiçek E, Birecikligil S (2016). Ichthyofauna of the Turkish parts of Kura-Aras River Basin. Fishtaxa 1: 14-26. doi: 10.7508/ jft.2016.01.002
  • Çiçek E, Görgün A, Bağra O, Sungur S (2018). EurAsian Fish Index with web based software (EAFI 1.0). Acta Biologica Turcica 31 (4): 209-219.
  • Copp GH (2010). Patterns of diel activity and species richness in young and small fishes of European streams: a review of 20 years of point abundance sampling by electrofishing. Fish and Fisheries 11: 439-460. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00370.x
  • Deffner J, Haase P (2018). The societal relevance of river restoration. Ecology and Society 23 (4). doi: 10.5751/ES-10530-230435
  • Ergönül MB, Breine J, Van Der Bergh E (2018). A technical guide to develop a statistically valid fish-based index in compliance with the Water Framework Directive: an evaluation for Turkish freshwaters. International Aquatic Research 10: 303-319. doi: 10.1007/s40071-018-0209-2
  • Ergönül MB, Breine J, Van Den Bergh E, Bahceci H (2020). Biological Assessment of some wadable rivers in Turkey using fish data; a statistical approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability 22: 7385-7425. doi: 10.1007/s10668-019-00526-x
  • Fausch KD, Lyons J, Karr JR, Angermeier PL (1990). Fish communities as indicators of environmental degradation. American Fisheries Society Symposium 8: 123-144.
  • Gallardo B, Clavero M, Sanchez MI, Vila M (2016). Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Global Change Biology 22: 151-163. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13004
  • Haase P, Pilotto F (2019). A method for the reintroduction of entire benthic invertebrate communities in formerly degraded stream. Limnologica 77: 125689. doi: 10.1016/j.limno.2019.125689
  • Humphries P, King AJ, Koehn JD (1999). Fish, flows and flood plains: links between freshwater fishes and their environment in the Murray-Darling River system, Australia. Environmental Biology of Fishes 56: 129-151. doi: 10.1023/A:1007536009916
  • Hurlbert SH (1984). Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187-211. doi: 10.2307/1942661
  • Jekel H (2005). Sustainable water management in Europe—the water framework directive. In: Vogtmann H, Dobretsov N (editors). Transboundary water resources: strategies for regional security and ecological stability. NATO Science Series (Series IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences), Vol. 46. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Jensen AE, Walker KF (2012). A river in crisis: the lower River Murray, Australia. In: Boon PJ, Raven PJ (editors). River Conservation and Management. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 357-370.
  • Kaya C, Bayçelebi E, Turan D (2020). Taxonomic assessment and distribution of fishes in upper Kura and Aras river drainages. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96: 325-344. doi: 10.3897/ zse.96.52241
  • Keith DA (2000). Sampling designs, field techniques and analytical methods for systematic plant population surveys. Ecological Management & Restoration 1: 125-139. doi: 10.1046/j.1442- 8903.2000.00034.x
  • Kirk RE (1995). Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd ed. Pacific Grove, CA, USA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
  • Koehn JD, Lintermans M (2012). A strategy to rehabilitate fishes of the Murray-Darling Basin, south-eastern Australia. Endangered Species Research 16: 165-181. doi: 10.3354/esr00398
  • Lintermans M (2007). Fishes of the Murray-Darling Basin: An Introductory Guide. MDBC Publication No. 10/07, Murray- Darling Basin Commission. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Murray-Darling Basin Authority.
  • Maheshwari BL, Walker KF, McMahon TA (1995). Effects of regulation on the flow regime of the River Murray, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 10: 15-38. doi: 10.1002/rrr.3450100103
  • Mead R (1988). The Design of Experiments. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Milliken GA, Johnson DE (2008). Analysis of Messy Data: Volume 1: Designed Experiments. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
  • Nash RD, Valencia AH, Geffen AJ (2006). The origin of Fulton’s condition factor—setting the record straight. Fisheries 31: 236- 238.
  • Pilotto F, Tonkin JD, Januschke K, Lorenz AW, Jourdan J et al. (2019). Diverging response patterns of terrestrial and aquatic species to hydromorphological restoration. Conservation Biology 33: 132-141. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13176
  • Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002). Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • R Development Core Team (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation.
  • Ralph T, Spencer JA, Rayner TS (2010). Fish. In: Rogers K, Ralph T (editors). Floodplain Wetland Biota in the Murray-Darling Basin: Water and Habitat Requirements. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Publishing, pp. 205-251.
  • Şekercioğlu ÇH, Anderson S, Akçay E, Bilgin R, Can ÖE et al. (2011). Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis. Biological Conservation 144: 2752-2769. doi: 10.1016/j. biocon.2011.06.025
  • Souter NJ, Cunningham S, Little S, Wallace T, McCarthy B et al. (2010). Evaluation of a visual assessment method for tree condition of eucalypt floodplain forests. Ecological Management & Restoration 11: 210-214. doi: 10.1111/j.1442- 8903.2010.00551.x
  • Stuart IG, Jones M (2006). Large, regulated forest floodplain is an ideal recruitment zone for non-native common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Marine and Freshwater Research 57: 333-347. doi: 10.1071/MF05035
  • Vilizzi L (2005). The linear model diagram: a graphical method for the display of factor relationships in experimental design. Ecological Modelling 184: 263-275. doi: 10.1016/j. ecolmodel.2004.09.004
  • Vilizzi L (2012a). System Understanding Project: Recommendations for Fish Community Assessment. Final Report prepared for the Murray-Darling Basin Authority by The Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, MDFRC Publication 11/2012, July. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Murray-Darling Basin Authority, p. 85. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20696.42241
  • Vilizzi L (2012b). Abundance trends in floodplain fish larvae: the role of annual flow characteristics in the absence of overbank flooding. Fundamental and Applied Limnology 181: 215-227. doi:10.1127/1863-9135/2012/0394
  • Vilizzi L, McCarthy BJ, Scholz O, Sharpe CP, Wood DB (2013). Managed and natural inundation: benefits for conservation of native fish in a semi-arid wetland system. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 23: 37-50. doi: 10.1002/aqc.2281
  • Von Ende CN (2001). Repeated-measures analysis: growth and other time-dependent measures. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (editors). Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall, pp. 3-13.
  • Yerli SV, Kormaz M, Mangıt F (2016). Biological assessment by a fish- based index of biotic integrity for Turkish inland waters. In: Taylor WW, Bartley DM, Goddard CI, Leonard NJ, Welcomme R (editors). Freshwater, Fish and the Future: Proceedings of the Global Cross-sectoral Conference. Rome, Italy: FAO, pp. 91- 97. doi: 10.47886/9789251092637.ch9
  • Yoğurtçuoğlu B, Kaya C, Freyhof J (2020). Freshwater fishes of the Anatolian midwestern black sea basin. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 30: 111-130. doi: 10.23788/IEF- 1152
  • Walker KF, Thoms MC (1993). Environmental effects of flow regulation on the lower River Murray, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 8: 103-119. doi: 10.1002/ rrr.3450080114
  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009). Mixed Effects Models and Extension in Ecology with R. New York, NY, USA: Springer.