Amir Reza SHAVIKLO, Amir Hossein ALIZADEH-GHAMSARI, Yasaman ETEMADIAN, Fereidoon RAFIPOUR

The effects of dietary fish protein hydrolysate-based supplementation on sensory properties and meat quality of broiler chicken

The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of supplement fish protein hydrolysate-based to broiler feed on sensory properties and meat quality. A total of 400 pieces of 1-day-old male broiler chicks (Ross 308) received 4 dietary levels (0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5%) of fish protein hydrolysate-based supplement (FPHS) in the basal diet mix for 42 days. Quality index-derived method (QIM) was used for assessment of chicken carcass. Quantitative descriptive analysis method was applied to study sensory properties of the chicken fillets. Water holding capacity (WHC), cook loss, color, meat texture were also determined. The carcass odor and flavor in broilers received 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5% FPHS were significantly different from those of control. The highest intensity of darkness, reddish pink, and yellowness of the legs and breast was observed in the carcass of control treatment. The highest fat content (1.34%) and WHC (70.36%) were reported in treatments received 7.5% FPHS. The umami taste was detected in chicken broth and cooked fillets of broilers fed received FPHS, which was not detected in the control treatment. The umami (a pleasant savory taste) was sensed more strongly in the cooked fillet followed by chicken broth. Breast fillet of birds received FPHS had a better texture, which was confirmed by shear stress measurement. The results could be helpful in application of FPHS in the poultry farming especially in the countries looking for local feed protein products as soybean meal replacement.

PDF

___

1. Haščík P, Garlík J, ElaminElimam IO, Kňazovická V, Bobko M, Kačániová M. Influence of propolis extract in Hubbard JV chickens nutrition on oxidative stability of meat. Actafytotech Zootech 2014; 17: 47-51. doi: 10.15414/afz.2014.17.02.47–51
2. Ayseli Mt, Filik G, Selli S. Evaluation of volatile compounds in chicken breast meat using simultaneous distillation and extraction with odour activity value. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research 2014; 53 (2): 137-142.
3. Iran’s Ministry of Agriculture, Deputy of Livestock Production, Animal Products Statistics, Tehran, Iran, 2021.
4. Khan S, Khan RU, Alam W, Sultan A. Evaluating the nutritive profile of three insect meals and their effects to replace soya bean in broiler diet. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 2018; 102: e662-e668. doi:10.1111/ jpn.12809
5. del Bosque CIE, Altmann BA, Ciulu M, Halle I, Jansen S et al. Meat quality parameters and sensory properties of one highperforming and two local chicken breeds fed with Vicia faba. Foods 2020; 9: 1052.doi:10.3390/foods9081052
6. Kristinsson HG, Rasco BA. Fish protein hydrolysates: production, biochemical, and functional properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2000; 40: 43-81. doi:10.1080/10408690091189266
7. Siddik MAB, Howieson J, Fotedar R, Partridge GJ. Enzymatic fish protein hydrolysates in finfish aquaculture: a review. Reviews in Aquaculture 2021; 13: 406-430. doi:10.1111/ raq.12481
8. Ahuja K, Mamtani K. Fish Protein Hydrolysate Market Size. Global Market Insights, Report ID: GMI3071. Inc. USA. 2020. Accessible from https://www.gminsights.com.
9. Etemadian Y, Ghaemi V, Shaviklo AR, Pourashouri P, Sadeghi Mahoonak, A et al. Development of animal/ plant-based protein hydrolysate and its application in food, feed and nutraceutical industries: state of the art. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 278:123219. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123219
10. Niu J, Zhang YQ, Liu YJ, Tian LX, Lin HZ et al. Effects of graded replacement of fishmeal by fish protein hydrolysate on growth performance of early post-larval Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeusvannamei, Boone). Journal of Applied Animal Research 2014; 42: 6-15. doi:10.1080/ 09712119.2013.795897
11. Perez-Alvarez JA, Sendra-Nadal E, Sanchez-Zapata EJ, ViudaMartos, M. Poultry flavour: general aspects and applications. In: Guerrero Legarreta I, Hui YH (editors) Handbook Of Poultry Science And Technology: Secondary Processing. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
12. Tejpal CS, Vijayagopal P, Elavarasan K, Prabu DL, Lekshmi RGK et al. Evaluation of pepsin derived tilapia fish waste protein hydrolysate as a feed ingredient for silver pompano (Trachinotusblochii) fingerlings: Influence on growth, metabolism, immune and disease resistance. Animal Feed Science & Technology 2021; 272, 114748. doi:10.1016/j. anifeedsci.2020.114748
13. McNaughton JL, May JD, Reece FN, Deaton JW. Broiler chick utilization of hydrolyzed fish protein. Poultry Science 1978; 57:1157.
14. Wu YC, Kellems RO, Holmes HS, Nakaue ZA. The effect of feeding four fish hydrolyzate meals on broiler performance and carcass sensory characteristics. Poultry Science 1984; 63: 2414- 2418.doi:10.3382/ps.0632414
15. Mahata ME, Dharma A, Ryanto HI, Rizal Y. Effect of substituting shrimp waste hydrolysate of penaeusmerguensis for fishmeal in broiler performance. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 2008; 7: 806-810.doi:10.3923/pjn.2008.806.810
16. Hardini D, Djunaidi IH. Influence of dietary bacillus sp. fermented shrimp waste on broiler meat quality. International Journal of Poultry Science 2010; 9: 455-458.doi: 10.3923/ ijps.2010.455.458
17. AOAC. Official methods of analysis, 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA. 2000.
18. Zhuang H, Savage EM. Comparisons of sensory descriptive flavor and texture profiles of cooked broiler breast fillets categorized by raw meat color lightness values. Poultry Science 2010; 89: 1049-1055. doi:10.3382/ps.2009-00422
19. Ryoichi S, Degychi T, Nagata Y. Effectiveness of the filter paper press methods for determining the water holding capacity of meat. Fleischwirtsch 1993; 73:1399-1400.
20. ISO,8589. Sensory analysis: general guidance for the design of test rooms. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. 2007.
21. ISO,8586. Sensory analysis: general guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. 2012.
22. Meilgaard MC, Civille GV, Caar BT. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, (4th ed.) Chapter 4, CRC Press/ Taylor and Francis Group, USA: Boca Raton; 2007.
23. Noguchi M, Arai S, Yamashita M, Kato H, Fujimaki M. Isolation and identification of acidic oligopeptides occurring in a flavor-potentiating fraction from a fish protein hydrolysate. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1975; 23: 49-53.
24. Farkaš P, Sádecká J, Kováč M, Siegmund B, Leitner E et al. Key odourants of pressure-cooked hen meat. Food Chemistry 1997; 60: 617-621.
25. Selli S, Rannou C, Prost C, Robin J, Serot T. Characterization of aroma-active compounds in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) eliciting an off odour. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2006; 54: 9496-9502.
26. Selli S, Prost C, Serot T. Odour-active and off odour components in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) extracts obtained by microwave and assisted distillation-solvent extraction. Food Chemistry 2009; 114: 317-322.
27. Aliani M, Farmer, LJ. Precursors of chicken flavor. I. Determination of some flavor precursors in chicken muscle. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2005; 53: 6067- 6072.
28. Huang CT, Ho CT. Flavors of meat products. In: Hui YH, Nip WK, Rogers RW, Young OA (editors). Meat Science and Applications. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker; 2001. pp. 71- 102.
29. Delort E, Velluz A, Freot E, Rubin M, Jaquier A, Linder S, Eidman KF, MacDougall BS. Identification and synthesis of new volatile molecules found in extracts obtained from distinct parts of cooked chicken. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2011; 59: 11752-11763.
30. Gengjun C, Huanlu S, Changwei M. Aroma active compounds of Beijing roast duck. Flavour and Fragrance Journal 2009; 24:186-191.
31. Wettasinghe M, Vasanthan T, Temelli F, Swallow K. Volatile flavour composition of cooked by-products blends of chicken, beef and pork: a quantitative GC-MS investigation. Food Research International 2001; 34: 149-158.
32. Kiyohara R, Yamaguchi S, Rikimaru K, Takahashi H. Supplemental arachidonic acid-enriched oil improves the taste of thigh meat of Hinai-jidori chickens. Poultry Science 2011; 90: 1817-1822. doi:10.3382/ps.2010-01323
33. Ramaswamy HS, Richards JF. Flavor of poultry meat – A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology 1982; 15:7-18.
34. Pieterse E, Pretoriusm Q, Hoffmanm LC, Drew DW. The carcass quality, meat quality and sensory characteristics of broilers raised on diets containing either Musca domestica larvae meal, fishmeal or soya bean meal as the main protein source. Animal Production Science 2013; 54: 622-628. doi:10.1071/AN13073
35. Kerler J, Grosch W. Character impact odorants of boiled chicken: Changes during refrigerated storage and reheating. Zeitschrift für LebensmittelUntersuchung und -Forschung A 1997; 205: 232-238.
36. Mottram DS. Flavour formation in meat and meat products: a review. Food Chemistry 1998; 62 (4): 415-424.
37. Noleau L, Toulemonde B. Volatile components of roasted chicken fat. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und –Technologie 1987; 20: 37-41.
38. Fu Y, Chen J, Bak KH, Lametsch R. Valorisation of protein hydrolysates from animal by- products: perspectives on bitter taste and debittering methods: a review. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 2019; 54: 978-986. doi:10.1111/ ijfs.14037
39. Steinsholm S, Oterhals Å,Underhaug J, Måge I, Malmendal A et al. Sensory assessment of fish and chicken protein hydrolysates. Evaluation of NMR metabolomics profiling as a new prediction tool. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2020; 68: 3881- 3890. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.9b07828
40. Kurihara K. Umami the fifth basic taste: history of studies on receptor mechanisms and role as a food flavor. BioMed Research International 2015; 189402. doi:10.1155/2015/189402
41. Yamaguchi S. Fundamental properties of umami taste. Journal of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan 1991; 65: 903- 906.doi:10.1271/nogeikagaku1924.65.903
42. Yamamoto S, Tomoe M, Toyama K, Kawai M, Uneyama H. Can dietary supplementation of monosodium glutamate improve the health of the elderly? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2009; 90: 844S-849S. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.27462X
43. Youn SJ, Cha GH, Shin JK. Salty taste enhancing effect of enzymatically hydrolyzed anchovy protein. Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology 2015; 47: 751-756.doi:10.9721/ KJFST.2015.47.6.751
44. Shimono M, Sugiyama K. Salty taste enhancer and food or drink containing same. US Patent No. US8, 932,661 B2. 2015.
45. Park JN, Ishida K, Watanabe T, Endoh K, Watanabe K, et al. Taste effects of oligopeptides in a Vietnamese fish sauce. Fishery Science 2002; 68: 921-928.doi:10.1046/j.1444- 2906.2002.00511.x
46. Horsted K, Allesen-Holm BH, Hermansen JE, Kongsted AG. Sensory profiles of breast meat from broilers reared in an organic niche production system and conventional standard broilers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2012; 92 (2):258-265. doi:10.1002/jsfa.4569
47. Shaviklo AR, Alizadeh-Ghamsari AH, Hosseini SA. Sensory attributes and meat quality of broiler chickens fed with mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), Journal of Food Science and Technology 2021; doi:10.1007/s13197-020-04946-w