Quality of oocytes in prepubertal and pubertal swine

Quality of oocytes in prepubertal and pubertal swine

In vitro fertilization is a common method of fertilization in the case of both humans and animals. Although this method has developed very rapidly, there are still many unanswered questions about the optimal characteristics that oocytes should have for performing this procedure. The object of this study was to describe the correlation between the diameter and size of swine oocytes in relation to pubescence. The research was conducted on ovaries of piglets (n = 65) and adult swine (n = 69). Each oocyte was examined with and without the zona pellucida. The analysis showed that the average size of the oocyte from antral follicles is 134.59 ± 11.87 μm and the size of the oocyte is significantly larger for swine in the reproductive period than for piglets entering the prepubertal period. The differences were observed for oocytes both with and without the zona pellucida, as well as in the zona pellucida itself.

___

  • 1. Stankiewicz T, Błaszczyk B, Udała J. Selected aspects of pig oocytes maturation in vivo and in vitro. Medycyna Wet 2008; 64: 400–403 (in Polish with English abstract).
  • 2. Alwarez GM, Dalvit GC, Achi MV, Miguez MS, Cetica PD. Immature oocyte quality and maturational competence of porcine cumulus-oocyte complexes subpopulations. Biocell 2009; 3: 167–177.
  • 3. Motlik J, Kubelka M. Cell-cycle aspects of growth and maturation of mammalian oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1990; 27: 366–375.
  • 4. Abaydera L. In vitro production of embryos in swine. Theriogenology 2002; 57: 256–273.
  • 5. Telfer EE. In vitro models for oocyte development. Theriogenology 1998; 49: 451–460.
  • 6. Huanmin Z, Yong Z. Development of caprine ovarian preantral follicles. Theriogenology 2000; 4: 641–650.
  • 7. Rüsse J, Sinowatz F. Lehrbuch der Embryologie der Haustiere. Berlin, Germany: Verlag Paul Parey; 1991 (in German).
  • 8. Funahashi H, Cantley TC, Stumpf TT, Terlouw SL, Day BN. Use of low-salt culture medium for in vitro maturation of porcine oocytes is associated with elevated oocyte glutathione levels and enhanced male pronuclear formation after in vitro fertilization. Biol Reprod 1994; 51: 633–639.
  • 9. Peters JK, Milliken G, Davis DL. Development of porcine oocytes in vitro: effects of culture medium and donor age. J Anim Sci 2001; 79: 1578–1583.
  • 10. Ikeda K, Takahashi Y. Comparison of maturational and developmental parameters of oocytes recovered from pubertal and adult pigs. Reprod Fertil Dev 2003; 15: 215–221.
  • 11. Sherrer ES, Rathbun TJ, Davis DL. Fertilization and blastocyst development in oocytes obtained from prepubertal and adult pigs. J Anim Sci 2004; 82: 102–108.
  • 12. Bagg MA, Vassena R, Papasso-Brambilla E, Grupen CG, Armstrong DT, Gandolfi F. Change in ovarian, follicular, and oocyte morphology immediately after the onset of puberty are not accompanied by an increase in oocyte developmental competence in the pig. Theriogenology 2004; 62: 1003–1011.
  • 13. Gandolfi F, Brevini TAL, Cillio F, Antonini S. Cellular and molecular mechanism regulating oocyte quality and the relevance for farm animal reproductive efficiency. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 2005; 24: 413–423.
  • 14. Opiela J, Kątska-Książiewicz L. Charakterystyka zdolności rozwojowej oocytów ssaków w aspekcie zapłodnienia i rozwoju zarodkowego. Cz. II. Regulacja dojrzałości cytoplazmatycznej i genomowej. Biotechnologia 2005; 2: 151–162 (in Polish).
  • 15. Kowalska BD, Okólski A. Reproduction of prepubertal females. Medycyna Wet 2007; 83: 151–155 (in Polish with English abstract).
  • 16. Hurk R, Bevers MM, Beckers JF. In-vivo and in-vitro development of preantral follicles. Theriogenology 1997; 47: 73–82.
  • 17. Hiaro Y, Ngai T, Kubo M, Miyana T, Miyaki M, Kato S. In vitro growth and maturation of pig oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 1994; 100: 333–339.
  • 18. Chian RC, Chung JT, Downey BR, Tan SL. Maturational and developmental competence of immature oocytes retrieved from bovine ovaries at different phases of folliculogenesis. Reprod Biomed 2002; 4: 127–132.
  • 19. Luca X, Martinez EA, Roca J, Vazquez JM, Gil MA, Pastor LM, Alabart JLJ. Relationship between antral follicle size, oocyte diameters and nuclear maturation of immature oocytes in pigs. Theriogenology 2002; 58: 871–875.
  • 20. Songsasen N, Wildt DE. Size of the donor follicle, but not stage of reproductive cycle or seasonality, influences meiotic competency of selected domestic dog oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 2005; 72: 113–119.
  • 21. Manjunatha BM, Gupta PS, Ravindra JP, Devaraj M, Ramesh HS, Nandi S. In vitro developmental competence of buffalo oocytes collected at various stages of the estrous cycle. Theriogenology 2007; 68: 882–888.
  • 22. Griffin J, Emery BR, Huang I, Peterson CM, Carrell DT. Comparative analysis of follicle morphology and oocyte diameter in four mammalian species (mouse, hamster, pig and human). J Exp Clin Assist Reprod 2006; 3: 5–9.
  • 23. Erickson G, Shimasaki S. The physiology of folliculogenesis: the role of novel growth factors. Fertil Steril 2001; 76, 5; 943–949.
  • 24. Lucas X, Martinez EA, Roca J, Vazquez JM, Gil ML, Pastor LM, Alabart JL. Relationship between antral follicle size, oocyte diameters and nuclear maturation of immature oocytes in pig. Theriogenology 2003; 60: 659–667.
  • 25. Marchal R, Vigneron C, Perreau C, Bali-Papp A, Mermillod P. Effect of follicular size on meiotic and developmental competence of porcine oocytes. Theriogenology 2002; 57: 1523–1532.