Productive response to two concentrate allocation strategies in dairy cows grazing with restricted pasture allowance
Productive response to two concentrate allocation strategies in dairy cows grazing with restricted pasture allowance
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of two concentrate allotment strategies on the performance of dairy cowsgrazing on restricted pasture and supplemented with conserved forage. Dairy cows fed equal amounts of concentrate (fixed daily rate:5.5 kg DM/cow) were compared to cows supplemented with concentrate according to their lactation stage as follows: 10.0, 5.0, and 1.5kg DM/cow daily during early, mid, and late lactation, respectively (average daily dose: 5.5 kg DM/cow). There was a supplementationstrategy × lactation stage interaction (P < 0.05) for energy-corrected milk (ECM). For early lactation cows, supplementation at a variablerate increased ECM yield by 14.61% (P < 0.05). There was a supplementation strategy × lactation stage interaction (P < 0.05) for bodyweight change. At late lactation stage, cows supplemented at a fixed rate gained weight (+ 0.16 kg/day), whereas those supplemented ata variable rate lost weight (– 0.08 kg/day; P < 0.05). No significant effect was found for body condition score. The prioritization of milkproduction rather than the attenuation of body reserve mobilization suggests that concentrate allowance based on lactation stage maybe unsuitable for minimizing the negative energy balance in early lactation cows.
___
- 1. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Dairy: World Markets
and Trade. Washington, DC, USA: USDA Foreign Agricultural
Service; 2016.
- 2. Kennedy E, O’Donovan M, O´Mara FP, Murphy JP, Delaby L.
The effect of early-lactation feeding strategy on the lactation
performance of spring-calving dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90:
3060-3070.
- 3. Yan T, Mayne CS, Keady TWJ, Agnew RE. Effects of dairy cow
genotype with two planes of nutrition on energy partitioning
between milk and body tissue. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 1031-1042.
- 4. Mackey DR, Gordon AW, McCoy MA, Verner M, Mayne CS.
Associations between genetic merit for milk production and
animal parameters and the fertility performance of dairy cows.
Animal 2007; 1: 29-43.
- 5. André G, Berentsen PBM, Van Duinkerken G, Engel B, Oude
Lansink AGJM. Economic potential of individual variation in
milk yield response to concentrate intake of dairy cows. J Agr
Sci 2010; 148: 263-276.
- 6. Garcia SC, Pedernera M, Fulkerson WJ, Hordagoda A, Nandra
K. Feeding concentrates based on individual cow requirements
improves the yield of milk solids in dairy cows grazing
restricted pasture. Aust J Exp Agr 2007; 47: 502-508.
- 7. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient Requirements of
Dairy Cattle. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: Academic Press;
2001.
- 8. Gallardo MR, Castillo AR, Bargo F, Abdala AA, Maciel MG,
Perez-Monti H, Castro HC, Castelli ME. Monensin for lactating
dairy cows grazing mixed-alfalfa pasture and supplemented
with partial mixed ration. J Dairy Sci 2005; 88: 644-652.
- 9. Buskirk DD, Zanella AJ, Harrigan TM, Van Lente JL, Gnagey
LM, Kaercher MJ. Large round bale feeder design affect hay
utilization and beef cow behavior. J Anim Sci 2003; 81: 109-
115.
- 10. Devries TJ, Beauchemin KA, Von Keyserlingk MAG. Dietary
forage concentration affects the feed sorting behavior of
lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 5572-5579.
- 11. Roche JR. Milk production responses to pre-and postcalving
dry matter intake in grazing dairy cows. Livest Sci 2007; 110:
12-24.
- 12. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods
of Analysis. 15th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC; 1990.
- 13. Leonardi C, Armentano LE. Effect of quantity, quality, and
length of alfalfa hay on selective consumption by dairy cows. J
Dairy Sci 2003; 86: 557-564.
- 14. Zebeli Q, Mansmann D, Steingass H, Ametaj BN. Balancing
diets for physically effective fibre and ruminally degradable
starch: a key to lower the risk of sub-acute rumen acidosis and
improve productivity of dairy cattle. Livest Sci 2010; 127: 1-10.
- 15. Gaines WL, Davidson FA. Relation between Percentage of Fat
Content and Yield of Milk. Urbana, IL, USA: University of
Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station; 1923.
- 16. Kolver ES, Roche JR, Burke CR, Kay JR, Aspin W. Extending
lactation in pasture-based dairy cows: I. Genotype and diet
effect on milk and reproduction. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 5518-
5530.
- 17. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT User’s Guide (2002-2010). Cary, NC,
USA: SAS Institute; 2010.
- 18. Hills JL, Wales WJ, Dunshea FR, Garcia SC, Roche JR. Invited
review: An evaluation of the likely effects of individualized
feeding of concentrate supplements to pasture-based dairy
systems. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98: 1363-1401.
- 19. Dillon P. Practical aspects of feeding grass to dairy cows. In:
Garnsworthy PC, Wiseman J, editors. Recent Advances in
Animal Nutrition. Nottingham, UK: University Press; 2009.
pp. 77-98.
- 20. Bargo F, Muller LD, Kolver ES, Delahoy JE. Invited review:
Production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on
pasture. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86: 1-42.
- 21. Rakes AH, Davenport DG. Response of dairy cows to two
systems of distributing annual concentrates over the lactation
cycle. J Dairy Sci 1971; 54: 1300-1304.
- 22. Hall JW, Majak W. Plant and animal factors in legume bloat. In:
Cheeke, PR, editor. Toxicants of Plant Origin. Vol. III, Proteins
and Amino Acids. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 1989. pp.
94-106.
- 23. Elizalde JC, Rearte DH, Santini FJ. Utilización de silaje de maíz
en vacas lecheras en pastoreo. Balcarce, Argentina: EEA INTABalcarce;
1993 (in Spanish).
- 24. Bretschneider G, Peralta M, Santini FJ, Fay JP, Faverin C.
Influence of corn silage supplementation before alfalfa grazing
on ruminal environment in relation to the occurrence of frothy
bloat in cattle. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2007; 136: 23-37.
- 25. Mertens DR. Creating a system for meeting the fiber
requirements of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80: 1463-1481.
- 26. Harb MY, Reynolds VS, Campling RC. Eating behavior, social
dominance and voluntary intake of silage in group-fed milking
cattle. Grass Forage Sci 1985; 40: 113-118.
- 27. Leaver JD, Yarrow NH. The intake of maize silage by self-fed
heifers allowed restricted access. J Brit Grassland Soc 1977; 32:
165-169.
- 28. Grant RJ, Albright JL. Effect of animal grouping on feeding
behavior and intake of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84 (E.
Suppl.): E156-E163.
- 29. Devries TJ, Von Keyserlingk MAG. Feed stalls affect the social
and feeding behavior of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2006;
89: 3522-3531.
- 30. Albright JL. Feeding behavior of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 1993;
76: 485-498.