Productive response to two concentrate allocation strategies in dairy cows grazing with restricted pasture allowance

Productive response to two concentrate allocation strategies in dairy cows grazing with restricted pasture allowance

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of two concentrate allotment strategies on the performance of dairy cowsgrazing on restricted pasture and supplemented with conserved forage. Dairy cows fed equal amounts of concentrate (fixed daily rate:5.5 kg DM/cow) were compared to cows supplemented with concentrate according to their lactation stage as follows: 10.0, 5.0, and 1.5kg DM/cow daily during early, mid, and late lactation, respectively (average daily dose: 5.5 kg DM/cow). There was a supplementationstrategy × lactation stage interaction (P < 0.05) for energy-corrected milk (ECM). For early lactation cows, supplementation at a variablerate increased ECM yield by 14.61% (P < 0.05). There was a supplementation strategy × lactation stage interaction (P < 0.05) for bodyweight change. At late lactation stage, cows supplemented at a fixed rate gained weight (+ 0.16 kg/day), whereas those supplemented ata variable rate lost weight (– 0.08 kg/day; P < 0.05). No significant effect was found for body condition score. The prioritization of milkproduction rather than the attenuation of body reserve mobilization suggests that concentrate allowance based on lactation stage maybe unsuitable for minimizing the negative energy balance in early lactation cows.

___

  • 1. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Dairy: World Markets and Trade. Washington, DC, USA: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service; 2016.
  • 2. Kennedy E, O’Donovan M, O´Mara FP, Murphy JP, Delaby L. The effect of early-lactation feeding strategy on the lactation performance of spring-calving dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 3060-3070.
  • 3. Yan T, Mayne CS, Keady TWJ, Agnew RE. Effects of dairy cow genotype with two planes of nutrition on energy partitioning between milk and body tissue. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 1031-1042.
  • 4. Mackey DR, Gordon AW, McCoy MA, Verner M, Mayne CS. Associations between genetic merit for milk production and animal parameters and the fertility performance of dairy cows. Animal 2007; 1: 29-43.
  • 5. André G, Berentsen PBM, Van Duinkerken G, Engel B, Oude Lansink AGJM. Economic potential of individual variation in milk yield response to concentrate intake of dairy cows. J Agr Sci 2010; 148: 263-276.
  • 6. Garcia SC, Pedernera M, Fulkerson WJ, Hordagoda A, Nandra K. Feeding concentrates based on individual cow requirements improves the yield of milk solids in dairy cows grazing restricted pasture. Aust J Exp Agr 2007; 47: 502-508.
  • 7. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: Academic Press; 2001.
  • 8. Gallardo MR, Castillo AR, Bargo F, Abdala AA, Maciel MG, Perez-Monti H, Castro HC, Castelli ME. Monensin for lactating dairy cows grazing mixed-alfalfa pasture and supplemented with partial mixed ration. J Dairy Sci 2005; 88: 644-652.
  • 9. Buskirk DD, Zanella AJ, Harrigan TM, Van Lente JL, Gnagey LM, Kaercher MJ. Large round bale feeder design affect hay utilization and beef cow behavior. J Anim Sci 2003; 81: 109- 115.
  • 10. Devries TJ, Beauchemin KA, Von Keyserlingk MAG. Dietary forage concentration affects the feed sorting behavior of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 5572-5579.
  • 11. Roche JR. Milk production responses to pre-and postcalving dry matter intake in grazing dairy cows. Livest Sci 2007; 110: 12-24.
  • 12. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC; 1990.
  • 13. Leonardi C, Armentano LE. Effect of quantity, quality, and length of alfalfa hay on selective consumption by dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86: 557-564.
  • 14. Zebeli Q, Mansmann D, Steingass H, Ametaj BN. Balancing diets for physically effective fibre and ruminally degradable starch: a key to lower the risk of sub-acute rumen acidosis and improve productivity of dairy cattle. Livest Sci 2010; 127: 1-10.
  • 15. Gaines WL, Davidson FA. Relation between Percentage of Fat Content and Yield of Milk. Urbana, IL, USA: University of Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station; 1923.
  • 16. Kolver ES, Roche JR, Burke CR, Kay JR, Aspin W. Extending lactation in pasture-based dairy cows: I. Genotype and diet effect on milk and reproduction. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 5518- 5530.
  • 17. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT User’s Guide (2002-2010). Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute; 2010.
  • 18. Hills JL, Wales WJ, Dunshea FR, Garcia SC, Roche JR. Invited review: An evaluation of the likely effects of individualized feeding of concentrate supplements to pasture-based dairy systems. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98: 1363-1401.
  • 19. Dillon P. Practical aspects of feeding grass to dairy cows. In: Garnsworthy PC, Wiseman J, editors. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. Nottingham, UK: University Press; 2009. pp. 77-98.
  • 20. Bargo F, Muller LD, Kolver ES, Delahoy JE. Invited review: Production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86: 1-42.
  • 21. Rakes AH, Davenport DG. Response of dairy cows to two systems of distributing annual concentrates over the lactation cycle. J Dairy Sci 1971; 54: 1300-1304.
  • 22. Hall JW, Majak W. Plant and animal factors in legume bloat. In: Cheeke, PR, editor. Toxicants of Plant Origin. Vol. III, Proteins and Amino Acids. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 1989. pp. 94-106.
  • 23. Elizalde JC, Rearte DH, Santini FJ. Utilización de silaje de maíz en vacas lecheras en pastoreo. Balcarce, Argentina: EEA INTABalcarce; 1993 (in Spanish).
  • 24. Bretschneider G, Peralta M, Santini FJ, Fay JP, Faverin C. Influence of corn silage supplementation before alfalfa grazing on ruminal environment in relation to the occurrence of frothy bloat in cattle. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2007; 136: 23-37.
  • 25. Mertens DR. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80: 1463-1481.
  • 26. Harb MY, Reynolds VS, Campling RC. Eating behavior, social dominance and voluntary intake of silage in group-fed milking cattle. Grass Forage Sci 1985; 40: 113-118.
  • 27. Leaver JD, Yarrow NH. The intake of maize silage by self-fed heifers allowed restricted access. J Brit Grassland Soc 1977; 32: 165-169.
  • 28. Grant RJ, Albright JL. Effect of animal grouping on feeding behavior and intake of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84 (E. Suppl.): E156-E163.
  • 29. Devries TJ, Von Keyserlingk MAG. Feed stalls affect the social and feeding behavior of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89: 3522-3531.
  • 30. Albright JL. Feeding behavior of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 1993; 76: 485-498.