Pregnancy rate following artificial insemination or natural service in postpartum estrus synchronized beef cattle

The objective of this study was to investigate the pregnancy rate following artificial insemination (AI) or natural service (NS) in postpartum estrous synchronized beef cattle. A total of 85 Brangus cows, postpartum, were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 35 cows and was further subdivided into 7 groups, each consisted of 5 cows that were naturally mated. Group 2 consisted of 40 cows that were artificially inseminated. Estrus synchronization was carried out using a controlled internal drug releasing device (CIDR) containing 1.38 mg of progesterone, for 7 days. Group 1 cows were mixed with bulls at a 1:5 ratio of bull:cows for 7 days and group 2 cows were inseminated 55-58 h after the CIDR removal. Pregnancy was determined using transrectal ultrasonography 32 days after NS and AI. The pregnancy rate was higher in the NS group (28.6%) than in the AI group (18.0%), but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05).

Pregnancy rate following artificial insemination or natural service in postpartum estrus synchronized beef cattle

The objective of this study was to investigate the pregnancy rate following artificial insemination (AI) or natural service (NS) in postpartum estrous synchronized beef cattle. A total of 85 Brangus cows, postpartum, were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 35 cows and was further subdivided into 7 groups, each consisted of 5 cows that were naturally mated. Group 2 consisted of 40 cows that were artificially inseminated. Estrus synchronization was carried out using a controlled internal drug releasing device (CIDR) containing 1.38 mg of progesterone, for 7 days. Group 1 cows were mixed with bulls at a 1:5 ratio of bull:cows for 7 days and group 2 cows were inseminated 55-58 h after the CIDR removal. Pregnancy was determined using transrectal ultrasonography 32 days after NS and AI. The pregnancy rate was higher in the NS group (28.6%) than in the AI group (18.0%), but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05).

___

  • Sheldon, I.M., Lewis, G.S., LeBlanc, S., Gilbert, R.O.: Defi ning postpartum uterine disease in cattle. Th eriogenology, 2006; 65: 1516-1530. 2. Galina, C.S., Horn, M.H., Molina, R.: Reproductive behavior in bulls raised under tropical and subtropical conditions. J. Horm. Behav., 2007; 52: 26-31.
  • Overton, M.W., Sischo W.M.: Comparison of reproductive performance by artifi cial insemination versus natural service sires in California dairies. Th eriogenology, 2005; 64: 603-613.
  • Noakes, D.: Fertility and Infertility. In: A.H. Andrews. Ed. Th e Health of Dairy Cattle, Blackwell Science, Osney Mead, Oxford, England, 2000: 108-148.
  • Opsomer, G., Coryn, M., Deluyker, H., de Kruif, A.: An analysis of ovarian dysfunction in high yielding dairy cows aft er calving based on progesterone profi les. J. Reprod. Dom. Anim., 1998; 33: 193-204.
  • Yavas, Y., Walton, J.S.: Postpartum acyclicity in suckled beef cows: a review. Th eriogenology, 2000; 54:25-55.
  • Williamson, N.B., Morris, R.S., Anderson, G.A.: Pregnancy rates and nonreturn rates following artifi cial and natural breeding in dairy herds. J. Australian Vet., 1978; 54: 111-120.
  • Gordon, I.: Controlled Reproduction in Cattle and Buff aloes. In: Controlled Reproduction in Farm Animals Series. Printed and bound by Antony Rowe Ltd. Eastbourne. 2002. Vol. 1.
  • Yimer, M., Rosnina, Y., Wahid, H., Saharee, A.A., Yap, K.C., Ganesamurthi, P.: Ovarian activity in beef and dairy cows with prolonged postpartum period and heifers that fail to conceive. J. Tropic. Anim. Health Prod., 2010; 42: 607-615.
  • Jainudeen, M.R., Hafez, E.S.E. Reproduction in Farm Animals. 7th edition. New York. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2000.
  • Ganchou, F.P., Belloso, E.S., Stagnaro, C.G., Castillo, G.S., Fonseca, H.: Factors aff ecting fertility according to the postpartum period in crossbred dual-purpose suckling cows in the tropics. J. Trop. Anim. Health. Pro., 2005; 37: 559-572.
  • Williams, G.L.: Sucking as a regulator of postpartum rebreeding in cattle: a review. J. Anim. Sci., 1990; 68: 831-852.
  • Niles, D., Risco, C.A., Th atcher, M.J.: Seasonal evaluation of artifi cial insemination and natural service pregnancy rates in dairy herds. Compend. Contin. J. Vet. Med. Prac. Educ., 2002; 24: S44-S48.
  • Molina, R., Galina, C.S., Maquivar, M., Estrada, S., Chaves, A., Diaz, G.S.: Pregnancy rate in zebu cows with two diff erent postpartum intervals exposed to a two-bull rotational system. J. Vet. Res. Commun., 2003; 27: 671-680.
  • Gordon, I.: Reproductive technologies in Farm animals. Printed and bound in the UK by Cromwell Press. Trowbridge. 2005.
  • Bartolomo, J.A., vanLeeuwen, J.J., Th ieme, M., Sa’fi lho, O.G., Melendez, P., Archbald, L.F., Th atcher, W.W.: Synchronization and resynchronization of insemination in lactating dairy cows with the CIDR insert and the Ovsynch protocol. Th eriogenology, 2009; 72: 869-878.
  • Shibaya M., Murakami S., Tatsukawa Y., Skarzynski D.J., Acosta T.J., Okuda K.: Bovine corpus luteum is an extrapituitary site of prolactin production. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 2006; 73: 512-519.
  • Valergakis, G.E., Arsenos, G., Banos, G.: Comparison of artifi cial insemination and natural service cost eff ectiveness in dairy cattle. J. Anim., 2007; 1: 293-300.
  • Salman, M.R., Polat, P., Kayacik, V., Abdurrahman, O.: Eff ect of Some Reproductive and Metabolic Problems on Fertility Parameters in Dairy Cows. J. Turk. Vet. Anim. Sci., 2004; 28: 71-78.
  • Sheldon, M., Cronin, J., Goetze, L.: Defi ning postpartum uterine disease and the mechanisms of infection and immunity in the female reproductive tract in cattle. Biol. Reprod., 2009; 81: 1025-1032.
  • Borsberry, S., Dobson, H.: Periparturient diseases and their eff ect on reproductive performance in fi ve dairy herds. J. Vet. Res., 1989; 124: 217-219.
  • LeBlanc, S.J., Duffi eld, T.F., Leslie, K.E., Bateman, K.G., Keefe, G.P., Walton, J.S., Johnson, W.H.: Defi ning and diagnosing postpartum clinical endometritis and its impact on reproductive performance in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 2002; 85: 2223-2236.
  • Gilbert, R.O., Shin, S.T., Guard, C.L., Erb, H.N., Frajblat, M.: Prevalence of endometritis and its eff ects on reproductive performance of dairy cows. Th eriogenology, 2005; 64: 1879- 1888.
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0128
  • Yayın Aralığı: 6
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Presence of enterotoxin and verotoxin in Turkish cheeses sold in İstanbul

Enver Barış BİNGÖL, Ömer ÇETİN, Hilal ÇOLAK, Hamparsun HAMPİKYAN

Genotypic variation in the Brucella melitensis hemagglutinin gene in vaccine strains and field isolates in Palestine

Elena AWWAD, Mohammad A. FARRAJ, Kamel ADWAN, Tamer E. ESSAWI

Oncogenic viruses and mechanisms of oncogenesis

Murat ŞEVİK

Comparative hematological variables of Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) kept in Lahore Zoo and Lahore Wildlife Park, Pakistan

Sumera SAJJAD, Umer FAROOQ, Husna MALIK, Maryah ANWAR, Ijaz AHMAD

Evaluation of the effects produced by the addition of growth-promoting products to broiler feed*

Mehmet ARMUT, Ayhan FİLAZİ

Avian influenza virus in migratory and resident birds during migratory season in Boushehr, Iran

Mohammad Javad MEHRABANPOUR, Abdolah RAHIMIAN, Ali SHIRAZINEZHAD, Hossein MOEIN, Mohammad Amin SHAYANFAR

Clinical evaluation of the pocket technique for replacement of prolapsed gland of the third eyelid in dogs

Mohammad Mehdi DEHGHAN, Mir Sepehr PEDRAM, Omid AZARI

Effects of inulin and β-glucan supplementation in broiler diets on growth performance, serum cholesterol, intestinal length, and immune system

Gültekin YILDIZ, Asia Sanhouri ELRAYEH

Morphometric development and changes in the growth and development dynamics of Japanese quail populations bred in Kyrgyzstan

Askarbek TULOBAEV, Hasan ALPAK, Damira BEKTEMIROVA, Aynura TURDUBAEVA

Toxinotyping of Clostridium perfringens isolates by ELISA and PCR from lambs suspected of enterotoxemia

Hasan Hüseyin HADİMLİ*, Osman ERGANİŞ, Zafer SAYIN, Zeki ARAS