Pregnancy rate following artificial insemination or natural service in postpartum estrus synchronized beef cattle
The objective of this study was to investigate the pregnancy rate following artificial insemination (AI) or natural service (NS) in postpartum estrous synchronized beef cattle. A total of 85 Brangus cows, postpartum, were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 35 cows and was further subdivided into 7 groups, each consisted of 5 cows that were naturally mated. Group 2 consisted of 40 cows that were artificially inseminated. Estrus synchronization was carried out using a controlled internal drug releasing device (CIDR) containing 1.38 mg of progesterone, for 7 days. Group 1 cows were mixed with bulls at a 1:5 ratio of bull:cows for 7 days and group 2 cows were inseminated 55-58 h after the CIDR removal. Pregnancy was determined using transrectal ultrasonography 32 days after NS and AI. The pregnancy rate was higher in the NS group (28.6%) than in the AI group (18.0%), but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05).
Pregnancy rate following artificial insemination or natural service in postpartum estrus synchronized beef cattle
The objective of this study was to investigate the pregnancy rate following artificial insemination (AI) or natural service (NS) in postpartum estrous synchronized beef cattle. A total of 85 Brangus cows, postpartum, were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 consisted of 35 cows and was further subdivided into 7 groups, each consisted of 5 cows that were naturally mated. Group 2 consisted of 40 cows that were artificially inseminated. Estrus synchronization was carried out using a controlled internal drug releasing device (CIDR) containing 1.38 mg of progesterone, for 7 days. Group 1 cows were mixed with bulls at a 1:5 ratio of bull:cows for 7 days and group 2 cows were inseminated 55-58 h after the CIDR removal. Pregnancy was determined using transrectal ultrasonography 32 days after NS and AI. The pregnancy rate was higher in the NS group (28.6%) than in the AI group (18.0%), but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05).
___
- Sheldon, I.M., Lewis, G.S., LeBlanc, S., Gilbert, R.O.: Defi ning postpartum uterine disease in cattle. Th eriogenology, 2006; 65: 1516-1530. 2. Galina, C.S., Horn, M.H., Molina, R.: Reproductive behavior in bulls raised under tropical and subtropical conditions. J. Horm. Behav., 2007; 52: 26-31.
- Overton, M.W., Sischo W.M.: Comparison of reproductive performance by artifi cial insemination versus natural service sires in California dairies. Th eriogenology, 2005; 64: 603-613.
- Noakes, D.: Fertility and Infertility. In: A.H. Andrews. Ed. Th e Health of Dairy Cattle, Blackwell Science, Osney Mead, Oxford, England, 2000: 108-148.
- Opsomer, G., Coryn, M., Deluyker, H., de Kruif, A.: An analysis of ovarian dysfunction in high yielding dairy cows aft er calving based on progesterone profi les. J. Reprod. Dom. Anim., 1998; 33: 193-204.
- Yavas, Y., Walton, J.S.: Postpartum acyclicity in suckled beef cows: a review. Th eriogenology, 2000; 54:25-55.
- Williamson, N.B., Morris, R.S., Anderson, G.A.: Pregnancy rates and nonreturn rates following artifi cial and natural breeding in dairy herds. J. Australian Vet., 1978; 54: 111-120.
- Gordon, I.: Controlled Reproduction in Cattle and Buff aloes. In: Controlled Reproduction in Farm Animals Series. Printed and bound by Antony Rowe Ltd. Eastbourne. 2002. Vol. 1.
- Yimer, M., Rosnina, Y., Wahid, H., Saharee, A.A., Yap, K.C., Ganesamurthi, P.: Ovarian activity in beef and dairy cows with prolonged postpartum period and heifers that fail to conceive. J. Tropic. Anim. Health Prod., 2010; 42: 607-615.
- Jainudeen, M.R., Hafez, E.S.E. Reproduction in Farm Animals. 7th edition. New York. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2000.
- Ganchou, F.P., Belloso, E.S., Stagnaro, C.G., Castillo, G.S., Fonseca, H.: Factors aff ecting fertility according to the postpartum period in crossbred dual-purpose suckling cows in the tropics. J. Trop. Anim. Health. Pro., 2005; 37: 559-572.
- Williams, G.L.: Sucking as a regulator of postpartum rebreeding in cattle: a review. J. Anim. Sci., 1990; 68: 831-852.
- Niles, D., Risco, C.A., Th atcher, M.J.: Seasonal evaluation of artifi cial insemination and natural service pregnancy rates in dairy herds. Compend. Contin. J. Vet. Med. Prac. Educ., 2002; 24: S44-S48.
- Molina, R., Galina, C.S., Maquivar, M., Estrada, S., Chaves, A., Diaz, G.S.: Pregnancy rate in zebu cows with two diff erent postpartum intervals exposed to a two-bull rotational system. J. Vet. Res. Commun., 2003; 27: 671-680.
- Gordon, I.: Reproductive technologies in Farm animals. Printed and bound in the UK by Cromwell Press. Trowbridge. 2005.
- Bartolomo, J.A., vanLeeuwen, J.J., Th ieme, M., Sa’fi lho, O.G., Melendez, P., Archbald, L.F., Th atcher, W.W.: Synchronization and resynchronization of insemination in lactating dairy cows with the CIDR insert and the Ovsynch protocol. Th eriogenology, 2009; 72: 869-878.
- Shibaya M., Murakami S., Tatsukawa Y., Skarzynski D.J., Acosta T.J., Okuda K.: Bovine corpus luteum is an extrapituitary site of prolactin production. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 2006; 73: 512-519.
- Valergakis, G.E., Arsenos, G., Banos, G.: Comparison of artifi cial insemination and natural service cost eff ectiveness in dairy cattle. J. Anim., 2007; 1: 293-300.
- Salman, M.R., Polat, P., Kayacik, V., Abdurrahman, O.: Eff ect of Some Reproductive and Metabolic Problems on Fertility Parameters in Dairy Cows. J. Turk. Vet. Anim. Sci., 2004; 28: 71-78.
- Sheldon, M., Cronin, J., Goetze, L.: Defi ning postpartum uterine disease and the mechanisms of infection and immunity in the female reproductive tract in cattle. Biol. Reprod., 2009; 81: 1025-1032.
- Borsberry, S., Dobson, H.: Periparturient diseases and their eff ect on reproductive performance in fi ve dairy herds. J. Vet. Res., 1989; 124: 217-219.
- LeBlanc, S.J., Duffi eld, T.F., Leslie, K.E., Bateman, K.G., Keefe, G.P., Walton, J.S., Johnson, W.H.: Defi ning and diagnosing postpartum clinical endometritis and its impact on reproductive performance in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 2002; 85: 2223-2236.
- Gilbert, R.O., Shin, S.T., Guard, C.L., Erb, H.N., Frajblat, M.: Prevalence of endometritis and its eff ects on reproductive performance of dairy cows. Th eriogenology, 2005; 64: 1879- 1888.