Herbal feed additives containing tannins: impact on in vitro fermentation and methane mitigation from total mixed ration
Herbal feed additives containing tannins: impact on in vitro fermentation and methane mitigation from total mixed ration
Total mixed ration (TMR) containing roughage and concentrate mixture in a 65: 35 ratio on dry matter (DM) basis wassupplemented with herbal feed additives [(HFAs); Acacia catechu (Katha), Areca catechu (Supari), and Acacia nilotica (Babul)] at 0–4%on DM basis to assess their impact on fermentation pattern and methane production by using in vitro gas production technique. Arecacatechu had the highest (P < 0.01) concentration of condensed tannins (CTs), saponins, and vitamin C as compared to other HFAs. Thenet gas production (NGP), digestibility of NDF and true OM, and ME availability, partitioning factor (PF), volatile fatty acids (VFAs),and microbial biomass production were higher (P < 0.01) at 24 h as compared to t-half incubation, irrespective of type and level ofHFAs supplemented. Acacia nilotica had an edge over Acacia catechu with respect to digestibility of nutrients and ME availability. VFAsproduction and efficiency of rumen fermentation was the highest from the Areca catechu-supplemented TMR. Irrespective of type ofHFAs and incubation period, the digestibility of NDF and that of true OM were highest (P < 0.01) at the 1% level of supplementation, butdepressed thereafter. Amongst HFAs-supplemented groups, VFA production and fermentation efficiency were highest at the 2% level.The results conclusively revealed that supplementing Areca catechu and Acacia nilotica at 2% of TMR (DM basis) inhibited the methaneproduction, without affecting the fermentation pattern.
___
- 1. FAO and GDP. 2019. Climate change and the global dairy cattle
sector – The role of the dairy sector in a low-carbon future.
Rome. 36 pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA- 3.0 IGO. Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Global
Dairy Platform Inc.
- 2. EC. Regulation EC No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament
and Council of 22 September 2003 on Additives for Use in
Animal Nutrition. Official Journal of Eurpean Commission
2003; L268: 29-43.
- 3. Valenzuela-Grijalva NV, Pinelli-Saavedra A, Muhlia-Almazan
A, Domínguez-Díaz D, González-Ríos H. Dietary inclusion
effects of phytochemicals as growth promoters in animal
production. Journal of Animal Science and Technology
2017; 59: 8.
- 4. Sebata A, Ndlovu LR, Dube JS. Chemical composition, in vitro
dry matter digestibility and in vitro gas production of five
woody species browsed by Matebele goats (Capra hircus L.)
in a semi-arid savanna, Zimbabwe. Animal Feed Science and
Technology 2011; 170: 122-125.
- 5. Sultan S, Kushwaha BP, Naga SK, Mishra AK, Singh A et al.
In vitro ruminal fermentation, protein and carbohydrate
fractionation, methane production and prediction of twelve
commonly used Indian green forages. Animal Feed Science
and Technology 2012; 178: 2-11.
- 6. Hundal JS, Wadhwa M, Bakshi MPS. Methane mitigation
potential of tannins and their impact on digestibility of
nutrients in-vitro. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology
2016; 16: 505-513.
- 7. Sidhu AS, Wadhwa M. Effect of supplementation of saponin
containing herbs on in vitro methane production under
different feeding systems. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
2019; 89: 82-89
- 8. Puchala R, Min BR, Goetsch AL, Sahlu T. The effect of
condensed tannin-containing forage on methane emission by
goats. Journal of Animal Science 2005; 83: 182-186
- 9. Tavendale MH, Meagher LP, Pacheco D, Walker N, Attwood
GT et al. Methane production from in vitro rumen incubations
with Lotus pedunculatus and Medicago sativa, and effects of
extractable condensed tannin fractions on methanogenesis.
Animal Feed Science and Technology 2005; 123-124: 403-419.
- 10. Mueller-Harvey I. Unraveling the conundrum of tannins in
animal nutrition and health. Journal of the Science of Food and
Agriculture 2006; 86: 2010-2037.
- 11. Bhatta R, Saravanan M, Baruah L, Sampath KT. Nutrient
content, in vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics and
methane reduction potential of tropical tannin-containing
leaves. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2012; 92:
2929-2935.
- 12. Makkar HP, Blümmel M, Borowy NK, Becker K. Gravimetric
determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical
and protein precipitation methods. Journal of the Science of
Food and Agriculture 1993; 61: 161-165.
- 13. Porter LJ, Hrstich LN and Chan BG. The conversion
of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyaniding and
delphinidin. Phytochemistry 1986; 25: 223-230.
- 14. Balabaa SI, Zaki AY, ElShamy AM. Total flavonoids and rutin
content of the different organs of Sophora japonica L. Journal
of Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1974; 57: 752-
755.
- 15. Baccou JC, Lambert F, Sanvaire Y. Spectrophotometric method
for the determination of total steroidal sapogenin. Analyst
1977; 102: 458-466.
- 16. Kumaran A, Karakumaran J. In vitro antioxidant activities of
methanol extracts of five Phyllanthus species from India, LWT
- Food Science and Technology 2007; 40: 344-352.
- 17. Jagota SK, Dani HM. A new colorimetric technique for the
estimation of vitamin C using Folin phenol reagent. Analytical
Biochemistry 1982; 127: 178-182.
- 18. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed. Association
of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC: AOAC
International. 2007.
- 19. Crompton EW, Maynard LA. The relation of cellulose and
lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. Journal of
Nutrition 1938; 15: 987-993.
- 20. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary
fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in
relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 1991; 74:
3583-3597.
- 21. Menke KH, Steingass H. Estimation of the energetic feed value
obtained by chemical analysis and in vitro gas production
using rumen fluid. Animal Research Development 1988; 28:
7-55.
- 22. Menke KH, Rabb L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D et al.. The
estimation of the digestibility and ME content of ruminant
feedstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated
with rumen liquor in vitro. Journal of Agricultural Sciences
(Cambridge) 1979; 93: 217-222.
- 23. France J, Dhanoa MS, Theodorou MK, Lister SJ, Davies DR et
al. A model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated
with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. Journal of
Theoretical Biology 1993; 163: 99-111.
- 24. Cottyn BG, Boucque CV. Rapid method for the gas‒
chromatographic determination of volatile fatty acids in
rumen fluid. Journal of Agriculture Food and Chemistry 1968;
16: 105-107.
- 25. Widiawati Y, Thalib A. Comparison of fermentation kinetics
(in vitro) of grass and shrub legume leaves: the pattern of
VFA concentration, estimated CH4 and microbial biomass
production. Indonesian Journal of Agriculture 2009; 2: 21-27.
- 26. Demeyer DI. Quantitative aspects of microbial metabolism in
the rumen and hindgut. In: Jouany JP (ed) Rumen microbial
metabolism and ruminant digestion. INRA Editions, Paris, pp
217-237. 1991.
- 27. Orskov ER. Manipulation of rumen fermentation for maximum
food utilization. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 1975;
22: 153-182.
- 28. Baran M, Žitòan R. Effect of monensin sodium on fermentation
efficiency in sheep rumen. Archiv Tierzucht / Arch Animal
Breeding 2002; 45: 181-185.
- 29. Czerkawski JW. An Introduction to Rumen Studies. Oxford,
UK: Pergamon Press, 1986.
- 30. IAEA. Laboratory training manual on the Use of Nuclear
Techniques in Animal Nutrition. Technical reports series
No.248, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 301.
1985.
- 31. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods. 7th ed. New
Delhi, India: Oxford and IBH Publications, 1994.
- 32. SPSS. Statistical Packages for Social Sciences. Version 16, SPSS
Inc., Illinois, USA. 2007.
- 33. Systat. 1996. Systat 6.0.1 for Windows: Statistics. SPSS Inc.
Michigan Avenue. Chicago, IL, USA.
- 34. Verma KS, Pandey R. Antioxidant potential of young pods of
Acacia catechu wild collected from Jabalpur region. Journal of
Pharmacology and Phytochemistry 2014; 2: 6 68-73.
- 35. Khatik RK, Sharma A. A review: The phytochemical and
pharmacological properties of a miracle herb Acacia catechu
(L.F) wild. An International Journal of Research in Ayush and
Allied Systems 2014; 1: 26-32.
- 36. Singh BN, Singh BR, Singh RL, Prakash D, Sarma BK et al.
Antioxidant and anti-quorum sensing activities of green pod
of Acacia nilotica L. Food and ChemicalToxicology 2009; 47:
778-786.
- 37. Sahoo A, Ogra RK, Sood A, Ahuja PS. Nutritional evaluation
of bamboo cultivars in sub_Himalayan region of India by
chemical composition and in vitro ruminal fermentation. Grass
Science 2010; 56: 116-125.
- 38. Bakshi MPS, Wadhwa M. Evaluation of forest tree leaves of
semi-hilly arid region as livestock feed. Asian-Australasian
Journal of Animal Science 2004; 17: 777-783.
- 39. Bhatta R, Uyeno Y, Tajima K, Takenaka A, Yabumoto Y et al.
Difference in the nature of tannins on in vitro ruminal methane
and volatile fatty acid production and on methanogenic
archaea and protozoal populations. Journal of Dairy Science
2009; 92: 5512-5522.
- 40. Jayanegaraa A, Palup E. Condensed tannin effects on nitrogen
digestion in ruminants: a meta-analysis from in vitro and in
vivo studies. Media Peternakan, Desember 2010, hlm. 176-181.
doi: 10.5398/medpet.2010.33.3.176
- 41. Lowry L, Kennedy P. Fermentation of flavonols by rumen
organisms. Proceedings of Australian Society of Animal
Production 1996; 21: 366.
- 42. Broudiscou L, Papon Y, Broudiscou AF. Effects of dry plant
extracts on feed degradation and the production of rumen
microbial biomass in a dual outflow fermenter. Animal Feed
Science and Technology 2002; 101: 183-189.
- 43. Van Nevel CJ, Demeyer DI. 1996. Control of rumen
methanogenesis. Environment Monitoring and Assessment
1996; 42: 73-97.
- 44. Patra AK, Saxena J. A new perspective on the use of plant
secondary metabolites to inhibit methanogenesis in the rumen.
Phytochemistry 2010; 71: 1198-1222.
- 45. Dung DD, Godwin IR, Nolan JV. Intake digestibility and
rumen parameters of sheep fed commercial pellets or
supplemented with Barley grain, or freeze-dried barley sprouts
or fresh barley sprouts. In: Proceedings of 36th conference on
Nigerian society for animal production University of Abuja,
Nigeria; 2011. pp. 526-528.
- 46. Makkar HPS, Blummel M, Becker K. In vitro effects of and
interactions between tannins and saponins and fate of tannins
in the rumen. Journal of Science Food and Agriculture 1995;
69: 481-493.
- 47. Czerkawski JW. An introduction to rumen studies. Pergamon
Press, Oxford. 1986.
- 48. Kim ET, Guan LL, Lee SJ, Lee SM, Lee SS et al. Effects
of flavonoid-rich plant extracts on in vitro ruminal
methanogenesis, microbial populations and fermentation
characteristics. Asian-Australas Journal of Animal Sciences
2015; 28: 530-537.
- 49. Archimede H, Eugene M, Marie Magdeleine C, Boval M,
Martin C et al. Comparison of methane production between
C3 and C4 grasses and legumes. Animal Feed Science and
Technology 2011; 166: 59-64.
- 50. Sinz S, Kunz C, Liesegang A, Braun U, Marquardt S et al. In vitro
bioactivity of various pure flavonoids in ruminal fermentation,
with special reference to methane formation. Czech Journal of
Animal Sciences 2018; 63: 293-304.
- 51. Oskoueian E, Abdullah N, Oskoueian A. Effects of flavonoids
on rumen fermentation activity, methane production, and
microbial population. BioMed Research International 2013; 8.