Detection of sensitive and mutant ruminal bacteria isolates from sheep, cattle, and buffalo using 14 therapeutic antibiotics
In the present study, sensitive and mutant colonies of some ruminal bacterial species isolated from sheep, cattle, and buffalo were detected. We counted and considered \"mutant colonies\" the bacterial colonies grown in the clear inhibition zone in the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test. Detected mutant colonies were higher in buffalo than in cattle and sheep. Duricef and metronidazole caused no mutations in any species. The others formed mutant colonies, where roxithromycin = polymyxin = chloramphenicol = gentamicin < erythromycin < vancomycin < piperacillin = cefotaxime < streptomycin < cefoperazone < ciprofloxacin < amikacin. Sheep had the highest number of sensitive isolates, and the number of sensitive isolates was dramatically lower in cattle and buffalo. There were no sensitive isolates with the antibiotic metronidazole, and there was a low number of sensitive isolates with duricef. The other antibiotics had more sensitive isolates (gentamicin = ciprofloxacin = amikacin > streptomycin = piperacillin > erythromycin > vancomycin = cefoperazone = cefotaxime > roxithromycin > polymyxin > chloramphenicol). The number of sensitive isolates of the different ruminant species for all the antibiotics was highest in buffalo, followed by cattle and then sheep (P < 0.05). We could conclude that subtherapeutic antibiotic use in ruminant feeding may lead to the formation of antibiotic-resistant mutant colonies, making their subtherapeutic effect nonexistent.
Detection of sensitive and mutant ruminal bacteria isolates from sheep, cattle, and buffalo using 14 therapeutic antibiotics
In the present study, sensitive and mutant colonies of some ruminal bacterial species isolated from sheep, cattle, and buffalo were detected. We counted and considered \"mutant colonies\" the bacterial colonies grown in the clear inhibition zone in the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test. Detected mutant colonies were higher in buffalo than in cattle and sheep. Duricef and metronidazole caused no mutations in any species. The others formed mutant colonies, where roxithromycin = polymyxin = chloramphenicol = gentamicin < erythromycin < vancomycin < piperacillin = cefotaxime < streptomycin < cefoperazone < ciprofloxacin < amikacin. Sheep had the highest number of sensitive isolates, and the number of sensitive isolates was dramatically lower in cattle and buffalo. There were no sensitive isolates with the antibiotic metronidazole, and there was a low number of sensitive isolates with duricef. The other antibiotics had more sensitive isolates (gentamicin = ciprofloxacin = amikacin > streptomycin = piperacillin > erythromycin > vancomycin = cefoperazone = cefotaxime > roxithromycin > polymyxin > chloramphenicol). The number of sensitive isolates of the different ruminant species for all the antibiotics was highest in buffalo, followed by cattle and then sheep (P < 0.05). We could conclude that subtherapeutic antibiotic use in ruminant feeding may lead to the formation of antibiotic-resistant mutant colonies, making their subtherapeutic effect nonexistent.
___
- Peach KC, Bray WM, Winslow D, Linington PF, Linington RG. Mechanism of action-based classification of antibiotics using high-content bacterial image analysis. Mol Biosyst 2013; 9: 1837– 1848.
- Merck & Co. Thioglycolate broth. In: Merck Microbiology Culture Media Manual. Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA: Merck; 1982. p. 161.
- National Institutes of Health Circular: Culture Media for the Sterility Test, 2nd rev. Bethesda, MD, USA: National Institutes of Health; 1946.
- Moolman GJJ, Wyk MV. Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion susceptibility testing as a screening procedure for cephalosporin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae - correlation with the E-test. South Afr J Epidemiol Infect 2004; 19: 55–59.
- Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw- Hill International; 1980.
- SAS. SAS/STAT User’s Guide (Version 8). Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc.; 1999.
- Van Soest PJ. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Cornell University Press; 1994.
- McCuddin ZP, Carlson SA, Rasmussen MA, Franklin SK. Klebsiella to Salmonella gene transfer within rumen protozoa: implications for antibiotic resistance and rumen defaunation. Vet Microbiol 2006; 114: 275–284.
- Sengupta N, Alam SI, Kumar RB, Singh L. Diversity and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of cultivable anaerobic bacteria from soil and sewage samples of India. Infect Genet Evol 2011; 11: 64–77.
- Russell JB, Strobel HJ. Mini review: Effect of ionophores on ruminal fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 1989; 55: 1–6.
- Fulghum RS, Baldwin BB, Williams PP. Antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic ruminal bacteria. Appl Microbiol 1968; 16: 301– 307.
- Costa SS, Viveiros M, Amaral L, Couto I. Multidrug efflux pumps in Staphylococcus aureus: an update. Open Microbiol 2013; 7: 59–71.
- Callaway TR, Russell JB. Selection of a highly monensin- resistant Prevotella bryantii sub-population with altered outer membrane characteristics. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999; 65: 4753–4759.
- Roberts IS. The biochemistry and genetics of capsular polysaccharide production in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 1996; 50: 285–315.
- Nagaraja TG, Taylor MB. Susceptibility and resistance of ruminal bacteria to antimicrobial feed additives. Appl Environ Microbiol 1987; 53: 1620–1625.