0.5 ���/� at √�%% = 0.9 and 7 ���. Two Monte Carlo event generators have been used for current analysis, and the predictions of the model are compared to the results coming from the ALICE experiment based at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). A detailed analysis has been carried out for three types of events (soft events, hard events and bulk events) categorized by the transverse momentum (�$) of the charged particles. It is observed that the predictions of model, underestimate ALICE data at larger values of �!& while at the low values of �!&, the calculated values of model are close to ALICE data. The predictions at 0.9 TeV explain ALICE data well. At large values of �!&, the models predominantly produce hard events as compared with those perceived from ALICE data. This variance can be observed in the bulk event class, as event generators produce more hard events, whereas experiment gives more soft events. At high multiplicity, the generators underestimate the production of isotropic events. The event generators favor the production of back to back jets (high-�$ jets, low < �$ >) and also generate large multiplicity events. ">
[PDF] Study of the a Study of the average transverse sphericity in $pp$ collisions at erse sphericity in $pp$ collisions at Large Hadron Collider (LHC) energies | [PDF]
0.5 ���/� at √�%% = 0.9 and 7 ���. Two Monte Carlo event generators have been used for current analysis, and the predictions of the model are compared to the results coming from the ALICE experiment based at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). A detailed analysis has been carried out for three types of events (soft events, hard events and bulk events) categorized by the transverse momentum (�$) of the charged particles. It is observed that the predictions of model, underestimate ALICE data at larger values of �!& while at the low values of �!&, the calculated values of model are close to ALICE data. The predictions at 0.9 TeV explain ALICE data well. At large values of �!&, the models predominantly produce hard events as compared with those perceived from ALICE data. This variance can be observed in the bulk event class, as event generators produce more hard events, whereas experiment gives more soft events. At high multiplicity, the generators underestimate the production of isotropic events. The event generators favor the production of back to back jets (high-�$ jets, low < �$ >) and also generate large multiplicity events.">
0.5 ���/� at √�%% = 0.9 and 7 ���. Two Monte Carlo event generators have been used for current analysis, and the predictions of the model are compared to the results coming from the ALICE experiment based at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). A detailed analysis has been carried out for three types of events (soft events, hard events and bulk events) categorized by the transverse momentum (�$) of the charged particles. It is observed that the predictions of model, underestimate ALICE data at larger values of �!& while at the low values of �!&, the calculated values of model are close to ALICE data. The predictions at 0.9 TeV explain ALICE data well. At large values of �!&, the models predominantly produce hard events as compared with those perceived from ALICE data. This variance can be observed in the bulk event class, as event generators produce more hard events, whereas experiment gives more soft events. At high multiplicity, the generators underestimate the production of isotropic events. The event generators favor the production of back to back jets (high-�$ jets, low < �$ >) and also generate large multiplicity events. ">
Ulaşmaya çalıştığınız dergi veri tabanımızda bulunmamaktadır. Detaylı bilgi için lütfen editörle iletişime geçiniz, acarindex@gmail.com