İnci KAHYAOĞLU, Oya ALDEMİR, Runa ÖZELÇİ, Özlem MORALOĞLU TEKİN, Berna DİLBAZ, Enis ÖZKAYA, Serdar DİLBAZ

3310

The impact of different etiologies of diminished ovarian reserve on pregnancy outcome in IVF-ET cycles

The impact of different etiologies of diminished ovarian reserve on pregnancy outcome in IVF-ET cycles

Background/aim: Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) represents a major challenge in reproductive medicine, as it is often associatedwith poor ovarian stimulation response, high cycle cancellation rate, and low pregnancy rate. The aim of the present study is to comparethe clinical pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) cycles in patients with different DORetiologies.Materials and methods: Patient data were recorded with a computer-based program called Success Estimation Using a RankingAlgorithm (SERA). Overall, 459 patients were divided into 3 groups according to their DOR etiologies (Group A: idiopathic, n = 81;Group B: age-related, n = 294; Group C: previous ovarian surgery, n = 84).Results: Out of 459 stimulation cycles, 378 (82.4%) reached the oocyte retrieval stage, while 201 (43.8%) had embryo transfers. Therewas no significant difference between the patients with different DOR etiologies in terms of embryo transfer and cycle cancellation rate.The patients who had embryo transfer were 44 (52.4%) in Group A, 38 (46.9%) in Group B, and 119 (40.5%) in Group C. There were nosignificant differences between the three groups (P = 0.114). The percentages of women who had oocyte retrieval were 84.5% in GroupA, 70% in Group B, and 80.3% in Group C (P = 0.104). While clinical pregnancy per transfer was 35.8% in Group A, 19.8% in Group B,and 29.5% in Group C, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P = 0.113).Conclusion: Although ovulation induction and ICSI-ET outcomes, including clinical pregnancy and live birth rates, were notsignificantly different with regards to the etiology of DOR, young women with DOR may benefit from assisted reproductive techniques.
PDF

___

  • 1. Cohen J, Chabbert-Buffet N, Darai E. Diminished ovarian reserve, premature ovarian failure, poor ovarian responder—a plea for universal definitions. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2015; 32: 1709-1712.
  • 2. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser JM, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G et al. ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Human Reproduction 2011; 26 (7): 1616-1624.
  • 3. Humaidan P, Alviggi C, Fischer R, Esteves SC. The novel POSEIDON stratification of ‘Low prognosis patients in Assisted Reproductive Technology’ and its proposed marker of successful outcome. F1000Research 2016, 5: 2911.
  • 4. Yun BH, Kim G, Park SH, Noe EB, Seo SK et al. In vitro fertilization outcome in women with diminished ovarian reserve. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science 2017; 60 (1): 46-52.
  • 5. Roustan A, Perrin J, Debals-Gonthier M, Paulmyer-Lacroix O, Agostini A et al. Surgical diminished ovarian reserve after endometrioma cystectomy versus idiopathic DOR: comparison of in vitro fertilization outcome. Human Reproduction 2015; 30 (4): 840-847.
  • 6. Güvenir HA, Misirli G, Dilbaz S, Ozdegirmenci O, Demir B et al. Estimating the chance of success in IVF treatment using a ranking algorithm. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 2015; 53 (9): 911-920.
  • 7. Kumbak B, Oral E, Kahraman S, Karlikaya G, Karagozoglu H. Young patients with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing assisted reproductive treatments: a preliminary report. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2005; 11 (3): 294-299.
  • 8. Papathanasiou A, Searle BJ, King NM, Bhattacharya S. Trends in ‘poor responder’ research: lessons learned from RCTs in assisted conception. Human Reproduction Update 2016; 22 (3): 306-319.
  • 9. Esinler D, Boynukalın FK, Esinler İ, Aksu T. Comparison of controlled ovarian stimulation protocols on IVF outcome in normal and poor responders. Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine 2016; 19 (3): 165-170.
  • 10. Akande VA, Fleming CF, Hunt LP, Keay SD, Jenkins JM. Biological versus chronological ageing of oocytes, distinguishable by raised FSH levels in relation to the success of IVF treatment. Human Reproduction 2002; 17: 2003-2008.
  • 11. El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Hart R, Taylor A, Braude P. Young age does not protect against the adverse effects of reduced ovarian reserve – an eight year study. Human Reproduction 2002; 17: 1519-1524.
  • 12. Abdalla H, Thum MY. An elevated basal FSH reflects a quantitative rather that qualitative decline of the ovarian reserve. Human Reproduction 2004; 19: 893-898.
  • 13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice and Practice Committee. Female age related fertility decline. Committee Opinion No. 589. Fertility and Sterility 2004; 101 (3): 633-634.
  • 14. Mutlu MF, Erdem M, Erdem A, Yıldız S, Mutlu I et al. Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-Mullerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2013; 30 (5): 657-665.
  • 15. Nelson SM, Telfer EE, Anderson RA. The ageing ovary and uterus: new biological insights. Human Reproduction Update 2013; 19 (1): 67-83.
  • 16. Yih MC, Spandorfer SD, Rosenwaks Z. Egg production predicts a doubling of in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates even within defined age and ovarian reserve categories. Fertility and Sterility 2005; 83: 24-29.
  • 17. Timeva T, Milachich T, Antonova I, Arabaji T, Shterev A et al. Correlation between number of retrieved oocytes and pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm infection. Scientific World Journal 2006; 6: 686-690.
  • 18. van der Gaast MH, Eijkemans MJ, van der Net JB, de Boer EJ, Burger CW et al. Optimum number of oocytes for a successful first IVF treatment cycle. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2006; 13: 476-480.
  • 19. Silber SJ, Nagy Z, Devroey P, Camus M, Van Steirteghem AC. The effect of female age and ovarian reserve on pregnancy rate in male infertility: treatment of azoospermia with sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Human Reproduction 1997; 12: 2693-2700.
  • 20. Guler I, Erdem A, Oguz Y, Cevher F, Mutlu MF et al. The impact of laparoscopic surgery of peritoneal endometriosis and endometrioma on the outcome of ICSI cycles. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine 2017; 63 (5): 324-330.
  • 21. Somigliana E, Arnoldi M, Benaglia L, Iemmello R, Nicolosi AE et al. IVF-ICSI outcome in women operated on for bilateral endometriomas. Human Reproduction 2008; 23: 1526-1530.
  • 22. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Al-Inany HG, Aboulghar MM. The outcome of in vitro fertilization in advanced endometriosis with previous surgery: a case-controlled study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003; 188: 371-375.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Nurten Gizem TORE, Mesken GÜMÜŞSOY, Deran OSKAY

Nalan OGAN, Yusuf AYDEMİR, Togay EVRİN, Gökçe Kaan ATAÇ, Ayşe BAHA, Burak KATİPOĞLU, Banu SÜZEN, Evrim Eylem AKPINAR

Büşra TEZCAN, Demet BÖLÜKBAŞI, Alev ŞAYLAN, Sema TURAN, Sultan Sevim YAKIN, Dilek KAZANCI, Ayşegül ÖZGÖK, Hija YAZICIOĞLU

Ferhan KERGET, Zülal ÖZKURT, Nurinnisa ÖZTÜRK, Sinan YILMAZ

Zeliha Güzelöz ÇAPAR, Lütfiye Zümre Arican ALICIKUŞ, Nesrin AKTÜRK, Merih Güray DURAK, Ali İbrahim SEVİNÇ, Pinar BALCI, İlknur GÖRKEN

Zehra Sema ÖZKAN

Zhi-hua ZHANG, Yi-xuan DING, Yu-duo WU, Chong-chong GAO, Fei LI

Pinar Gür ÇETİNKAYA, Ümit Murat ŞAHİNER

Runa OZELCI, Oya ALDEMİR, Serdar DİLBAZ, Enis ÖZKAYA, İnci KAHYAOĞLU, Berna DİLBAZ, Özlem Moraloğlu TEKİN

The efficiency of low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin plus nucleos(t)ide analogs in preventing posttransplant hepatitis B virus recurrence

Murat ZEYTUNLU, Sezgin VATANSEVER, Murat KILIÇ, Rasim FARAJOV, Hüseyin Cahit YILMAZ