The efficacy of in situ local autograft in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a comparison of three different grafting methods

The efficacy of in situ local autograft in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a comparison of three different grafting methods

Background/aim: This study was performed to show the efficacy of in situ local autograft with a comparison of in situ local autograft, local autograft with allograft, and local autograft with posterior iliac crest autograft. Materials and methods: In this prospective randomized study, a total of 65 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients were separated into 3 groups: Group 1 using local autograft and allograft, Group 2 using local autograft only, and Group 3 using local autograft and posterior iliac crest autograft. Posterior segmental instrumentation was also applied to all patients. The mean follow-up period was 28.5 months (range, 15 40 months). Pseudarthrosis was investigated with the multiplanar and three-dimensional images obtained using multislice computed tomography, thoracolumbar bone single-photon emission computed tomography, and three-phase regional and whole body bone scintigraphy. Results: Pseudarthrosis was not observed in any patient. Fusion was obtained in all patients at the end of the follow-up periods. Conclusion: Similar results were obtained in respect of fusion in all 3 groups. Without the use of additional grafts, sufficient fusion can be achieved with the use of local autograft alone for posterior spinal fusion in patients with AIS.

___

  • 1. Hibbs RA. An operation for progressive spinal deformities: a preliminary report of three cases from the service of the orthopaedic hospital. New York Medical Journal 1911; 93: 1013.
  • 2. Albee FH. Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for Pott’s disease: a preliminary report. JAMA 1911; 57: 885.
  • 3. Price CT, Connolly JF, Carantzas AC. Comparison of bone grafts for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003; 28: 793-798.
  • 4. Violas P, Chapuis M, Bracq H. Local autograft bone in the surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004; 29: 189-192.
  • 5. Betz RR, Petrizzo AM, Kerner PJ, Falatyn SP, Clements DH, Huss GK. Allograft versus no graft with a posterior multisegmented hook system for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006; 31: 121-127.
  • 6. Betz RR, Lavelle WF, Samdani AF. Bone grafting options in children. Spine 2010; 35: 1648-1654.
  • 7. Dawson EG, Clader TJ, Bassett LW. A comparison of different methods to diagnose pseudarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67; 1153-1159.
  • 8. Bridwell KH, O’Brien MF, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K. Posterior spinal fusion supplemented with only allograft bone in paralytic scoliosis. Does it work? Spine 1994; 19; 2658-2666.
  • 9. Galler RM, Sonntag VKH. Bone Graft Harvest. Barrow Quarterly 2003; 19; 4.
  • 10. Moe JH. A critical analysis of methods of fusion for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958; 40: 529-554.
  • 11. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS. Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity: a statistical evaluation. Spine 1995; 20: 1055-1060.
  • 12. Fernyhough JC, Schimandle JJ, Weigel MC, Edwards CC, Levine AM. Chronic donor site pain complicating bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest for spinal fusion. Spine 1992; 17: 1474-1480.
  • 13. Robertson PA, Wray AC. Natural history of posterior iliac crest bone graft donation for spinal surgery: a prospective analysis of morbidity. Spine 2001; 26: 1473-1476.
  • 14. Blanco JS, Sears CJ. Allograft bone use during instrumentation and fusion in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1997; 22: 1338-1342.
  • 15. Knapp DR Jr, Jones ET. Use of cortical cancellous allograft for posterior spinal fusion. Clin Orthop 1988; 229: 99-106.
  • 16. Dodd CAF, Fergusson CM, Freedman L, Houghton GR, Thomas D. Allograft versus autograft bone in scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70: 431-434.
  • 17. Fabry G. Allograft versus autograft bone in idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a multivariate statistical analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 1991; 11: 465-468.
  • 18. Montgomery DM, Aronson DD, Lee CL, LaMont RL. Posterior spinal fusion: allograft versus autograft bone. J Spinal Disord 1990; 3: 370-375.
  • 19. An HS, Lynch K, Toth J. Prospective comparison of autograft vs. allograft for adult posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: differences among freeze-dried, frozen, and mixed grafts. J Spinal Disord 1995; 8: 131-135.
  • 20. Nugent PJ, Dawson EG. Intertransverse process lumbar fusion with allogeneic fresh frozen bone graft. Clin Orthop 1993; 287: 107-111.
  • 21. West JL, Ogilvie JW, Bradford DS. Pedicle screw-plate fixation with allograft bone. Orthop Trans 1993; 17: 13.
  • 22. Butterman GR, Glazer PA, Bradford DS. The use of bone allografts in the spine. Clin Orthop 1996; 324: 75-85.
  • 23. Gazdag AR, Lane JM, Glaser D, Forster RA. Alternatives to bone graft: efficacy and indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995; 3: 1-8.
  • 24. Aaron AD, Wiedel JD. Review: Allograft use in orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics 1994; 17: 41-48.
  • 25. Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Bone banking update on methods and materials. Orthop Clin North Am 1999; 30: 565-570.
  • 26. Boyce T, Edwards J, Scarborough N. Allograft bone: the influence of processing on safety and performance. Ortho Clin North Am 1999; 30: 571-581.
  • 27. Raizman NM, O’Brien JR, Poehling-Monaghan KL, Yu WD. Pseudarthrosis of the Spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009; 17: 494-503.
  • 28. Albers HW, Hresko MT, Carlson J, Hall JE. Comparison of single- and dual-rod techniques for posterior spinal instrumentation in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2000; 25: 1944-1949.
  • 29. Goldstein LA. The surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop 1973; 93: 131-157.
  • 30. Lauerman WC, Bradford DS, Transfeldt EE, Ogilvie JW. Management of pseudarthrosis after arthrodesis of the spine for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 222- 236.
  • 31. Leider LL Jr, Moe JH, Winter RB. Early ambulation after surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55: 1003-1015.
  • 32. Moe JH. Complications of treatment. In: Bradford D, editor. Textbook of Scoliosis and Other Spinal Deformities. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: WB Saunders; 1995.
  • 33. Shea KG, Stevens PM, Nelson M, Smith JT, Masters KS, Yandow S. A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement: intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine 1998; 23: 551-555.
  • 34. Selby MD, Clark SR, Hall DJ, Freeman BJC. Radiologic assessment of spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012; 20: 694-703.
  • 35. Cook SD, Patron LP, Christakis PM, Bailey KJ, Banta C, Glazer PA. Comparison of methods for determining the presence and extent of anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2004; 29: 1118-1123.
  • 36. Buchowski JM, Liu G, Bunmaprasert T, Rose PS, Riew KD. Anterior cervical fusion assessment: Surgical exploration versus radiographic evaluation. Spine 2008; 33: 1185-1191.
  • 37. Santos ER, Goss DG, Morcom RK, Fraser RD. Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages. Spine 2003; 28: 997-1001.
  • 38. Pai VS, Hodgson B. Assessment of bony union following surgical stabilisation for lumbar spondylolysis: a comparative study between radiography and computed tomography. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2006; 14: 17-20.
  • 39. Kataoka ML, Hochman MG, Rodriguez EK, Lin PJ, Kubo S, Raptopolous VD. A review of factors that affect artifact from metallic hardware on multi-row detector computed tomography. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2010; 39: 125-136.
  • 40. Gates GF, McDonald RJ. Bone SPECT of the back after lumbar surgery. Clinical Nuclear Medicine 1999; 24: 395-403.
  • 41. Guidera KJ, Hooten J, Weatherly W, Highhouse M, Castellvi A, Ogden JA, Pugh L, Cook S. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Results in 52 patients. Spine 1993; 19: 427-431.
  • 42. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, Baldus C, Weston J. Radiographic results of arthrodesis with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a five to ten year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 807-814.
  • 43. Bridwell KH, McAllister JW, Betz RR, Huss G, Clancy M, Schoeneker PL. Coronal decompansation produced by CotrelDoubousset derotation maneuver for idiopathic right thoracic scoliosis. Spine 1991; 16: 769-777.