The efficacy of in situ local autograft in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a comparison of three different grafting methods

The efficacy of in situ local autograft in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a comparison of three different grafting methods

Background/aim: This study was performed to show the efficacy of in situ local autograft with a comparison of in situ local autograft, local autograft with allograft, and local autograft with posterior iliac crest autograft. Materials and methods: In this prospective randomized study, a total of 65 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients were separated into 3 groups: Group 1 using local autograft and allograft, Group 2 using local autograft only, and Group 3 using local autograft and posterior iliac crest autograft. Posterior segmental instrumentation was also applied to all patients. The mean follow-up period was 28.5 months (range, 15 40 months). Pseudarthrosis was investigated with the multiplanar and three-dimensional images obtained using multislice computed tomography, thoracolumbar bone single-photon emission computed tomography, and three-phase regional and whole body bone scintigraphy. Results: Pseudarthrosis was not observed in any patient. Fusion was obtained in all patients at the end of the follow-up periods. Conclusion: Similar results were obtained in respect of fusion in all 3 groups. Without the use of additional grafts, sufficient fusion can be achieved with the use of local autograft alone for posterior spinal fusion in patients with AIS.

___

  • 1. Hibbs RA. An operation for progressive spinal deformities: a preliminary report of three cases from the service of the orthopaedic hospital. New York Medical Journal 1911; 93: 1013.
  • 2. Albee FH. Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for Pott’s disease: a preliminary report. JAMA 1911; 57: 885.
  • 3. Price CT, Connolly JF, Carantzas AC. Comparison of bone grafts for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003; 28: 793-798.
  • 4. Violas P, Chapuis M, Bracq H. Local autograft bone in the surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004; 29: 189-192.
  • 5. Betz RR, Petrizzo AM, Kerner PJ, Falatyn SP, Clements DH, Huss GK. Allograft versus no graft with a posterior multisegmented hook system for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006; 31: 121-127.
  • 6. Betz RR, Lavelle WF, Samdani AF. Bone grafting options in children. Spine 2010; 35: 1648-1654.
  • 7. Dawson EG, Clader TJ, Bassett LW. A comparison of different methods to diagnose pseudarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67; 1153-1159.
  • 8. Bridwell KH, O’Brien MF, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K. Posterior spinal fusion supplemented with only allograft bone in paralytic scoliosis. Does it work? Spine 1994; 19; 2658-2666.
  • 9. Galler RM, Sonntag VKH. Bone Graft Harvest. Barrow Quarterly 2003; 19; 4.
  • 10. Moe JH. A critical analysis of methods of fusion for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958; 40: 529-554.
  • 11. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS. Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity: a statistical evaluation. Spine 1995; 20: 1055-1060.
  • 12. Fernyhough JC, Schimandle JJ, Weigel MC, Edwards CC, Levine AM. Chronic donor site pain complicating bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest for spinal fusion. Spine 1992; 17: 1474-1480.
  • 13. Robertson PA, Wray AC. Natural history of posterior iliac crest bone graft donation for spinal surgery: a prospective analysis of morbidity. Spine 2001; 26: 1473-1476.
  • 14. Blanco JS, Sears CJ. Allograft bone use during instrumentation and fusion in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1997; 22: 1338-1342.
  • 15. Knapp DR Jr, Jones ET. Use of cortical cancellous allograft for posterior spinal fusion. Clin Orthop 1988; 229: 99-106.
  • 16. Dodd CAF, Fergusson CM, Freedman L, Houghton GR, Thomas D. Allograft versus autograft bone in scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70: 431-434.
  • 17. Fabry G. Allograft versus autograft bone in idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a multivariate statistical analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 1991; 11: 465-468.
  • 18. Montgomery DM, Aronson DD, Lee CL, LaMont RL. Posterior spinal fusion: allograft versus autograft bone. J Spinal Disord 1990; 3: 370-375.
  • 19. An HS, Lynch K, Toth J. Prospective comparison of autograft vs. allograft for adult posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: differences among freeze-dried, frozen, and mixed grafts. J Spinal Disord 1995; 8: 131-135.
  • 20. Nugent PJ, Dawson EG. Intertransverse process lumbar fusion with allogeneic fresh frozen bone graft. Clin Orthop 1993; 287: 107-111.
  • 21. West JL, Ogilvie JW, Bradford DS. Pedicle screw-plate fixation with allograft bone. Orthop Trans 1993; 17: 13.
  • 22. Butterman GR, Glazer PA, Bradford DS. The use of bone allografts in the spine. Clin Orthop 1996; 324: 75-85.
  • 23. Gazdag AR, Lane JM, Glaser D, Forster RA. Alternatives to bone graft: efficacy and indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995; 3: 1-8.
  • 24. Aaron AD, Wiedel JD. Review: Allograft use in orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics 1994; 17: 41-48.
  • 25. Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Bone banking update on methods and materials. Orthop Clin North Am 1999; 30: 565-570.
  • 26. Boyce T, Edwards J, Scarborough N. Allograft bone: the influence of processing on safety and performance. Ortho Clin North Am 1999; 30: 571-581.
  • 27. Raizman NM, O’Brien JR, Poehling-Monaghan KL, Yu WD. Pseudarthrosis of the Spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009; 17: 494-503.
  • 28. Albers HW, Hresko MT, Carlson J, Hall JE. Comparison of single- and dual-rod techniques for posterior spinal instrumentation in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2000; 25: 1944-1949.
  • 29. Goldstein LA. The surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop 1973; 93: 131-157.
  • 30. Lauerman WC, Bradford DS, Transfeldt EE, Ogilvie JW. Management of pseudarthrosis after arthrodesis of the spine for idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73: 222- 236.
  • 31. Leider LL Jr, Moe JH, Winter RB. Early ambulation after surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55: 1003-1015.
  • 32. Moe JH. Complications of treatment. In: Bradford D, editor. Textbook of Scoliosis and Other Spinal Deformities. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: WB Saunders; 1995.
  • 33. Shea KG, Stevens PM, Nelson M, Smith JT, Masters KS, Yandow S. A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement: intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine 1998; 23: 551-555.
  • 34. Selby MD, Clark SR, Hall DJ, Freeman BJC. Radiologic assessment of spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012; 20: 694-703.
  • 35. Cook SD, Patron LP, Christakis PM, Bailey KJ, Banta C, Glazer PA. Comparison of methods for determining the presence and extent of anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2004; 29: 1118-1123.
  • 36. Buchowski JM, Liu G, Bunmaprasert T, Rose PS, Riew KD. Anterior cervical fusion assessment: Surgical exploration versus radiographic evaluation. Spine 2008; 33: 1185-1191.
  • 37. Santos ER, Goss DG, Morcom RK, Fraser RD. Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages. Spine 2003; 28: 997-1001.
  • 38. Pai VS, Hodgson B. Assessment of bony union following surgical stabilisation for lumbar spondylolysis: a comparative study between radiography and computed tomography. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2006; 14: 17-20.
  • 39. Kataoka ML, Hochman MG, Rodriguez EK, Lin PJ, Kubo S, Raptopolous VD. A review of factors that affect artifact from metallic hardware on multi-row detector computed tomography. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2010; 39: 125-136.
  • 40. Gates GF, McDonald RJ. Bone SPECT of the back after lumbar surgery. Clinical Nuclear Medicine 1999; 24: 395-403.
  • 41. Guidera KJ, Hooten J, Weatherly W, Highhouse M, Castellvi A, Ogden JA, Pugh L, Cook S. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Results in 52 patients. Spine 1993; 19: 427-431.
  • 42. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, Baldus C, Weston J. Radiographic results of arthrodesis with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a five to ten year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 807-814.
  • 43. Bridwell KH, McAllister JW, Betz RR, Huss G, Clancy M, Schoeneker PL. Coronal decompansation produced by CotrelDoubousset derotation maneuver for idiopathic right thoracic scoliosis. Spine 1991; 16: 769-777.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: 6
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Bekir UÇAN, Mustafa ÖZBEK, Mustafa ŞAHİN, Muhammed KIZILGÜL, Erman ÇAKAL

Effects of n-acetylcysteine on ovarian tissue autografted intogranulation tissue compared to back muscle in rats

Masoumeh ZIRAK JAVANMARD, Mojtaba KARIMIPOUR, Bagher POURHEYDAR, Farideh DANESHPOYA

An examination of healthcare-associated infections in elderly patients

Gürdal YILMAZ, Serap İSKENDER, İftihar KÖKSAL

Concordance of immunohistochemistry between core needle biopsy and surgical resection of breast cancer

Handan KAYA, İdris ÖNEM, Erkin ARIBAL, Hülya ŞAHİN, Onur BUĞDAYCI, Hande MOLLAMEMİŞOĞLU, Faruk Erdem KOMBAK

Molecular analysis and prevalence of Huntington disease in northwestern Iran

Parisa AOB, Mahmoud SHEKARI KHANIANI, Mohammadreza RANJOURI, Sima MANSOORI DERAKHSHAN

Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network head injuryprediction rules: on the basis of cost and effectiveness

Erdem FATİHOĞLU, Pınar Nercis KOŞAR, Sonay AYDIN, Fatma Dilek GÖKHARMAN

The relationship between the Trendelenburg position and cerebral hypoxia inpatients who have undergone robot-assisted hysterectomy and prostatectomy

Işık ALPER, Ali ÖZGÜN, Asuman SARGIN, Semra KARAMAN, İlkben GÜNÜŞEN, Fatma Zekiye AŞKAR

Superiorly based nasolabial island flap for reconstruction of the lateral lower eyelid

Yalçın Yontar, Selahattin ÖZMEN, Sedat TATAR

Alper DİLCİ, Nuray VAROL, İlker KILIÇCIOĞLU, Ece KONAC, Utku AYDİL, Yusuf KIZIL, Süleyman Sabri USLU

Hamed HASSANI, Alireza KHOSHDEL, Seyed Reza SHARIFZADEH, Mohammad Foad HEYDARI, Shaban ALIZADEH, Ali Noroozi AGHIDEH