The effects of different suture techniques on wound healing in abdomibnal wall closure

The effects of different suture techniques on wound healing in abdomibnal wall closure

The effects of different suture techniques on wound healing in abdomibnal wall closure

___

  • 1. Tito WA, Sarr MG. Intestinal obstruction. In Zuidema GD, Ed. Surgery of the alimentary tract. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1996: Vol: V, p. 375-416.
  • 2. Deveney E. Hernias and other lesions of the abdominal wall. Lawrence W. Way Ed. In: Current Surgical Diagnosis & Treatment. Appleton Lange, Connecticut. 1994; p. 712-724.
  • 3. Mulvihill SJ, Pellegrini CA. Postoperative complications. Lawrence W. Way Ed. In: Current Surgical Diagnosis & Treatment. Appleton Lange. Connecticut, 1994: p. 24-29.
  • 4. Savunen TJA, Viljanto JA. Prediction of wound tension strength: An experimental study. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 401-3.
  • 5. Bergman I, Loxley R. Two improved and simplified methods for the spectrophotometric determination of hydroxyproline. Anal Chem 1970; 35: 1961-5.
  • 6. Granat M, Tur-Kaspa I, Zylber-Katz E, Schenker JG. Reduction of peritoneal adhesion formation by colchicine: a comparative study in the rat. Fertility and Sterility 1983; 40: 369-72.
  • 7. Cohen JK, Diegelmann RF, Crossland MC. Wound care and wound healing. Seymour I Schwartz Ed. In Principles of Surgery. McGraw-Hill, Philadelphia. 1994: p. 279-303.
  • 8. Wantz GE. Abdominal wall hernias. Seymour I Schwartz Ed. In Principles of Surgery. McGraw-Hill,Philadelphia. 1994: p. 1517-1543.
  • 9. Read RC, Yoder G. Recent trends in the management of incisional herniation. Arch Surg 1989; 124: 485-488.
  • 10. Barbul A, Purtill WA. Nutrition in wound healing. Clinics in Dermatology. 1994; 12: 133-140.
  • 11. Skalli O, Gabbiani G. The biology of the myofibroblast relationship to wound contraction and fibroconnective diseases. Clark RAF and Henson PM Eds. In: The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair. Plenium Publication, New York. 1988: p. 373- 385.
  • 12. Ryan GB. Myofibroblast in human granulation tissue. Hum Pathol. 1974; 5: 55-65.
  • 13. Bergman I, Loxley R. The determination of hydroxyproline in urine hydrolisates. Clin Chim Acta. 1970; 27: 347-349.
  • 14. Brown GL, Curtsinger LJ, White M. Acceleration of tensile strength of incisions treated with EGF and TGFbeta. Ann Surg. 1988; 208: 788-794.
  • 15. Waldorf H, Fewkes J. Wound healing. Advances in Dermatology. 1995;10: 77-96.
  • 16. McWay CB. The abdomen. Surgical Anatomy. WB Saunders, Philadelphia. 1984: p. 488-498.
  • 17. Moreno A, Aguayo JL, Zambudio G, Ramirez P, Canteras M, Parrilla P. Influence of abdominal incision on the formation of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: An experimental study in rats. Eur J Surg 1996; 162: 181-5.
  • 18. Ellis H. Wound repair-reaction of the peritoneum to injury. Ann R Coll Surg 1978; 60: 219-21.
  • 19. Christen D, Buchmann P. Peritoneal adhesions after laparotomy: prophylactic measures. Hepato- Gastroenterol 1991; 38: 283-6.
  • 21. AkyŸrek N, Tercan M. An experimental study on the etiology of adhesion formation. Turk J Med Res 1994; 12: 97-102.