The effectiveness of a back school program in lower limb amputees: a randomized controlled study

The effectiveness of a back school program in lower limb amputees: a randomized controlled study

Background/aim: A few studies have been carried out in lower limb amputees (LLAs) and they examined the incidence of and reasons for low back pain. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a back school program in LLAs with mechanical low back pain (MLBP). Materials and methods: Forty male unilateral transfemoral amputees with MLBP were randomly allocated into two groups. A back school program was applied to Group 1 over 2 weeks. A booklet for home use was given to each participant in Group 2. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Spinal flexibility measurements were obtained. For the assessment of back pain-related disability, the Oswestry Disability Index was used. Patients were assessed at baseline, at month 1, and at month 3. Results: At the month 1 assessment, a reduction in pain intensity and disability, and increase in spinal flexibility measurements were detected in Group 1 only (P < 0.05). At the month 3 assessment, there were improvements in all measured parameters in both groups (P < 0.05). Group 1 had better results in all parameters compared with Group 2. Conclusion: The back school program, combined with an exercise program, decreased pain and disability and improved the spinal flexibility significantly in LLAs with MLBP

___

  • 1. Smith DG, Ehde DM, Legro MW. Phantom limb, residual limb and back pain after lower extremity amputations. Clin Ortho 1999; 361: 29-38.
  • 2. Ehde DM, Czerniecki JM, Smith DG. Chronic phantom sensations, phantom pain, residual limb pain, and other regional pain after lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1039-1044.
  • 3. Ehde DM, Smith DG, Czerniecki JM. Back pain as a secondary disability in persons with lower limb amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 731-734.
  • 4. Ephraim PL, Wegener ST, MacKenzie EJ. Phantom pain, residual limb pain, and back pain in amputees: results of a national survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1910-1919.
  • 5. Kulkarni J, Gaine WJ, Buckley JG. Chronic low back pain in traumatic lower limb amputees. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 81-86.
  • 6. Smith C, Comiskey NR. Prevalence and patterns of back pain and residual limb pain in lower limb amputees at the National Rehabilitation Hospital. Ir J Med Sci 2008; 177: 53-57.
  • 7. Friel K, Domholdt E, Smith DG. Physical and functional measures related to low back pain in individuals with lowerlimb amputation: an exploratory pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42: 155-166.
  • 8. Stam HJ, Dommisse AMV, Bussmann HBJ. Prevalence of low back pain after transfemorral amputation related to physical activity and other prosthesis-related parameters. Disab Rehab 2004; 26: 794-797.
  • 9. O’Sullivan P. Diagnosis and classification of chronic low back pain disorders: maladaptive movement and motor control impairments as underlying mechanism. Manual Ther 2005; 10: 242-255.
  • 10. Esquenazi A, DiGiacomo R. Rehabilitation after amputation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2001; 91: 13-22.
  • 11. Henchoz Y, Pinget C, Wasserfallen JB. Cost utility analysis of a three-month exercise programme vs usual care following multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 846-852.
  • 12. Ferreira ML, Smeets RJ, Kamper SJ. Can we explain heterogeneity among randomized clinical trials of exercise for chronic back pain? A meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 1383-1403.
  • 13. Pengel LH, Refshauge KM, Maher CG. Physiotherapistdirected exercise, advice, or both for subacute low back pain: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 787-796.
  • 14. Tavafian SS, Jamshid AR, Montazeri A. A randomized study of back school in women with chronic low back pain: quality of life at three, six, and twelve months follow-up. Spine 2008; 33: 1617-1621.
  • 15. Yang EJ, Park WB, Shin HI. The effect of back school integrated with core strengthening in patients with chronic low-back pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 89: 744-754.
  • 16. Heymans MW, van Tulder MW, Esmail R. Back schools for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 2005; 30: 2153-2163.
  • 17. Donzelli S, Di Domenica F, Cova AM. Two different techniques in the rehabilitation treatment of low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eura Medicophys 2006; 42: 205-210.
  • 18. Garcia AN, Costa LCM, da Silva TM. Effectiveness of back school versus McKenzie exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Physical Therapy 2013; 93: 729-748.
  • 19. Magalhaes MO, França FJ, Burke TN. Efficacy of graded activity versus supervised exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2013; 14: 36.
  • 20. May BJ. Amputation and Prosthetics: A Case Study. Approach. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Davis; 2002.
  • 21. Lamari N, Marino LC, Cordeiro JA. Trunk anterior flexibility in adolescents after height growth speed peak. Acta Ortop Bras 2007; 15: 25-29.
  • 22. Otman S, Demirel H, Sade A. Tedavi Hareketlerinde Temel Degerlendirme Prensipleri. 6th ed. Ankara, Turkey: Pelikan Yayınevi; 2013 (in Turkish).
  • 23. Jones MA, Stratton G, Reilly T, Unnithan VB. Measurement error associated with spinal mobility measures in children with and without low-back pain. Acta Paediatr 2002; 91: 1339-1343.
  • 24. Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000; 25: 2940-2953.
  • 25. Yakut E, Duger T, Oksuz C. Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Spine 2004; 29: 581-585.
  • 26. Nourbakhsh MR, Massoud A. Relationship between mechanical factors and incidence of low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2002; 32: 447-460.
  • 27. Kuukkanen T, Malkia E. Effects of a three-month therapeutic exercise programme on flexibility in subjects with low-back pain. Physi Res Int 2000; 5: 46-61.
  • 28. Hammarlund CS, Carlstro M, Melchior R. Prevalence of back pain, its effect on functional ability and health-related quality of life in lower limb amputees secondary to trauma or tumour: a comparison across three levels of amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011; 35: 97-105.
  • 29. Deyo R, Walsh N, Martin D. A controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (tens) and exercise for chronic low back pain. N Eng J Med 1990; 322: 1627-1634.
  • 30. Manniche C, Bentzen L, Hesselsoe G. Clinical trial for intensive muscle training for chronic low back pain. Lancet 1988; 2: 1473-1476.
  • 31. Klaber Moffet JA, Chase SM, Parker I. A controlled prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a back school in the relief of chronic low back pain. Spine 1986; 11: 120-122.
  • 32. Hodselmans AP, Jaegers SM, Göeken LN. Short-term outcomes of a back school program for chronic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 1099-1105.