Birgül PİYAL, Recep AKDUR, Mustafa Soner YILMAZ

Social support and quality of life in a group of cancer patients (Ankara, Turkey)*

Background/aim: Cancer has become an important public health challenge all around the world. Though the demographic and clinical features of cancer patients are well documented in Turkey, the establishment of social support networks has been somewhat neglected. The aim of the study was to assess cancer patients perceived social support and quality of life characteristics. Materials and methods: The Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale, European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, and Turkish version of the EUROHIS measurements were obtained from the study group. Associations between the scores and sociodemographic variables of the patients were evaluated. Determination of the best predictors that affect social support perception scores was performed by multiple linear regression analysis. Results: A total of 364 patients (217 females, 147 males) were analyzed. Regarding the mean scores of perceived social support, statistically significant differences were found between education, perceived economic status, and ECOG groups (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The best predictors that have an effect on perceived social support need to be studied in depth with further research.

PDF

___

1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015; 136: E359-386.
2. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Latest World Cancer Statistics. Press Release No: 223. Lyon, France: IARC; 2013.
3. Stillman FA, Kaufman MR, Kibria N, Eser S, Spires M, Pustu Y. Cancer registries in four provinces in Turkey: a case study. Global Health 2012, 8: 34.
4. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. Health Statistics Yearbook 2013. Ankara, Turkey: Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health General Directorate of Health Research; 2014.
5. Nakaya N, Kogure M, Saito-Nakaya K, Tomata Y, Sone T, Kakizaki M, Tsuji I. The association between self-reported history of physical diseases and psychological distress in a community-dwelling Japanese population: the Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study. Eur J Pub Health 2014; 24: 45-49.
6. Uchino BN. Social support and health. A review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. J Behav Med 2006; 29: 377-387.
7. Ekbäck M, Benzein E, Lindberg M, Årestedt K. The Swedish version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) a psychometric evaluation study in women with hirsutism and nursing students. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013, 11: 168.
8. Uchino BN, Bowen K, Carlisle M, Birmingham W. Psychological pathways linking social support to health outcomes: a visit with the ghosts of research past, present, and future. Soc Sci Med 2012, 7: 947-957.
9. Eker D, Arkar H, Yaldız H. Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of revised form of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry 2001; 12: 17-25.
10. EORTC Quality of Life Department. EORTC QLQ-C30, Version 3. Brussels, Belgium: EORTC; 1995.
11. Guzelant A, Goksel T, Ozkok S, Tasbakan S, Aysan T, Bottomley A. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: an examination into the cultural validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur J Cancer Care 2004;13: 135-144.
12. Eser E, Lağarlı T, Baydur H, Akkurt V, Akkuş H, Arslan E, Cengiz E, Çiftçioğlu G, Işık H, Karabacak H et al. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the EUROHIS-Tr (WHOQOL-8-Tr) in a Turkish population. Turkish Journal of Public Health 2010; 8: 136-152 (in Turkish with abstract in English).
13. Saunders CL, Abel GA, Lyratzopoulos G. Inequalities in reported cancer patient experience by socio-demographic characteristic and cancer site: evidence from respondents to the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey. Eur J Cancer Care 2015; 24: 85-98.
14. Kılıçkap S, Erman M, Celik I, Hayran M. Evaluation of association between clinicopathologic characteristics of the disease and quality of life in cancer patients. 2010 ASCO Annual Meeting Abstracts. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: e19650.
15. Pinar G, Okdem S, Buyukgonenc L, Ayhan A. The relationship between social support and the level of anxiety, depression, and quality of life of Turkish women with gynecologic cancer. Cancer Nurs 2012; 35: 229-235.
16. Eom CS, Shin DW, Kim SY, Yang HK, Jo HS, Kweon SS, Kang YS, Kim JH, Cho BL, Park JH. Impact of perceived social support on the mental health and health-related quality of life in cancer patients: results from a nationwide, multicenter survey in South Korea. Psycho-Oncology 2013; 22: 1283-1290.
17. Nausheen B, Carr NJ, Peveler RC, Moss-Morris R, Verrill C, Robbins E, Nugent KP, Baker AM, Judd M, Gidron Y. Relationship between loneliness and proangiogenic cytokines in newly diagnosed tumors of colon and rectum. Psychosom Med 2010; 72: 912-916.