Segmental epidural anesthesia for percutaneous kyphoplasty: comparison with general anesthesia

Segmental epidural anesthesia for percutaneous kyphoplasty: comparison with general anesthesia

Background/aim: This is a feasibility study evaluating whether segmental epidural anesthesia is an alternative anesthetic approach to general anesthesia for percutaneous kyphoplasty. Materials and methods: After ethics committee approval was obtained, 52 ASA class I III patients scheduled for elective, single-level percutaneous kyphoplasty were recruited. The patients were divided into two equal groups. In Group E (Group Epidural) segmental epidural anesthesia was performed using the loss of resistance technique with saline. In Group G (Group Control) general anesthesia was performed. Hemodynamic parameters, intraoperative and postoperative analgesic requirements, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and complications were recorded. Results: Hemodynamics were similar between the two groups. Postoperative analgesic requirement was significantly higher in Group G than in Group E (P < 0.004). VAS scores were significantly lower in Group E than in Group G (P < 0.05). Time to first pain experience at the first postoperative 4 h was significantly longer and length of stay in the PACU was significantly shorter in Group E than in Group G (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Segmental epidural anesthesia is a safe anesthetic technique for percutaneous kyphoplasty. This technique offered advantages over general anesthesia in terms of postoperative analgesia, analgesic consumption, early recovery, and short PACU stay. Therefore, it should be considered a suitable anesthetic technique in patients undergoing single level percutaneous kyphoplasty.

___

  • 1. Luginbuhl M. Percutaneous vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty and lordoplasty: implications for the anesthesiologist. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008; 21: 504-513.
  • 2. Frost EAM, Johnson DM. Anesthetic considerations during vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and intradiscal electrothermal therapy. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2009; 47: 45-55.
  • 3. Sesay M, Tauzin-Fin P, Jeannin A, Vignes JR, Dousset V, Maurette P. Median effective infusion dose (ED50) of alfentanil for monitored anesthesia care of percutaneous vertebroplasty of osteoporotic fractures. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2009; 21: 165-169.
  • 4. Della Puppa A, Andreula C, Frass M. Assisted sedation: a safe and easy method for pain-free percutaneous vertebroplasty. Minerva Anestesiol 2008; 74: 57-62.
  • 5. Lin BF, Huang YS, Kuo CP, Ju DT, Lu CH, Cherng CH, Wu CT. Comparison of A-line autoregressive index and observer assessment of alertness/sedation scale for monitored anesthesia care with target-controlled infusion of propofol in patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2011; 23: 6-11.
  • 6. Mohr M, Pillich D, Kirsch M, Mueller JU, Fleck S, Hosten N, Langner S. Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty with the patient under intravenous analgesia and sedation: a feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 649-653.
  • 7. Brinjikji W, Comstock BA, Gray L, Kallmes DF. Local anesthesia with bupivacaine and lidocaine for vertebral fracture trial (LABEL). A report of outcomes and comparison with the investigational vertebroplasty efficacy and safety trial (INVEST). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 1631-1634.
  • 8. Venmans A, Klazen CA, Lohle PN, van Rooij WJ. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and procedural pain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 830-831.
  • 9. Schofer MD, Illian CH, Illian JB, Kortmann HR. Balloon kyphoplasty for recent vertebral fractures in the elderly. Orthopade 2008; 37: 462-469 (in German).
  • 10. Hannallah M, Gibby E, Watson V. Fluoroscopy-guided, smalldose spinal anesthesia for kyphoplasty: a collaborative effort between the anesthesiologist and interventional radiologist. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1329-1330.
  • 11. Souvatzis X, Katonis PG, Licoudis SA, Marouli DG, Askitopoulou H. Subarachnoid anesthesia for kyphoplasty: is anesthesia adequate? Anesth Analg 2010; 111: 238-240.
  • 12. Aldrete JA. The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 89-91.
  • 13. Chung F. Recovery pattern and home-readiness after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 896-902.
  • 14. Tzovaras G, Pratsas K, Georgopoulou S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 744; author reply 745.
  • 15. Kim JT, Shim JK, Kim SH, Jung CW, Bahk JH. Trendelenburg position with hip flexion as a rescue strategy to increase spinal anaesthetic level after spinal block. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98: 396- 400.
  • 16. Hadjipavlou AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Katonis PG, Szpalski M. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and osteolytic tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 1595-1604.
  • 17. Hulme PA, Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, Berlemann U. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine 2006; 31: 1983-2001.
  • 18. Kleinmen W. Spinal, epidural, & caudal blocks. In: Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, Larson CP, editors. Clinical Anesthesiology. 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill; 2002. pp: 253-282.
  • 19. Selvan RB, Veliath DG, Rao PB, Ramachandran, Ranjan RV. Cholecystectomy under segmental thoracic epidural block in a patient with twin gestation. Saudi J Anaesth 2012; 6: 73-75.
  • 20. Burton AW, Hamid B. Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2008; 12: 22-27.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0144
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK