Nesrin GÜNDÜZ, Mehmet Bilgin ESER, Ahmet ASLAN, Adnan KABAALİOĞLU, Gülçin DURUKAN

Role of iliac crest tangent in correct numbering of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae

Background/aim: The iliac crest tangent (ICT) has recently emerged as a reliable landmark to correctly number the lumbosacraltransitional vertebrae (LSTV). We retrospectively evaluated the reproducibility and accuracy of the ICT as a landmark in subjectswithout disc degeneration.Materials and methods: Fifty-eight patients with LSTV [19 female, 41 (26–52) years] and 55 controls without LSTV [23 female, 40(26–55) years] who had undergone spinal computed tomography were included. The ICT was drawn on the coronal images, with thecursor in the sagittal view set to the posterior ⅓ of the vertebral body located one level above the LSTV. When more than 1.25 vertebralbody was counted below the ICT, the LSTV was considered as S1, otherwise it was considered as L5. The gold standard was countingthe vertebrae craniocaudally.Results: The interobserver agreement was good for determining ICT level (Cohen’s kappa = 0.78, P < 0.001). The rate of correctnumbering by ICT in the LSTV group was significantly less than in the controls (43.1% vs. 96.4%, respectively, P < 0.001). Patients withsacralization had a significantly lower correct numbering rate than patients with lumbarization (33.3% vs. 63.2%, respectively, P = 0.03).Conclusion: ICT does not seem to be a reliable landmark for correct numbering of LSTV in patients with no intervertebral discdegeneration.

PDF

___

1. Jancuska JM, Spivak JM, Bendo JA. A review of symptomatic lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: Bertolotti’s syndrome. Int J Spine Surg 2015; 9: 42.
2. Bron J, van Royen B, Wuisman PIJM. The clinical significance of lumbosacral transitional anomalies. Acta Orthop Belg 2007; 73: 687-695.
3. Apazidis A, Ricart PA, Diefenbach CM, Spivak JM. The prevalence of transitional vertebrae in the lumbar spine. Spine J 2011; 11: 858-862.
4. Paik NC, Lim CS, Jang HS. Numeric and morphological verification of lumbosacral segments in 8280 consecutive patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38: E573-E578.
5. Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DP. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984; 9: 493-495.
6. Quinlan JF, Duke D, Eustace S. Bertolotti’s syndrome. A cause of back pain in young people. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 1183-1186.
7. Nardo L, Alizai H, Virayavanich W, Liu F, Hernandez A, Lynch JA, Nevitt MC, McCulloch CE, Lane NE, Link TM. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: association with low back pain. Radiology 2012; 265: 497-503.
8. McCulloch JA, Waddell G. Variation of the lumbosacral myotomes with bony segmental anomalies. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1980; 62-B: 475-480.
9. Konin GP, Walz DM. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: classification, imaging findings, and clinical relevance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 1778-1786.
10. Tokgoz N, Ucar M, Erdogan AB, Kilic K, Ozcan C. Are spinal or paraspinal anatomic markers helpful for vertebral numbering and diagnosing lumbosacral transitional vertebrae? Korean J Radiol 2014; 15: 258-266.
11. Hughes RJ, Saifuddin A. Numbering of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae on MRI: role of the iliolumbar ligaments. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: W59-65.
12. Tureli D, Ekinci G, Baltacioglu F. Is any landmark reliable in vertebral enumeration? A study of 3.0-Tesla lumbar MRI comparing skeletal, neural, and vascular markers. Clin Imaging 2014; 38: 792-796.
13. Farshad-Amacker NA, Lurie B, Herzog RJ, Farshad M. Is the iliolumbar ligament a reliable identifier of the L5 vertebra in lumbosacral transitional anomalies? Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 2623- 30.
14. Farshad-Amacker NA, Aichmair A, Herzog RJ, Farshad M. Merits of different anatomical landmarks for correct numbering of the lumbar vertebrae in lumbosacral transitional anomalies. Eur Spine J 2015; 24: 600-608.
15. Carrino JA, Campbell PD Jr, Lin DC, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Flanders AE, Eng J, Vaccaro AR. Effect of spinal segment variants on numbering vertebral levels at lumbar MR imaging. Radiology 2011; 259: 196-202.
16. Mahato NK. Pedicular anatomy of the first sacral segment in transitional variations of the lumbo-sacral junction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: E1187-E1192.
17. Benlidayi IC, Coskun NC, Basaran S. Does lumbosacral transitional vertebra have any influence on sacral tilt? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015; 40: E1176-E1179.
18. Luoma K, Vehmas T, Raininko R, Luukkonen R, Riihimaki H. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra: relation to disc degeneration and low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 200-205.
19. Hsieh CY, Vanderford JD, Moreau SR, Prong T. Lumbosacral transitional segments: classification, prevalence, and effect on disk height. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000; 23: 483-489.
20. Mahato NK. Complexity of neutral zones, lumbar stability and subsystem adaptations: probable alterations in lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) subtypes. Med Hypotheses 2013; 80: 61-64.
21. Jagannathan D, Indiran V, Hithaya F, Alamelu M, Padmanaban S. Role of anatomical landmarks in identifying normal and transitional vertebra in lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging. Asian Spine J 2017; 11: 365-379.