Review of 306 evisceration surgeries performed between 2005 and 2013
Review of 306 evisceration surgeries performed between 2005 and 2013
Background/aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the reasons for eye evisceration surgeries performed from 2005 to 2013 in our clinic. Materials and methods: The medical records of patients who underwent evisceration surgery over the past 9 years were retrospectively evaluated. Detailed data were reviewed, with a focus on the first precipitating factor for evisceration. Results: Of the 306 patients who underwent evisceration surgery in the studied period, 111 (36.27%) were female (with a mean age of 41.56 ± 21.38 years) and 195 (63.73%) were male (with a mean age of 37.76 ± 21.92 years). The most common cause of evisceration was ocular trauma (184 patients; 60.1%). Male patients experienced significantly more trauma, while glaucoma was more common in female patients. Conclusions: Eye removal is devastating for both patients and their relatives, and its most important and preventable cause is ocular trauma.
___
- 1. Rasmussen ML, Prause JU, Johnson M, Kamper-Jørgensen F, Toft PB. Review of 345 eye amputations carried out in the period 1996-2003, at Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Acta Ophthalmol 2010; 88: 218221.
- 2. Hansen AB, Petersen C, Heegaard S, Prause JU. Review of 1028 bulbar eviscerations and enucleations. Changes in aetiology and frequency over a 20-year period. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999; 77: 331335.
- 3. Ibanga A, Asana U, Nkanga D, Duke R, Etim B, Oworu O. Indications for eye removal in southern Nigeria. Int Ophthalmol 2013; 33: 355360.
- 4. Dada T, Ray M, Tandon R, Vajpayee RB. A study of the indications and changing trends of evisceration in north India. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2002; 30: 120123.
- 5. Yousuf SJ, Jones LS, Kidwell ED. Enucleation and evisceration: 20 years of experience. Orbit 2012; 31: 211215.
- 6. Bary FB. A Singular View: The Art of Seeing with One Eye. 6th ed. Vienna, VA, USA: Michael O. Hughes; 2004.
- 7. Coday MP, Warner MA, Jahrling KV, Rubin PA. Acquired monocular vision: functional consequences from the patients perspective. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 18: 5663.
- 8. Soares IP, França VP. Evisceration and enucleation. Semin Ophthalmol 2010; 25: 9497.
- 9. de Gottrau P, Holbach LM, Naumann GO. Clinicopathological review of 1146 enucleations (1980-90). Br J Ophthalmol 1994; 78: 260265.
- 10. Acar U, Tok OY, Acar DE, Burcu A, Ornek F. A new ocular trauma score in pediatric penetrating eye injuries. Eye (Lond) 2011; 25: 370374.
- 11. Rahman I, Maino A, Devadason D, Leatherbarrow B. Open globe injuries: factors predictive of poor outcome. Eye (Lond) 2006; 20: 13361341.
- 12. Acar U, Yıldız EH, Ergintürk Acar D, Altıparmak UE, Yalnız Akkaya Z, Burcu A, Unlü N. Posttraumatic intraocular pressure elevation and associated factors in patients with zone I open globe injuries. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2013; 19: 115118.
- 13. Coşkun M, Ataş M, Akal A, Ilhan O, Keskin U, Tuzcu EA. The factors affecting the development of phthisis bulbi after penetrating eye injuries. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2012; 18: 317320 (article in Turkish with an abstract in English).
- 14. Porela-Tiihonen S, Kaarniranta K, Kokki H. Postoperative pain after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013; 39: 789798.
- 15. Durand ML. Endophthalmitis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013; 19: 227234.