Kemal BAYRAKÇEKEN, Ahmet Murad HONDUR, Hati̇ce Tuba ATALAY, Yavuz Kemal ARIBAŞ

Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery

Background/aim: To compare the clinical use, image quality and viewing angle of a commonly used contact wide angle viewing WAV system Advanced Visual Instruments AVI Panoramic Imaging Systems, NY, USA with a commonly used noncontact WAV system Leica RUV800, Leica Microsystems, Switzerland . Materials and methods: Images of 42 consecutively operated eyes were obtained with both systems at the same surgical stages and were compared for image quality using the Imatest Master 4.5.13 Imatest LLC, Boulder, USA software. The viewing angles of the images were calculated using the optic disc sizes measured from the OCT and infrared fundus images. The 68-degree AVI lens was compared with the 90-dioptre D Leica RUV800 lens, while the 130-degree AVI lens was compared with the 132-D Leica RUV800 lens. The surgical assistants were asked to grade the difficulty of holding the lens in place from 1 to 10, 1 being the easiest and 10 being the most difficult. Results: The contact system provided wider viewing angles with higher quality compared to the noncontact system both under fluid and air media. The difference was clinically significant in eyes with impaired corneal clarity, very high myopia, or small pupil. The difficulty of holding the lens in place ranged from 4 to 7, and decreased gradually with practice. Conclusions: Both WAV systems provided high image quality and adequate viewing angles in most cases. However, the contact system appeared to provide a superior image quality and/or a wider viewing angle in more challenging situations. The difficulty of holding the contact lens in place was found to be moderate.

Keywords:

Image quality, viewing angle, vitreoretinal surgery, wide angle viewing system,

___

1. Inoue M. Wide-angle viewing system. Developments in Ophthalmology 2014; 54: 87-91. doi: 10.1159/000360453
2. De Oliveira PRC, Berger AR, Chow DR. Vitreoretinal instruments: vitrectomy cutters, endoillumination and wideangle viewing systems. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous 2016; 2: 28. doi: 10.1186/s40942-016-0052-9
3. Read SP, Fortun JA. Visualization of the retina and vitreous during vitreoretinal surgery: new technologies. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 2017; 28 (3): 238-241. doi: 10.1097/ ICU.0000000000000368
4. Spitznas M. A binocular indirect ophthalmomicroscope (BIOM) for non-contact wide-angle vitreous surgery. Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 1987; 225 (1): 13-15. doi: 10.1007/bf02155797
5. Horiguchi M, Kojima Y, Shimada Y. New system for fiberopticfree bimanual vitreous surgery. Archives of Ophthalmology 2002; 120 (4): 491-494. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.4.491
6. Landers MB, Peyman GA, Wessels IF, Whalen P, Morales V. A new, non-contact wide field viewing system for vitreous surgery. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2003; 136 (1): 199-201. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00103-x
7. Shah VA, Chalam KV. Self-stabilizing wide-angle contact lens for vitreous surgery. Retina 2003; 23 (5): 667-669. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200310000-00010
8. Peyman GA, Canakis C, Livir-Rallatos C, Whalen P. Small-size pediatric vitrectomy wide-angle contact lens. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2003; 135 (2): 236-237. doi: 10.1016/s0002- 9394(02)01911-6
9. Chalam KV, Shah VA. Optics of wide-angle panoramic viewing system–assisted vitreous surgery. Survey Ophthalmology 2004; 49 (4): 437-445. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.04.010
10. Nakata K, Ohji M, Ikuno Y, Kusaka S, Gomi F et al. Wide-angle viewing lens for vitrectomy. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2004; 137 (4): 760-762. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.09.035
11. MacDonald L. Framework for an image sharpness management system. In: 7th Color and Imaging Conference Final Program and Proceedings. Society for Imaging Science and Technology 1999; Arizona, USA; pp. 75-79.
12. Ohji M, Tada E, Futamura H. Combining a contact lens and wide-angle viewing system for a wider fundus view. Retina 2011; 31 (9): 1958-1960. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31822a900b
13. Tabandeh H, London NJS, Boyer DS, Flynn HW Jr. Outcomes of small-gauge vitreoretinal surgery without scleral-depressed shaving of the vitreous base in the era of wide-angle viewing systems. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2019; 103 (12): 1765-1768. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313626
14. Ikuno Y, Ohji M, Kusaka S, Gomi F, Nakata K et al. Sutureless contact lens ring system during vitrectomy. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2002; 133 (6): 847-848. doi: 10.1016/s0002- 9394(02)01409-5
15. Kreps EO, Lemm JM, Ruagh EA, Ramkissoon YD. Fogging of non-contact viewing lenses during vitreoretinal surgery. Retina 2016; 36 (12): 2428-2429. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001216