Mustafa Erdem SAĞSÖZ, Rüstem Berhan PİRİMOĞLU

Radiation dose to breasts from a cardiac computed tomography angiography scanogram can be reduced by switching tube position

Background/aim: In a computed tomography (CT) examination, scanogram images are used to determine the range of the area to be imaged before scanning. The importance of scanogram image exposure has increased since total examination radiation has decreased due to technological advancements. The purpose of this study was to determine and compare radiation doses delivered to patients while the tube was in anterior-posterior (AP) and posterior-anterior (PA) positions during a CT angiography scanogram. Materials and methods: The radiation doses absorbed by the breast tissue of 55 female patients who underwent cardiac dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) angiography were determined using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100, Harshaw, MA, USA). Four patients were excluded from the study for various reasons. Results: Radiation doses absorbed by the breasts were significantly lower when the tube position was switched during the scanogram. The absorbed doses, calculated from scanogram exposures, were 520 ± 50 µSv for the AP projection and 410 ± 45 µSv for the PA projection. Total skin doses from the DSCT examinations were 18.9 ± 2.3 mSv. Conclusion: We attributed the approximately 20% lower doses to the position of the scanogram tube, which was in the PA position.

PDF

___

1. UNSCEAR. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, UNSCEAR 2008 Report. New York, NY, USA: UNSCEAR; 2010.
2. Nikolic B, Khosa F, Lin PP, Khan AN, Sarwar S, Yam C, Court LE, Raptopoulos V, Clouse ME. Absorbed radiation dose in radiosensitive organs during coronary CT angiography using 320-MDCT: effect of maximum tube voltage and heart rate variations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 1347-1354.
3. Wrixon AD. New ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot 2008; 28: 161-168.
4. Foley SJ, McEntee MF, Achenbach S, Brennan PC, Rainford LS, Dodd JD. Breast surface radiation dose during coronary CT angiography: reduction by breast displacement and lead shielding. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 367-373.
5. Schmidt B, Saltybaeva N, Kolditz D, Kalender WA. Assessment of patient dose from CT localizer radiographs. Med Phys 2013; 40: 1-8.
6. Gu J, Bednarz B, Caracappa PF, Xu XG. The development, validation and application of a multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanner model for assessing organ doses to the pregnant patient and the fetus using Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54: 2699-2717.
7. Henzler T, Hanley M, Arnoldi E. Practical strategies for low radiation dose cardiac computed tomography. J Thorac Imag 2010; 25: 213-220.
8. Katch VL, Campaigne B, Freedson P, Sady S, Katch FI, Behnke AR. Contribution of breast volume and weight to body fat distribution in females. Am J Phys Anthropol 1980; 53: 93-100.
9. National Institute of Standards and Technology. X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients. Gaithersburg, MD, UDA: NIST; 1989.
10. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, de Gonzalez AB, Miglioretti DL. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 2078-2086.
11. Raff GL. Radiation dose from coronary CT angiography: five years of progress. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2010; 4: 365- 374.
12. Sagsoz ME, Bayraktutan UG, Ogul H, Kantarci M. Chest circumference as a predictive parameter of computed tomography coronary angiography radiation doses from dualsource computed tomography. Eurasian J Med 2013; 45: 43-46.