Fatma BİLGEN, Alper URAL, Mehmet BEKERECİOĞLU

Preoperative estimation of breast resection weight in patients undergoing inferior pedicle reduction mammoplasty: the Bilgen formula

Background/aim: Symptomatic breast hypertrophy has a significant impact on the quality of life of women. The amount of tissueto be excised may be preoperatively estimated by an experienced surgeon. However, this remains a subjective assessment. Accuratequantification of the amount of breast tissue to be resected in the preoperative period will be a guide for both patient information andthe surgeon during the operation. The aim of this study is to develop a new method based on simple measurements that can accuratelyestimate the resection weight in the preoperative period in a wide range of patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty.Materials and methods: The study was carried out between December 2016 and September 2018. With the determined drawing andmeasurement methods, a triangle was obtained by measuring the distances among the sternal notch (A) - right nipple areola midpoint(B), sternal notch (A) - left nipple areola midpoint (C) and both internipple areola (B-C). The height of this triangle (h) was foundby measuring the distance between the sternal notch and the midpoint of both nipple areola levels. The amount of breast tissue to beresected for each breast was calculated by multiplying the distance between the sternal notch–nipple areola and the height of the largetriangle. The formula may be expressed as AB × h for the right breast and AC × h for left breast.Results: When the t values and significance levels of the beta coefficients of the independent variables were examined, the preoperativevalues were determined to be in accordance with the actual values after surgery (P < 0.05). The values calculated before were calculatedas the percentage of the actual values (91%). In other words, the R2 value showed that the calculated values were compatible with theactual values (R2 = 0.910).Conclusions: With the formula described herein, one may accurately estimate the amount of tissue to be resected in a wide rangeof patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty whose sternal notch–nipple distances are between 28–42 cm. Additionally, becausemeasurements for each breast are performed separately, breast asymmetry does not affect the results. In conclusion, the formula wedevised is simple, applicable, and has a high accuracy rate.

PDF

___

1. Chao JD, Memmel HC, Redding JF, Egan L, Odom LC et al. Reduction mammaplasty is a functional operation, improving quality of life in symptomatic women: A prospective, single-center breast reduction outcome study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2002; 110:1644-1652; discussion 1653- 1654.
2. Thoma A, Sprague S, Veltri K, Duku E, Furlong W. A prospective study of patients undergoing breast reduction surgery: Health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2007; 120:13-22.
3. Spector JA, Karp NS. Reduction mammaplasty. A significant improvement at any size. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2007; 120:845-850.
4. Freire M, Neto MS, Garcia EB, Quaresma MR, Ferreira LM. Functional capacity and postural pain outcomes after reduction mammaplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2007; 119:1149-1156; discussion 1157-1158.
5. Tenna S, Cogliandro A, Cagli B, Barone M, Delle Femmine P et al. Breast hypertrophy and asymmetry: A retrospective study on a sample of 344 consecutive patients. Acta Chirurgiae Plasticae 2012; 54:9-12.
6. Turner AJ, Dujon DG. Predicting cup size after reduction mammaplasty. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 2005; 58:290- 298.
7. Grossman AJ, Roudner LA. A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1980; 66:851-852.
8. Schnur PL, Hoehn JG, Ilstrup DM, Cahoy MJ, Chu CP. Reduction mammaplasty: cosmetic or reconstructive procedure? Annals of Plastic Surgery 1991; 27:232-237.
9. Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M, Jurell G. Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 1996; 30:129-132.
10. Loughry CW, Sheffer DB, Price TE, Einsporn RL, Barthfai RG. Breast volume measurement of 248 women using biostereometric analysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1987; 80:553-558.
11. Pozzobon AV, SabinoNeto M, Veiga DF, F.Abla LE, Pereira JB et al. Magnetic resonance images and linear measurements in the surgical treatment of breast asymmetry. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2009; 33:196-203.
12. Tanabe YN, Honda T, Nakajima Y, Sakurai H, Nozaki M. Intraoperative application of three-dimensional imaging for breast surgery. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 2005; 39:329-352.
13. Westreich M. Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1997; 100:468-479.
14. Sommer NZ, Zook EG, Verhulst SJ. The prediction of breast reduction weight. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2002; 109:506-511.
15. Descamps MJ, Landau AG, Lazarus D, Hudson DA. A formula determining resection weights for reduction mammaplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2008; 121:397-400.
16. Kocak E, Carruthers KH, Mc Mahan JD. A reliable method for the preoperative estimation of tissue to be removed during reduction mammaplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2011; 127:1059-1064.
17. Regnault P, Daniel RK. Breastreduction. In: Regnault P, Daniel RK (editors). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Principles and Techniques. Boston, MA, USA: Little, Brown; 1984. pp. 499- 538.
18. Appel JZ III, Wendel JJ, Zellner EG, Hagan KF, Shack RB et al. Association between preoperative measurements and resection weight in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2010; 64:512-515.