ABDUSSAMED YALÇIN, ERSİN GÜRKAN DUMLU, MEHMET TOKAÇ, ÖMER PARLAK, LEVENT ÖZTÜRK, MEHMET KILIÇ

Healthy subjects' knowledge of surgical complications: a hospital-based survey

Background/aim: There is an ongoing debate about how much a patient should know about serious or frequently occurring risks of their surgery. In this study, we evaluated healthy subjects' perspectives on knowledge of serious surgical complications. Materials and methods: Three hundred and thirty healthy subjects (151 women, 179 men; mean age: 43.6 ± 17.3 years) were surveyed with the study questionnaire. Social profile, surgical history of the healthy subjects, and presence of a relative while giving preoperative consent were assessed. Results: Only 23.5% (39/166) of the subjects were informed about all the potential complications of their previous surgical operation and 44.9% (73/166) did not get any preoperative consent on surgical complications. A statistically significant percentage of subjects who did not get proper information about the serious complications involved in their surgery indicated a desire for preoperative informed consent (97.0%, 128/132, P = 0.0001). Conclusion: The results indicated that a significant percentage of the subjects wanted to be informed of the potential complications of a surgery in the presence of a relative (73.9%, 192/260, P = 0.009). Involving a relative in preoperative consent may have a positive effect on the patient and can increase the level of postoperative recall of the risks.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Informed consent, health survey, intraoperative complications

Healthy subjects' knowledge of surgical complications: a hospital-based survey

Keywords:

Informed consent, health survey, intraoperative complications,

PDF

___

General Medical Council. Seeking Patients’ Consent: The Ethical Considerations. London, UK: General Medical Council; 1998.
General Medical Council. Consent: Patients and Doctors Making Decisions Together. London, UK: General Medical Council.
Lloyd A, Hayes P, Bell PR, Naylor AR. The role of risk and benefit perception in informed consent for surgery. Med Decis Making 2001; 21: 141–149.
Anderson OA, Wearne IM. Informed consent for elective surgery–what is best practice? J R Soc Med 2007; 100: 97–100.
Jawaid M, Farhan M, Masood Z, Husnain S. Preoperative informed consent: is it truly informed? Iran J Public Health 2012; 41: 25–30.
Liddle C. Preparing patients to undergo surgery. Nurs Times 2012; 108: 12–13.
Cawich SO, Barnett AT, Crandon IW, Drew SD, Gordon- Strachan G. From the patient’s perspective: is there a need to improve the quality of informed consent for surgery in training hospitals? Perm J 2013; 17: 22–26.
Siegal G, Bonnie RJ, Appelbaum PS. Personalized disclosure by information-on-demand: attending to patients’ needs in the informed consent process. J Law Med Ethics 2012; 40: 359– 367.
Smith HK, Manjaly JG, Yousri T, Upadhyay N, Taylor H, Nicol SG, Livingstone JA. Informed consent in trauma: does written information improve patient recall of risks? A prospective randomised study. Injury 2012; 43: 1534–1538.
Sheth A. Informed consent in clinical practice. J Postgrad Med 2003; 49: 287–288.
Şahin N, Öztürk A, Özkan Y, Demirhan Erdemir A. What do patients recall from informed consent given before orthopedic surgery? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010; 44: 469–475.
Parzeller M, Wenk M, Zedler B. Patient information and informed consent before and after medical intervention. Dtsch Arztebl 2007; 104: A576–586.
Weinstein JN, Clay K, Morgan TS. Informed patient choice: patient-centered valuing of surgical risks and benefits. Health Affair 2007; 26: 726–730.
Fusetti C, Lazzaro M, Trobia M, Lucchina S, Petri J, Garavaglia G. Patients’ point of view on informed consent: a prospective study in carpal tunnel surgery. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2013; 42: E111–115.
Crepeau AE, McKinney BI, Fox-Ryvicker M, Castelli J, Penna J, Wang ED. Prospective evaluation of patient comprehension of informed consent. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: e114.
Mayberry MK, Mayberry JF. Towards better informed consent in endoscopy: a study of information and consent processes in gastroscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Eur J Gastroeneterol Hepatol 2001; 13: 1467–1476.
Burkle CM, Pasternak JJ, Armstrong MH, Keegan MT. Patient perspectives on informed consent for anaesthesia and surgery: American attitudes. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013; 57: 342– 349.
McKeaugue M, Windsor J. Patients’ perception of the adequacy of informed consent: a pilot study of elective general surgical patients in Auckland. New Zeal Med J 2003; 116: U355.
Hekkenberg RJ, Irish JC, Rotstein LE, Brown DH, Gullane PJ. Informed consent in head and neck surgery: how much do patients actually remember? J Otolaryngol 1997; 26: 155–159.