Genetic evaluation of Mycobacterium bovis isolates with MIRU-VNTR and spoligotyping
Genetic evaluation of Mycobacterium bovis isolates with MIRU-VNTR and spoligotyping
Background/aim: Determining the epidemiological characteristics of M. bovis strains isolated from human and animal tuberculosis cases will assist in taking more appropriate and effective control measures in controlling tuberculosis originating from animals. Materials and methods: In this study, 32 M. bovis isolates of animal origin and 10 of human origin were isolated and identified in the Çukurova region between March 2011 and June 2012. The 12-locus MIRU-VNTR and spoligotyping methods were used. Results: Six different patterns were determined by spoligotyping and 10 by MIRU-VNTR. When both methods were used together, the number of patterns was found to be 28; MIRU4, MIRU26, MIRU31, and MIRU40 had the highest locus discrimination powers by MIRU-VNTR. The isolates concentrated in the SB0120 pattern at the rate of 42.85% in spoligotyping. By the same method, it was seen that 7 isolates were M bovis ssp. caprae pattern and 2 human isolates were M. bovis BCG pattern. Nevertheless, spoligotyping and MIRUVNTR patterns showed that 5 M. bovis isolates of human origin were 100% compatible with isolates originating from cattle. Conclusion: In this study, we determined that the use of spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR methods together was found to be more sensitive in the epidemiological analysis of M. bovis isolates.
___
- 1. Mignard S, Pichat C, Carret G. Mycobacterium bovis infection, Lyon, France. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2006; 12: 1431- 1433. doi: 10.3201/eid1209.060209
- 2. Jenkins AO, Cadmus SIB, Venter EH, Pourcel C, Hauk Y et al. Molecular epidemiology of human and animal tuberculosis in Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria. Veterinary Microbiology 2011; 151: 139-147. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.037
- 3. Van Ingen J, Rahim Z, Mulder A, Boeree MJ, Simeone R et al. Characterization of Mycobacterium orygis as M. Tuberculosis complex subspecies. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2012; 18:653-655. doi: 10.3201/eid1804.110888
- 4. Alexander KA, Laver PN, Michel AL, Williams M, van Helden PD et al. Novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex pathogen, M. mungi. Emerging Infectios Diseases 2010; 16: 1296-1299. doi: 10.3201/eid1608.100314
- 5. Keating LA, Wheeler PR, Mansoor H, Inwald JK, Dale J et al. The pyruvate requirement of some members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex is due to an inactive pyruvate kinase: implications for in vivo growth. Molecular Microbiology 2005; 56: 163-174. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04524.x
- 6. Ritz N, Hanekom WA, Robins-Browne R, Britton WJ, Curtis N. Influence of BCG vaccine strain on the immune response and protection against tuberculosis. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 2008; 32: 821-841. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00118.x
- 7. Özbey G, Kalender H, Muz A. Sığır tüberkülozu’nun epidemiyolojisi ve teşhisi. derleme. F.Ü. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2008; 22: 307-314.
- 8. Collins DM. Advances in molecular diagnostics for Mycobacterium bovis. Veterinary Microbiology 2011; 151: 2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.019
- 9. Thoen C, Lobue P, de Kantor I. The importance of Mycobacterium bovis as a zoonosis. Veterinary Microbiology 2006; 112: 339-345. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.11.047
- 10. Kaya A, İçen H, Tuzcu N, Şimşek A, Yeşilmen S et al. Comparison of tuberculin skin test, IFN-γ assay, real time PCR and lateral flow rapid test in diagnosis of field outbreaks of bovine tuberculosis. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi 2015; 21:5:739-743. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2015.13293
- 11. Aslan G, Kuyucu N, Çalıkoğlu M, Ersöz G, Ülger M et al. Mycobacterium bovis’in etken olduğu tüberküloz olguları. ANKEM Dergisi 2009; 23: 182-187.
- 12. Yardımcı H, Ünal CB, Ataseven L, Sarıeyyüpoğlu B. Sığır tüberkülozunun PCR ile tanısı ve Mycobacterium bovis’in spoligotiplendirme yöntemi ile genotiplendirilmesi. Ankara Ünivesritesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2007; 54: 183-189.
- 13. Çavuşoğlu C, Akıncı P, Söyler İ, Bayram N, Vardar F. Yaygın Mycobacterium bovis BCG infeksiyonunun laboratuvar tanısı. İnfeksiyon Dergisi 2007; 21:39-44.
- 14. Baker MG, Lopez LD, Cannon MC, De Lisle GW, Collins DM. Continuing Mycobacterium bovis transmission from animals to humans in New Zealand. Epidemiology and Infection 2006; 134: 1068-1073. doi: 10.1017/S0950268806005930
- 15. Aranaz A, Liebana E, Mateos A, Dominguez L, Vidal D et al. Space oligonucleotide typing of Mycobacterium bovis strains from cattle and other animals: a tool for studying epidemiology of tuberculosis, Australia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1996; 34: 2734-2740.
- 16. Munyeme M, Rigouts L, Shamputa IC, Muma JB, Tryland M et al. Isolation and characterization of Mycobacterium bovis strains from indigenous Zambian cattle using Spacer oligonucleotide typing technique. BMC Microbiology 2009; 9: 144-152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-144
- 17. Supply P, Allix C, Lesjean S, Oelemann MC, Ru¨sch-Gerdes S et al. Proposal for standardization of optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit–variable-number tandem repeat typing of mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2006; 12: 4498-4510. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01392-06
- 18. Boniotti MB, Goria M, Loda D, Mondo A, Tisato E et al. Molecular Typing of Mycobacterium bovis strains isolated in Italy from 2000 to 2006 and evaluation of variable-number tandem repeats for geographically optimized genotyping. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2009; 47: 636–644. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01192-08
- 19. Ambrosio SR, Márcia de Deus OE, Rodriguez CAR, Neto JSF1, Amaku M. Comparison of three decontamination methods for Mycobacterium bovis isolation. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 2008; 39: 241-244. doi: 10.1590/S1517- 83822008000200008
- 20. İsmail C, Mehmet B.S, Ahmet Saniç, Gülnur T. Tüberkülozda Bakteriyolojik Tanı. Ankara:2007; pp.57.
- 21. Wayne LG, Kubica GP. Mycobacteria in: PHA Sneath (ed) Bergeys Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2th.ed. The Williams&Wilkins Co; Baltimore: 1986. pp. 861-867.
- 22. Oral Zeytinli Ü. Çukurova bölgesinde akciğer tüberkülozlu hastalardan izole edilen Mycobacterium tuberculosis suşlarının spoligotyping ve MIRU-VNTR (Mycobacterial İnterspersed Repetitive Unit-Variable Number of Tandem Repeat) yöntemiyle tiplendirilmesi. Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni 2012; 46(2): 202-210.
- 23. Kamerbeek J, L. Kolk SA, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, van Embden J. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1997; 35: 907-914.
- 24. Tuzcu N, Kayar B, Uysal EB, Gülcü Y, Marzi M et al. Spoligotyping of M. tuberculosis strains from cattle in Turkey. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi 2015; 21: 507- 511. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2014.12769
- 25. Skuce RA, McCorry TP, McCarroll JF, Roring SM, Scott AN et al. Discrimination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex bacteria using novel VNTR-PCR targets. Microbiology 2002; 148: 519–528. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-2-519
- 26. Smittipat N, Billamas P, Palittapongarnpim M, Thong-On A, Temu MM et al. Polymorphism of variable-number tandem repeats at multiple loci in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2005; 43: 5034-5043. doi: 10.1128/ JCM.43.10.5034-5043.2005
- 27. Ortatatlı M, Çiftçi MK, Tuzcu M. Sığırlarda tüberküloz ve diğer granülamatöz pnomoniler üzerine patolojik incelemeler. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi 1998; 14: 139- 150.
- 28. Beytut E. Kars ili ve yöresinde sığırlarda tüberküloz insidensi ve lezyonların lokalizasyonu üzerine patolojik incelemeler. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2001;7: 15-25.
- 29. Jeon BY, Je S, Park J, Kim Y, Lee EG et al. Variable number tandem repeat analysis of Mycobacterium bovis isolates from Gyeonggi-do. Korean Journal of Veterinarian Science 2008; 9: 145-153. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2008.9.2.145
- 30. Hilty M, Diguimbaye C, Schelling E, Baggi F, Tanner M et al. Evaluation of discriminatory pover of variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) typing of Mycobacterium bovis strains, Switzerland. Veterinary Microbiology 2005; 109: 217-222. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.05.017
- 31. Zuma´Rraga MNJ, Martin C, Samper S, Alito A, Latini O et al. Usefulness of spoligotyping in molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis-related infections in South America. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1999; 37: 296–303.
- 32. Çavuşoğlu C, Yılmaz FF. Ege Bölgesi’nde insan Mycobacterium bovis enfeksiyonlarının moleküler epidemiyolojisi. Mikrobiyoloji Bülteni 2017, 51(2): 165-170. doi: 10.5578/ mb.53963
- 33. Avsever ML, Çavuşoğlu C, Yazıcıoğlu Ö, Eskiizmirliler S, Erdal G et al. New spoligotyping pattern of Mycobacterium bovis isolates from farm animals in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 2017; 64: 37-43.
- 34. Duarte EL, Domingos M, Amado A, Cunha MV, Botelho A. MIRU-VNTR typing adds discriminatory value to groups of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium caprae strains defined by spoligotyping. Veterinary Microbiology 2010; 143: 299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.11.027